Everything you just read above from Brian Cates is bullshit.
They executed John McCain for his crimes.
Q predicted his death exactly one month (to the minute, even taking into consideration a daylight savings discrepancy).
Just in case you were confused about whether or not he was wearing an ankle monitor vs a cast, he switched feet -- just to drive it home.
He was put down on national dog day.
This is toddler shit. 99% of those who follow Q know it. It's probably the most well-known Q proof of all time.
Explain to me how we go from Q being so in control that they can execute a misbehaving senator, to:
What if almost HALF OF THIS BRAVE PRESIDENT'S US CONGRESS IS COMPROMISED and is CURRENTLY UNDER THE CONTROL OF THIS INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL CONGLOMERATE?
That position probably winds the clock back prior to Q even making themselves known.
Remember, Hillary didn't challenge Trump's victory. Are you kidding me? Hillary ... did ... not ... challenge ... She was so scared shitless that she wouldn't even make an appearance. This was more than a year prior to Q revealing themselves.
We are in a privileged position of knowing that everything unfolding today is a movie. The opposition at this point are, at worst, Sun Tzu converted spies. They're actors playing their part.
I don't care much for Brian Cates. His writing style is extremely condescending, treating everyone as if they're buffoons and he's the only one with real information -- when in reality he was against Q until late in the game.
Many of you truly do not understand what you have been watching for the past 10 years. You really don't grasp it.
Neither did you Brian.
I can't see how even normies don't read that as being condescending.
I do enjoy a good devil's avocado. Glad to see an alternative view.
I haven't read the post - maybe I'll get back to it - but I do like a good avocado, so I read yours.
I'll just comment that Cates doesn't write for us, he rights for a much more normie level of the broader community. I don't need to like him to see that he might be contributing to the work.
Final point (before reading Cates' essay), working out how and where "you're watching a movie' applies, in what sectors, etc, takes a LOT of grunt work and healthy examination, considering lots of conflicting arguments.
But I do wonder about the Ukraine situation now. Pre-Jan 2025, I was pretty sure Zelensky was a flipped piece and a white-hat controlled instrument (captured piece). But now, I'm not so sure. His constant gainsaying of Trump is curious...
Here's an alternative point of view.
Everything you just read above from Brian Cates is bullshit.
They executed John McCain for his crimes.
Q predicted his death exactly one month (to the minute, even taking into consideration a daylight savings discrepancy).
Just in case you were confused about whether or not he was wearing an ankle monitor vs a cast, he switched feet -- just to drive it home.
He was put down on national dog day.
This is toddler shit. 99% of those who follow Q know it. It's probably the most well-known Q proof of all time.
Explain to me how we go from Q being so in control that they can execute a misbehaving senator, to:
That position probably winds the clock back prior to Q even making themselves known.
Remember, Hillary didn't challenge Trump's victory. Are you kidding me? Hillary ... did ... not ... challenge ... She was so scared shitless that she wouldn't even make an appearance. This was more than a year prior to Q revealing themselves.
We are in a privileged position of knowing that everything unfolding today is a movie. The opposition at this point are, at worst, Sun Tzu converted spies. They're actors playing their part.
I don't care much for Brian Cates. His writing style is extremely condescending, treating everyone as if they're buffoons and he's the only one with real information -- when in reality he was against Q until late in the game.
Neither did you Brian.
I can't see how even normies don't read that as being condescending.
I do enjoy a good devil's avocado. Glad to see an alternative view.
I haven't read the post - maybe I'll get back to it - but I do like a good avocado, so I read yours.
I'll just comment that Cates doesn't write for us, he rights for a much more normie level of the broader community. I don't need to like him to see that he might be contributing to the work.
Final point (before reading Cates' essay), working out how and where "you're watching a movie' applies, in what sectors, etc, takes a LOT of grunt work and healthy examination, considering lots of conflicting arguments.
But I do wonder about the Ukraine situation now. Pre-Jan 2025, I was pretty sure Zelensky was a flipped piece and a white-hat controlled instrument (captured piece). But now, I'm not so sure. His constant gainsaying of Trump is curious...