Dennis Wagner X:
Imtiaz Mahmood: "Let me tell you why a Muslim would drive his car into a crowd of innocent people. I was raised Muslim, and I know exactly why this happens. It’s not poverty. It’s not oppression. It’s not even radicalization. It’s the logical outcome of Islamic doctrine itself.
It doesn’t matter if you’re a Muslim or not; we, as human beings, carry guilt deep inside us. We know we are not good enough and spend our lives trying to redeem ourselves through good deeds, thinking it will make the guilt disappear.
Christianity, for example, offers a way out of guilt, a solution not based on your works but on Christ’s. Salvation isn’t earned; it’s given. You accept that you can’t redeem yourself because Christ did everything on your behalf. That means you’re free. Free to live, free to build, free to serve, free to love.
When Christians feel lost, broken, and needing forgiveness, they can go to church, talk to a pastor or priest, and leave knowing they have been forgiven.
Islam, on the other hand, doesn’t offer redemption; it weaponizes guilt. Instead of providing salvation, Allah exposes you, holds your sins over your head, and threatens you with hellfire and torture in the grave.
The Quran isn’t a book of peace; it’s a book of threats. It bullies Muslims into obedience through fear, humiliation, and punishment.
So, what happens when a Muslim seeks redemption? They try to be better Muslims. They pray, fast, give to charity, go on Hajj, and do everything Allah commands. But it never works. I know. I did it.
And no matter how much you pray, no matter how much you try, the guilt never goes away. Because deep down, every Muslim knows it’s not enough. Allah always demands more.
Allah loves those who die fighting against the infidels. That’s not an opinion, it’s in the Quran, Hadith, and every lesson taught to children.
This is why Muslims, even the so-called "moderates," always hesitate to condemn terrorism. Because they know Allah requires jihad. They might not be willing to commit it themselves, but they cannot say it’s wrong.
So when a Muslim fails to reach peace through religious rituals, they have two choices:
Give up, stop being devout, and learn to live with the guilt, or commit to jihad because that’s the only way to be true to yourself.
The Quran spells it out clearly: “Kill those who do not worship Allah or obey the Prophet” (9:29).
So when a Muslim embraces this identity fully, killing infidels isn’t just justified; it’s joyful. It’s an act of:
✔ Saving yourself ✔ Obeying Allah ✔ Securing your eternity ✔ Finally escaping the crushing weight of guilt
This is why a Muslim can drive his car into a crowd of innocent people and feel nothing but satisfaction. Because for the first time in his life, he finally believes he has done something worthy of redemption."
Let me tell you why a liberal would torch the Tesla of innocent people. It’s not oppression. It’s not even radicalization. It’s the logical outcome of liberalism itself. It doesn’t matter who you are, we, as human beings, carry guilt deep inside us. We know we are not good enough and spend our lives trying to redeem ourselves through deeds, thinking it will make the guilt disappear.
Christianity, for example, offers a way out of guilt, a solution not based on your works but on Christ’s. Salvation isn’t earned; it’s given. You accept that you can’t redeem yourself because Christ did everything on your behalf. That means you’re free. Free to live, free to build, free to serve, free to love.
When Christians feel lost, broken, and needing forgiveness, they can go to church, talk to a pastor or priest, and leave knowing they have been forgiven.
Liberalism on the other hand, doesn’t offer redemption; it weaponizes guilt. Instead of providing salvation, the ideology exposes you, holds your “sins” over your head
In that case, please, research: chants, invocation, speak, frequency, vibration, creation. Unfortunately, English is a mix and bastardation of quite a number of languages, or better said: ways to use the tongue, as langue means tongue. This is quite confusing at times.
islamofascist actually is a reinforcement of the negative (subject doer coupled to the emotion or energy that is contained in the programmed thought: fascist). Same for islamonazi or mooselimb. It all starts with thought and the quality of the emotion i.e. energy related to it. That creates what is.
In English this is called reality, which is purely that what is material ( from mater/ mother) In Germanic languages, WIRKLICHKEIT, or that what seems to be working is wider in meaning, as it leaves room for that which on a meta-physical level has a additional power.
You are posing the question: WHY. In essence you are asking: WHO, as the word why, means for which man? The reason for the season, so to speak.
The people who are at a level of influencing the outcomes, create egregores, or energy umbrellas where they harvest the energy induced by emotion. There are several Freemason groups who only focus on words and meaning. What do you think is the reason for that? Because it is fancy?
Look at communism. In essence, the words drive it. It is ideology. Thought and emotion is aligned to bring about something destructive on the aggregate level. Words are given new meaning and appeal to the lower vibrational state of being.
Compare that to a contemporary class mate of Marx, Max Stirner. The book: the one and his property (Der Einzige und sein Eigentum, of course in English mistranslated: The Unique and Its Property; as if there is talk of a matter, instead of man; see how that works?) focuses on the individual and his rights from the perspective of man being the embodiment of rights.
Conventional analysis tries to frame his ideas in commie vernacular, subverting its power. see how that works?
As far as compelling reason, there is only one compelling argument: personal cognition of facts, meaning, knowing thyself. And this lies at the heart of moral decay, as weak people tend to subordinate their own authority to those considered to be authority, and are being lead by what is fancy, fictitious.
Yes, correct. That is exactly what happens. Perception and misguided reason. Unless, one sees the mirage for what it is: a trick on the mind.
This is the only part that isn't