How do your arguments in any way nullify the advice given in the article?
If you actually knew about Sather, you'd know your UFO bullshit is bullshit. Sather thinks they're generally advanced military tech, not extraterrestrials.
Jordan Sather is among the least "fruitcakey" influencers out there.
If your hot take from my post is that I'm angry, that's on you and your inability to comprehend words.
How do your arguments in any way nullify the advice given in the article?
Jordan Sather is among the least "fruitcakey" influencers out there.
I categorically reject any named person who attempts to set themselves up as an influencer in the Q movement. If your name isn't Trump, nobody cares.
If you can't fathom why, then here's a little help: Jerome Corsi, Jack Posobiec, Alex Jones and associates, Ron Watkins, NeonRevolt, SerialBrain2.
There's no reason to suffer influencers in the Q movement, who build their little followings to eventually lead astray. Again, this is an anon movement.
If Jordan Sather cared to influence Q followers, he could have posted the data anonymously and, if the data was good, would have been widely seen and recommended.
If people won't participate trying to liberate the world unless they get paid, or demand to have their names revered, then who gives a shit what they have to say?
There's no reason to trust Jordan Sather, that he's actually not a sleeper Mossad agent ready to make us all appear like fools once he's firmly established himself as a leader in the Q movement -- if his information is good then discuss the good information. If the information is being used to promote Jordan Sather (which it is) then that's a different story. The damage would be in the potential that he could pull a Ron Watkins like Ron did on HBO.
Your approach would leave the Great Awakening rudderless. Leadership is key. You may call them "influencers" but that's the role they play. Like it or not, that's how humans work. It's up to us to discern good leaders, but your blanket approach would stall the movement as surely as infiltrators.
The point remains that you don't know Sather's work well enough to stand in judgement of it with any credibility. I don't particularly TRUST anybody, but Sather is among those whom I've found the least reason to distrust.
Jordan Sather is among the least "fruitcakey" influencers out there.
If your hot take from my post is that I'm angry, that's on you and your inability to comprehend words.
I categorically reject any named person who attempts to set themselves up as an influencer in the Q movement. If your name isn't Trump, nobody cares.
If you can't fathom why, then here's a little help: Jerome Corsi, Jack Posobiec, Alex Jones and associates, Ron Watkins, NeonRevolt, SerialBrain2.
There's no reason to suffer influencers in the Q movement, who build their little followings to eventually lead astray. Again, this is an anon movement.
If Jordan Sather cared to influence Q followers, he could have posted the data anonymously and, if the data was good, would have been widely seen and recommended.
If people won't participate trying to liberate the world unless they get paid, or demand to have their names revered, then who gives a shit what they have to say?
There's no reason to trust Jordan Sather, that he's actually not a sleeper Mossad agent ready to make us all appear like fools once he's firmly established himself as a leader in the Q movement -- if his information is good then discuss the good information. If the information is being used to promote Jordan Sather (which it is) then that's a different story. The damage would be in the potential that he could pull a Ron Watkins like Ron did on HBO.
Your approach would leave the Great Awakening rudderless. Leadership is key. You may call them "influencers" but that's the role they play. Like it or not, that's how humans work. It's up to us to discern good leaders, but your blanket approach would stall the movement as surely as infiltrators.
The point remains that you don't know Sather's work well enough to stand in judgement of it with any credibility. I don't particularly TRUST anybody, but Sather is among those whom I've found the least reason to distrust.