Trillions of tons of hydrogen may be waiting under our feet
A new energy industry is emerging around hydrogen made by rocks instead of renewables
PICREL: Hydrogen from geological formations makes up about 10% of the flammable gases that form the Yanartaş flames near Cirali, Türkiye. The fires are said to have been burning for thousands of years and may be the flaming rocks mentioned in the myth of the Chimera.
Hydrogen is a popular molecule right now. Billions of dollars are flowing from investors and governments into projects to make more hydrogen and use it to decarbonize both industry and transportation. But what’s often lost in the discussion is that hydrogen is really an energy transfer medium, not an energy source.
The hydrogen available today is made in processes that are powered by renewable energy or, more often, fossil fuels. Molecular hydrogen as it is used and traded now is no more or less sustainable than the energy used to create it.
Except, that is, in Bourakebougou, a small town in southwestern Mali. There, almost 40 years ago, engineers drilling for water tapped instead into a natural underground reservoir of hydrogen gas. What they saw---a dry well emitting wind instead of water—was at first a disappointment.
Then, according to local lore, it became a catastrophe. A worker smoking a cigarette accidentally ignited the gas stream, creating a huge plume of smokeless fire that burned for weeks before workers were able to extinguish it. Tests showed it wasn’t natural gas, so they capped the borehole and walked away.
The idea of tapping such geological hydrogen had been confined to academic circles until around 2012, when Aliou Diallo, a Malian businessman, hired a mobile analytical laboratory to characterize the gas at the site. Diallo had purchased oil and gas exploration rights in the area after hearing about the flaming well.
The mobile lab found 98% pure hydrogen. For Bourakebougou, the discovery brought the fuel needed to generate reliable electricity, at first via a modified car engine and later through purpose-built equipment. It also changed Diallo’s business, which is now called Hydroma and is focused on geological hydrogen.
Diallo is part of a growing crowd of geochemists, entrepreneurs, and investors who see opportunities worldwide to develop geological hydrogen as a primary energy source with little impact on the climate, unlike carbon-containing fossil fuels. Companies are drilling about 200 exploration wells across the globe, mostly in secret, according to industry sources. But so far, Bourakebougou is the only one to produce anything of any economic value, and experts don’t know if geological hydrogen will remain a useful curiosity or launch a new energy economy.
Clean energy under our feet
Douglas Wicks, a program director exploring geological hydrogen for the US Department of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy (ARPA‑E), says one reason there aren’t more productive projects is that no one has been looking for the gas underground until recently. “The Earth has been producing hydrogen at large volumes for all of history,” he said during a panel discussion on geological hydrogen at Climate Week NYC in September. “We just chose as humankind not to really pay attention.”
Now we have the problem of oxygen depletion.
With CO2 (from burning carbon) ----plants can replenish the oxygen. How does this work when you turn all of the oxygen into water?
https://www.oxygenlevels.org/
IMO ---- we should go back to burning coal.
Nature has a way of balancing things out on it's own.
You'd have to burn a hell of a lot of oxygen to even make a dent worth measuring...
Because if you believe burning H2O2 and outputting H2O is a problem, then surely you must believe it's possible for man, like ants on this rock, influence "global warming"...
NO --- where did I say that?
Burning hydrogen consumes atmospheric oxygen. Our oxygen becomes water ---- we can't breath water.
See the drop in oxygen ----> https://www.oxygenlevels.org/
Burning carbon creates CO2 ----- plants take CO2 and give us back our oxygen. More CO2, more plant growth, more oxygen ---- there is a simple balance.
Not sure....
Burning anything consumes oxygen. Substitute burning hydrogen instead of hydrocarbons (gasoline). Hydrogen does require a significant amount of oxygen to burn, but when comparing per unit of energy released, gasoline and hydrogen are roughly similar in oxygen demand. However, hydrogen's advantage comes from being cleaner, as it only produces water as a byproduct.
how does the atmospheric oxygen get replaced?
Hydrogen is not "cleaner." Carbon dioxide is not "dirty." Or, check your breath in the mirror.
I understand, though, that addition of some hydrogen to the usual automotive fuel balance does wonders for fuel efficiency.