But you know I’m a Mod and stepping into griefing a Mod just for shits instead of having a civil discussion is an automatic ban
So are you saying because you're a mod I have to address you as an elite and censor my true feelings? I'm not interacting with you as a mod here. I'm interacting with you as an anon who has posted their remarks to my remarks. I've posted Sather's takes on numerous q-influencers and you've casted shade on his name so much that I distinctly remember your name for it. "That's the guy who doesn't like Sather". It has literally nothing to do with you being a mod or with me rebelling against the site rules. Maybe I was hyperbolic by saying you do it every time, ok sorry I should have said "very often in my experience". But I shouldn't have to walk on eggshells just because the person I'm talking to is a mod. What kind of tyrannical shit is that? We're both anons, you just have the ability to silence me.
I can't believe you threw out "Griefing the Mods". That offense is for intentionally making the mods' job harder or falsely slandering them in order to cause the members of the site to rebel against them. You guys should probably update the Side Bar to explain what Griefing Mods actually means, because I've seen it used quite liberally in situations where, if it had been between two non-mods, nothing whatsoever would have been an infraction. I'm not on here giving you shit because of your mod duties, I'm giving you shit because I think your opinion is bad, you didn't answer my direct questions, and I've experienced the same things with you multiple times before. And now you're essentially telling me that because you're a mod, I don't have the right to voice my opinion of your response.
just for shits
I'm not saying what I said "just for shits" I'm saying it because it's my view, and it's a strong one. You're presuming to know my motive for saying it? That's wildly irresponsible dude. You could have just asked me and I'd tell you my motive. Here it is: I do not want people here to be deceived by liars and scammers who infiltrate our movement, and I appreciate anyone who exposes them. Whether or not a particular individual is a liar or a scammer is up for debate, but you didn't ever mention who was "Q-Team peeps" so IDK how I can even have that discussion with you if I don't know whose name you thought was a Q Team Peep and didn't belong in the infiltrator category.
3rd, we Mods could be privy to different info that may or may not be public share-able yet! That’s why we are trusted as such.
Nonsense. You moderate GAW, keep it nice and neat, ban the people who are trying to destroy it or lead it into crazy-land, and boost posts that are high value (all of which I appreciate!). That's literally what a mod does. If you get "secret intel" for being a mod on here, you should probably question where that "intel" is coming from, because as far as I know Q said "no outside comms" and that sounds like a 100% scam. I can't believe I even have to explain this
So no I’m not just going to tell you of all people who, when you didn’t even write the article.
So you're willing to say that people Jordan named in his article are "Q-Team peeps", yet when I ask you to say their names you refuse? I don't understand why. It can't be to protect their identities, because you just revealed that they were named in the article, which reveals their identities. I could go back through and find them, I was hoping you'd speed things up and just say who you meant. Jesus
YOU have no rights to any of his or my behind the scenes info period! Is that clear Anon?!
I bothered to read your comment. It's not too long and it's properly formatted for easy reading.
This isn't grieving the mods. IMHO Brent75 shouldn't be a mod because he literally claims to have internal communications and connections to a paytriot ring. This fact alone should automatically disqualify someone from being a moderator on a Q board. When the old boards were infiltrated by Neon Revolt & his employee's masquerading as a mod (Ronald Swansong) and anons, they were removed swiftly and the board became much more productive and our numbers of users and activity improved significantly.
If a board is compromised, as they have been many times in the past... is it grieving the mods to discuss this phenomenon?
I think there should be a week long stickied poll: Do you feel this board's moderation team has been compromised? Let the comments be the judge because the up/down voat thing doesn't work well at all.
This is so retarded I should be spending my time digging into actual things not meta nonsense. Who's the 'top mod' on here anyway? Like who would make the decision on removing a mod
No I’m not going to read this wall of text. You need to go back and read how you responded to a simple opinion. And you exploded like it was personal. And knowing the person is a Mod, is that how you civility discuss something? No! Only being foolish would one suddenly become attacking, knowing the rules.
So yes ABSOLUTELY I’m going to remind you as I would ANYONE deciding to be uncivil to another Anon or Moderator here. That’s my job and you’ve been here long enough to know better!
We are done here. I’m not discussing this further with you. Respond to me or any other Mod lashing out again and you can sit out until you cool off. There is your overly fair warning Anon.
