Know your rights. Know your worth.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
I think so. Another person, common law litigator, Lyn Paladin of Utah, taught a small class in the ‘90s that judges have made their own judge-made common law on top of the statutory laws for licensing. She was a mother of 10, said her religion did not allow her to celebrate or give out her birthdate, so she could even get state Id. She filed a lot of habeas corpus liberty interest motions with local courts whenever she was detained for driving without a license. She taught that now there’s no getting away with it and people are at the mercy of their local police & judges.
I’d love to have a convo with you about this further. Big Picture, 35 years of precedent is nothing.
Wrongfully made precedents can be overturned. A big problem is attorneys and judges and law schools have this “inherent police power” of the states. From the time of Oliver Wendell Holmes, “the law is what I (the judge) says it is” — so we would benefit from some liberty oriented state ballot initiatives and constitutional revisions to check the powers of the states.
That is why they throw out people who favor jury nullification.
The LAW is what the Constitution says. These judges need to be slammed with 18 241/242 + given the fact they act in concert: racketeering causing irreperable harm + waging war on the Constitution.