Interesting..."we now have plenty of money - our new backers are Jews - as soon as 'we' (or 'they) take care of Kennedy
(media.greatawakening.win)
🇮🇱 ISRAEL F✡R LAST 🕎
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (121)
sorted by:
Not as an act of war. The "vaccine" was more like a crime against humanity. Nothing has been addressed on that level.
Poor at argument. Always need to switch the topic.
Governments addressed the safety of the vaccine many times. You just didn’t like what they said.
You’re poor at logic, which is what I was pointing out. “The government addressed it so it’s settled”. But clearly you don’t feel that way for all issues.
The government lied about essential information during the Covid fiasco. That's not "addressing" anything.
Whatever dispute might have been between the U.S. and Israel was settled between them. There was no state of war. The evidence is that the U.S. was complicit. This is old news for me; I read an analysis article on this, decades ago, in the Journal of the Naval Institute. No one has explained a reasonable rationale for making old news a cause celebre. Other than holding a grudge against certain people.
In the same way, Israel lied about their “mistake” and the US government lied about being complicit. In your own words, that’s not really addressing or settling anything, is it?
In both scenarios, you have people who want investigations into the truth - not the official “truth” from the government - and justice. You want to frame this as anti-Semitic just like liberals framed us questioning the vaccine as “anti-Science”.
What can’t you understand about making old news controversial again?? Hello, we’re looking at the NEWLY released un-redacted JFK files showing the connection to ISRAEL. The CIA literally redacted Israel from the public. Shouldn’t we be looking at the thing they tried to cover up?? Lmao. In doing so, it behooves us to re-examine whether they are our “greatest ally”. I just gave you a perfectly reasonable reason why we’re making “old news” controversial again.
It’s like if you found out your wife has been lying to you for years and cheated on you a second time. You’re going to question “well I thought you said you ended it with so-and-so” and she’s going to pull the “that’s just old news, I don’t know why we have to make old news a cause for celebre“. And then you give some reasons why it’s perfectly reasonable to question that first “mistake” and she’s like “seems like you’re just judging me because I’m Jewish”. That’s you right now. You’re the wife.
Americans want the truth about the relationship between Israel and America, NOT the official “settled” narrative.
When the conversation opens with "the Jews," then, yes, it is anti-Semitic If the subject is re-opened to investigate the perfidy of the U.S. side, then we might learn something. It inspires the thought that someone on the U.S. side wanted an incident that could be used against Israel. But, for some reason, it didn't work. It might have to do with the fact that the LIberty was not sunk and there were a plentiful number of living witnesses. Better to hush it up.
I haven't seen any JFK connection to Israel emerging from the material, but kindly inform me what it would be. Is it more reasonable for the CIA to obscure a connection that would reveal what IT was up to? You are walking into this with a foregone conclusion.
And if it turns out that Israel is innocent of all the things you imagine, you would swallow nicely and let it go? I do not for a moment think that your side is coming from a viewpoint of objective curiosity.
Sounds like you love the government and supported the actor playing Biden.