I made this comment to a post earlier today, but I thought it was worth its own post. I can't believe I had never looked this up before. Am I missing something? A jet engine is OPTIMIZED to burn jet fuel the most efficiently possible. Jet fuel burning in a building fire is NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO REACH THAT TEMPERATURE! (and even that would not melt steel!) This discrepancy, if as simple as it appears to be, should have been broadcast loud and far long ago. Perhaps this simple fact, if indeed as simple as it seems to be, so clearly indicates the official 9/11 narrative absolutely can't be true, is the reason it seems to have been buried all these years. Please correct me if this is not as simple as it seems.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (103)
sorted by:
"Rivers of molten softened steel!"
I have wondered about that. Did they get any samples of the melt?
There was supposedly a lot of aluminum on the building.
Any serious investigation would EASILY prove the entire operation one way or another. Fact is, there has been an active SUPPRESSION of an investigation. So no, I doubt the steel was ever sampled, or if it has, it's been suppressed.
You CAN however, watch this very interesting documentary:
https://odysee.com/@MakeOrwellFictionAgain:d/hy.poth.e.sis---Full-Movie-(Steven-Jones-documentary):b
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nF2yixhc4Fw
There was a lot of aluminum in the airplane. The fuselage, deck, wings, and tail were made of aluminum.