Julian Assange and His Family Attend Funeral for Pope Francis | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald
Julian Assange and his family paid their respects at Pope Francis's funeral, reflecting on the pontiff's support during his tumultuous journey. This poignant moment underscores a complex relationship intertwined with political intrigue.
Correct. This picture is photoshopped. Look at the shadows that his chin casts on his chest, which goes to the right, and hers which goes to the left. Also darker shadows on her in general, he looks like a giant of like 7’ tall which she’s not, and there’s clearly a cut line around his suit/body. If you can’t tell it’s a fake picture then you are a gay retard
<facepalm>
OK, what would be the PURPOSE behind photoshopping a photo like this? Why? Do you think there is some super-high secret operation going on here so that for some reason, Assange's 'family' released a photoshopped pic to somehow prove he's in the Vatican while actually, he's working hard in a deep, hidden bunker cracking secrets and investigating the Epstein Client list?
Talk about retarded.
His body and head are leaning to the right. Her head is leaning to the left. A noon-day sun high at about 75/80 degrees in the middle of the sky would cast shadows just as they appear in the photo. The angles align fully.
What about the angle of the shadow crossing the street lamp pillar? Well, that ll depends on WHAT is casting the shadow, doesn't it?
Height? What if she is sitting or resting on a barrier, a fence or something? Gee, i wonder if they have those in the Vatican? If she was sitting on some sort of seat, rock or other, this is exactly how she would look next to her husband who is standing.
Look at the kids. They are pooped. Tuckered out. So, is it unreasonable to think that mum took a seat resting on something? Doh.
Let's take a look at where they are (according to the photo):
https://www.romawonder.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/st-peter-basilica-vatican-city-rome.jpg
If the photo is real, then they clearly appear to be located on the Via della Conciliazione (according to the photo) just before the intersection with Via San Pio X. Outside the Anno MCMXLIII.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/00120+Vatican+City/@41.9020736,12.462368,18.04z/data=!4m6!3m5!1s0x1325890a57d42d3d:0x94f9ab23a7eb0!8m2!3d41.902916!4d12.453389!16zL20vMDd5dHQ?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDQyMy4wIKXMDSoJLDEwMjExNjM5SAFQAw%3D%3D
Do they have low seats there? Why yes, yes they do.
https://imgur.com/a/nQIUIw6
The angles are fully consistent with the idea that Mrs Assange is seated on that public stone bench that is about 3 meters from the pillar upholding the street light at the corner of Via della Conciliazione and Via San Pio X, a shot taken to include the Basilica in the background.
I didn't introduce the 'retard' element here. You did.
These sorts of wishful hypotheses aren't helpful here. You may think you're somehow keeping the retarded element in check, but ...
The premise that this photo is (for what reason?) photoshopped is retardation on steroids. Put your brainpower to better use, fren.
https://x.com/wikileaks/status/1916055022233677843
She appears to be standing.
Hmmm....
Great catch.
Yes, indeed. So it appears, after all, that she is rather short compared with Julian, and the premise that "this photo is not real: she's not nearly that short" is factually off the mark, but so was my premise (kek, because I simply accepted your assertion that she ain't that short) that she was sitting in the Vatican pic.
(https://content.api.news/v3/images/bin/b54fa97020a1992eed7600fc10566ad1)
Hard to know her exact height, but in this pic, she definittely comes off as short.
https://assets.nst.com.my/images/articles/BRITAIN-ASSANGE_1010_1665399044.jpg
Asssange himself is reported 6ft 2inches.
So, where do you stand now? Do you still think that the picture if fake/photoshopped?
And if so, WHY do you think they put out a photoshopped pic?
(I'm just curious, because I personally think that motive needs to be considered when evaluating certain actions.)
Personally, I hold to the conclusion that the photo is a real photo, and I still think its short-sighted (well, lame) to just come out (like Fatlux did) asserting its fake and you're retarded if you don't think so, based on such weak reasoning...
hey, but seriously, nice catch with the wikipic.