So are you saying because you're a mod I have to address you as an elite and censor my true feelings? I'm not interacting with you as a mod here. I'm interacting with you as an anon who has posted their remarks to my remarks. I've posted Sather's takes on numerous q-influencers and you've casted shade on his name so much that I distinctly remember your name for it. "That's the guy who doesn't like Sather". It has literally nothing to do with you being a mod or with me rebelling against the site rules. Maybe I was hyperbolic by saying you do it every time, ok sorry I should have said "very often in my experience". But I shouldn't have to walk on eggshells just because the person I'm talking to is a mod. What kind of tyrannical shit is that? We're both anons, you just have the ability to silence me.
I can't believe you threw out "Griefing the Mods". That offense is for intentionally making the mods' job harder or falsely slandering them in order to cause the members of the site to rebel against them. You guys should probably update the Side Bar to explain what Griefing Mods actually means, because I've seen it used quite liberally in situations where, if it had been between two non-mods, nothing whatsoever would have been an infraction. I'm not on here giving you shit because of your mod duties, I'm giving you shit because I think your opinion is bad, you didn't answer my direct questions, and I've experienced the same things with you multiple times before. And now you're essentially telling me that because you're a mod, I don't have the right to voice my opinion of your response.
I'm not saying what I said "just for shits" I'm saying it because it's my view, and it's a strong one. You're presuming to know my motive for saying it? That's wildly irresponsible dude. You could have just asked me and I'd tell you my motive. Here it is: I do not want people here to be deceived by liars and scammers who infiltrate our movement, and I appreciate anyone who exposes them. Whether or not a particular individual is a liar or a scammer is up for debate, but you didn't ever mention who was "Q-Team peeps" so IDK how I can even have that discussion with you if I don't know whose name you thought was a Q Team Peep and didn't belong in the infiltrator category.
Nonsense. You moderate GAW, keep it nice and neat, ban the people who are trying to destroy it or lead it into crazy-land, and boost posts that are high value (all of which I appreciate!). That's literally what a mod does. If you get "secret intel" for being a mod on here, you should probably question where that "intel" is coming from, because as far as I know Q said "no outside comms" and that sounds like a 100% scam. I can't believe I even have to explain this
So you're willing to say that people Jordan named in his article are "Q-Team peeps", yet when I ask you to say their names you refuse? I don't understand why. It can't be to protect their identities, because you just revealed that they were named in the article, which reveals their identities. I could go back through and find them, I was hoping you'd speed things up and just say who you meant. Jesus
I'll remember that.
I bothered to read your comment. It's not too long and it's properly formatted for easy reading.
This isn't grieving the mods. IMHO Brent75 shouldn't be a mod because he literally claims to have internal communications and connections to a paytriot ring. This fact alone should automatically disqualify someone from being a moderator on a Q board. When the old boards were infiltrated by Neon Revolt & his employee's masquerading as a mod (Ronald Swansong) and anons, they were removed swiftly and the board became much more productive and our numbers of users and activity improved significantly.
If a board is compromised, as they have been many times in the past... is it grieving the mods to discuss this phenomenon?
I think there should be a week long stickied poll: Do you feel this board's moderation team has been compromised? Let the comments be the judge because the up/down voat thing doesn't work well at all.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210310223940/https://communities.win/c/General/p/12hkmRkacr/gaw-has-compromised-mods/
4 years ago
round and round we go
Yep. All too familiar. Evspra was correct about Uhtred being alright. He was a mod on the voat board as well, maybe even reddit too.
I'd archive this post and any specific comments you want to have permalinks to.
At this point, let him keep exposing himself.
This is so retarded I should be spending my time digging into actual things not meta nonsense. Who's the 'top mod' on here anyway? Like who would make the decision on removing a mod
I thought it was CM but he's apparently gone
Wayback Machine
https://web.archive.org/web/20250424074940/https://greatawakening.win/p/19AxLLSLYG/the-q-movement-is-getting-infilt/c/
https://web.archive.org/web/20250424075132/https://greatawakening.win/p/19AxLLSLYG/x/c/4eSk0FGNY9N
https://web.archive.org/web/20250424075537/https://greatawakening.win/logs (April 24 2025 snapshot)
Archive Today
https://archive.ph/PJX4G
https://archive.ph/tOjm1
https://archive.ph/uGI6Z
No I’m not going to read this wall of text. You need to go back and read how you responded to a simple opinion. And you exploded like it was personal. And knowing the person is a Mod, is that how you civility discuss something? No! Only being foolish would one suddenly become attacking, knowing the rules.
So yes ABSOLUTELY I’m going to remind you as I would ANYONE deciding to be uncivil to another Anon or Moderator here. That’s my job and you’ve been here long enough to know better!
We are done here. I’m not discussing this further with you. Respond to me or any other Mod lashing out again and you can sit out until you cool off. There is your overly fair warning Anon.