Ofcourse no America haters, liberals, rinos etc. Should biden have been ok to appoint his kids assuming they are qualified for the job they are hired for?
Trump can pick people with those same traits without dipping into his family. I believe it would be to great a conflict of interest. But if you believe otherwise, you are welcome to.
just as a comment to Trump's narrative: Information that has been 'destroyed', can often be retrieved with the right attitude and nouse. It's just deeper in the bowels of the computer,
In any case - he's right: A judge needs to decide whether any 'auto-pen' signatures are null and void, given that the use of them is ubiquitous (sign) in letter-writing softwares in government departments. Employees are encouraged to load theirs into their email profiles.
However, arguably a president signing significant documents such as pardons, or EOs, should do so holding a pen, as Trump has done, demonstrably.
Then, the judge has to decide what sort of document is to be deemed significant, and what is not. Maybe if there is only one official to-be-referenced copy, distributed online (and not 10 000 letters with separate ids, for example).
Also, a judge will have to decide which date to declare 25th aMendment on Biden. From that date forwards, everything is null and void. That one is quite a feat. Karoline Leavitt suggested using the debate, where himself glitched on Live TV as a visible, public marker. <she's a smart cookie
Yes. There may well be no legitimate Supreme Court Justices at all, in fact; so that Trump is free to appoint His new panel.
Candidates? I'd like most of His children on board.
No. To great a conflict of interest.
I can't see it's a conflict.
Surely you agree that no Liberal should be appointed? Nor a RINO? Nor a Trump hater?
Hopefully so. Then it is essential that the courts should not frustrate His agenda, so what better way to ensure it?
Ofcourse no America haters, liberals, rinos etc. Should biden have been ok to appoint his kids assuming they are qualified for the job they are hired for?
Of course not, Biden was a fake president. That's a false dilemma
Why do you think Trump family members are the right fit for the various positions?
Loyalty, trustworthiness, and connections
But I also believe that bloodline will out, and they are from the greatest of bloodlines
Trump can pick people with those same traits without dipping into his family. I believe it would be to great a conflict of interest. But if you believe otherwise, you are welcome to.
There is no evidence of this at all, just a conjecture from a tweet
Also SCOTUS Justices are confirmed by the Senate.
FAKE NEWS
https://nitter.poast.org/holonabove/status/1901574542989967640
just as a comment to Trump's narrative: Information that has been 'destroyed', can often be retrieved with the right attitude and nouse. It's just deeper in the bowels of the computer,
In any case - he's right: A judge needs to decide whether any 'auto-pen' signatures are null and void, given that the use of them is ubiquitous (sign) in letter-writing softwares in government departments. Employees are encouraged to load theirs into their email profiles.
However, arguably a president signing significant documents such as pardons, or EOs, should do so holding a pen, as Trump has done, demonstrably.
Then, the judge has to decide what sort of document is to be deemed significant, and what is not. Maybe if there is only one official to-be-referenced copy, distributed online (and not 10 000 letters with separate ids, for example).
Also, a judge will have to decide which date to declare 25th aMendment on Biden. From that date forwards, everything is null and void. That one is quite a feat. Karoline Leavitt suggested using the debate, where himself glitched on Live TV as a visible, public marker. <she's a smart cookie
I agree fren...
I'll take this one down for now over the comment that it's fake news.
I can put it back up later if it's not.