So many miracles in God's creation of men. A woman's weird food cravings that seems to have her want food that has nutrients the baby needs. Cells from babies found in mothers decades after birth which would help the mother to survive. Majority of sperm swimming to the fallopian tube with an egg attached. And so many more.

The Word of God is the final say. You either believe or you don’t.. Intelligent design Is from God and not a coincidence. Yeah, everything was made from nothing? We are all just random?
Genesis 2:7 “And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.” The bible is mathematically perfect. Amen! Alleluia! The lost will find out real soon. Believe in those aliens that are coming for us, lol

Shawn Ryan's latest episode has two of my favorite people regarding Christianity, John Burke and Lee Stroble. It's a great episode, I definitely recommend.

https://youtu.be/Hu7RhiqC4Nw

Good point!😏

Who created God, then?? Where did God come from? (Mormons will say, the planet Kolob.)! If God can come from nothing, why can’t the Universe come from nothing? I remain a-gnostic, without knowledge.

The "coincedence" is that for millions of years lesser apes had such similar hands to us. As if they developed over the years into what we have.

Intellectually bankrupt.

Wow, this sounds heavy, important, and convincing! It appeals to the passion. Who would want to be bankrupt? No, we want to belong the intellectually affluent.

Words have meaning:

Intellectual

With regards to intellect, it is delineated as such:

1. in = not
2. tel = ter = terra/ base
3. lig = ligere = choose

From a negative perspective, it is an elevated view on matters under discussion, basically, we now would call it: faculty of the mind. Otherwise you would simply act without consideration, automatically, without the mind.

For comparison. Extreme. Your fingers are extremities. So are your hands, arms, legs, feet and toes. They grow out of the base/ ground: ex terra.

Yet, these extremities are also rooted, radical.

bankrupt:

A bankrupted company is usually put under auspices of someone else. A bankrupt intellect therefor has become incapable of independent work.

That is quite the claim and requires extraordinary evidence. Of course, OP has trouble providing such, as he runs with his own frame of mind, and anybody who thinks (mind) otherwise, is called intellectually bankrupt.

It is quite clear that being accused of a lack of ability of free thought has to be rooted in logic, and it seems from the real meaning of what OP is claiming, he is suffering from at least a lack of knowledge, and would be better of to be considered playing the fool and anything serious.

atheist:/ theist

Welll actually, it is funny. From history we would need to contend ourselves with deism and adeism.

Where the [os] ism is coming from is quite the miracle. I guess it has run the same course of demo[s]cracy, as it simply means either those crazy about demonstrations or those racey with mockery. With power of the people, it has nothing in common, as that would be demoskratia.

So what does the-ist mean? They want us to belief that is means the maker or doer of God.

And an a-the-ist? The opposite. a not doer/maker of God.

And guess what. The root: dyeu means: to shine or day. You know: shiny like Aurum (gold) Slav = shine, Silver = shine. Or simply: day. And what do you know what usually happens during day time? Well, at least when you are fortunate enough not to have your sky burdened with scorching of skies. But usually you would see a shiny one ... yes?

However, the greek suffix os/ous means an adjective. It can also be found in the word: andros = man. The root: aner means dynamic energy. os = adjective. Man as a force of nature. Who would have thought.

Anyways, based on the existing phraseology, there is no discussion to be had. OP is using words he has either no shimmer of knowledge of, or he is on purpose trying to hit and run.

subject matter.

However, since we are here to discuss the matter (anthropic principle), and are all interested parties to this discussion, the question becomes: does it matter with regards to the rights of man?

Of course, you've already taken into account that your rights to self-determination, travel, information gathering and sharing, to peaceably assemble, all flow from the fact that we are alive and have these faculties?

Whether one would postulate a Shiny One or not, does not change that fact.

The next question is more interesting: When fulminating like a brainless, alleging intellectual bankruptcy, is anything been shared that is, how did St. Paul say it in connection to bloodlines: (Titus 3:9)

and foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about law, stand away from -- for they are unprofitable and vain.

So, to those who like to be trapped by issues like these, I wish you a lot of happy days. As for me, it makes no sense, and those who call themselves Christian, in my view, are quite vain when thinking that this must be something like winning, but then by default, as if their claims need no extraordinary proof.

Your God, my God, their God. No! they scream. There can be only one! Ours! And thus the passionate and the illogical go to war.

Or as the Living translation has it:

History merely repeats itself. It has all been done before. Nothing under the sun is truly new.

But fear not. At least you can call upon your friend of the imagination to forgive your evil ways.

As for me, I am going to take a few eggs and celebrate the unfolding of a new life, by preventing one from coming into being, boiling it in hot oil for some Sambal Goreng Telor. [:-)]

Happy Easter DEVAS

If you're going to be atheist, at least know something about that which you purport to not believe.

You can't disbelieve something unless you know about that something and why it's not right. Be intellectually consistent.