Start at 8.30 when the third person arrives:

https://odysee.com/@thatchannel:4/LL-Complete-2025-04a-11---Cal-Washington-and-Govinda-Tidball---UCC-Filing-Now-in-Effect:0

Tell me what you guys think of this. I have to say that it looks like it is happening at the same time as the plan.

Another victory over the cabal?

It chimes along somewhat with the increasing movement in the UK to challenge the legal basis for Local Authorities to 'demand' Council Tax, by trying to frighten non-payers with official looking and sounding paperwork using certain legalese, capital letters etc that may not actually have standing. Also the timing is interesting now that Trump has come out an announced he wants abolition of income tax as a policy.

Will be watching as this looks interesting. If there is really any kind of official documentation to prove the strrawman theory, thats huge.

Marking for view when time allows

I see a lot of parallels with the plan.

Trump moving to back the dollar with gold, resources and bitcoin instead of it being fiat ( or as these guys would say, backed by birth certificate securities )

I see that Trump plans to end income tax and

they pretty much said "Fraud vitiates everything" and "Nothing can stop what is coming" using slightly different words.

They also used the word "awakening" and various biblical ideas.

These guys seem to be shoulder to shoulder with us.

Pretty interesting, even though I am curious to see any tangible real world effect.

Here is the summary by Grok regarding these filings:

Can you sumarize what the UCC filing by Govinda Tidbal is all about?

4 posts

15 web pages

The UCC filing by Govinda Tidball, as outlined in various online sources, refers to a series of Uniform Commercial Code (UCC-1) financing statements filed in March 2025 with the Travis County Clerk’s Office in Texas (Filing #2025023588 and #2025025325). These filings are presented as a "lawful redemption declaration" aimed at challenging the legitimacy of financial instruments tied to birth certificates, which Tidball and associates like Cal Washington claim are fraudulent securities used to enslave individuals through deceptive legal and financial systems.
Key Points of the UCC Filing:
Claim of Fraudulent Birth Certificates: Tidball asserts that birth certificates are non-consensual, fraudulent securities instruments that create a "corporation" of an individual, treating them as collateral for national debt. This is rooted in a narrative that the umbilical cord and placenta are falsely treated as a "deceased twin" to enslave the living person.

Legal and Commercial Implications: The filings establish an "irrevocable claim" over assets, transactions, and derivatives linked to these alleged fraudulent instruments. They demand that financial and government institutions disclose any involvement with such securities under penalty of perjury, with non-compliance leading to liens, asset seizure, and legal consequences under laws like Misprision of Fraud, Misprision of Felony, and RICO.

Enforcement and Public Notice: The filings are recorded as public notices, enforceable under international commercial and "natural law," and are positioned as a "perfected claim" that cannot be legally contested unless rebutted within 30 days. Tidball signs these notices as "Sui Juris" (self-governing) and invokes UCC 1-308 to reserve rights.

Philosophical and Spiritual Framing: The filings are part of a broader movement termed the "Great Restoration," with Tidball operating under "Abrahamic Law" and claiming to end systemic fraud that enslaves individuals, emphasizing freedom and sovereignty.

Context and Controversy:
Sovereign Citizen Influence: The filings align with sovereign citizen or redemption movement ideologies, which often challenge government authority and financial systems using unconventional legal interpretations. These movements are controversial and frequently debunked or dismissed by legal authorities.

Skepticism and Challenges: Posts on platforms like X and web sources indicate that Tidball’s claims have faced scrutiny, with some labeling them as debunked or legally unfounded. Critics argue the filings misinterpret UCC laws, which are typically used by creditors to secure loans, not to challenge systemic fraud.

Practical Impact: There’s no clear evidence in the provided sources that these filings have achieved tangible legal or financial outcomes, such as asset seizures or institutional compliance. They appear more symbolic, aimed at raising awareness or provoking institutional responses.

Summary:
Govinda Tidball’s UCC filings are a legal maneuver claiming to expose and dismantle a supposed fraudulent system involving birth certificates as securities. By filing UCC-1 statements, Tidball seeks to assert control over related assets and hold institutions accountable, framing it as a step toward global sovereignty and freedom. However, the filings are rooted in contested legal theories, lack mainstream legal recognition, and are met with skepticism, making their practical effect uncertain. For detailed records, the filings can be verified via Travis County Clerk’s Public Records (countyclerk.traviscountytx.gov).

Who are the named targets of these filings?

1 post

15 web pages

The UCC filings by Govinda Tidball (UCC-1 Filing #2025023588 and #2025025325, filed March 2025 with the Travis County Clerk’s Office) do not explicitly name specific individuals or entities as "targets" in the provided sources. Instead, they broadly address institutions and entities involved in what Tidball claims are fraudulent financial transactions tied to birth certificates. The filings are directed at:
Financial and Government Institutions: The notices target "all institutions holding, trading, or benefiting from fraudulent birth certificate securities." This includes banks, financial entities, and government agencies that allegedly use birth certificates as securities instruments, treating individuals as collateral for debt. No specific institutions (e.g., particular banks or government departments) are named in the available records.

Entities Engaged in Fraudulent Transactions: The filings apply to any entity or individual involved in transactions derived from these alleged securities, with threats of liens, asset seizure, and legal consequences (e.g., Misprision of Fraud, Misprision of Felony, and RICO charges) for non-compliance. Again, no specific names of corporations, agencies, or individuals are listed.

General Scope: The language is deliberately broad, aiming at systemic actors rather than pinpointing named targets. Tidball’s notices demand that any such entities disclose their involvement via sworn affidavit within 30 days, under penalty of perjury, but the filings function more as a blanket claim against a system than a list of designated targets.

Why No Specific Targets?
The filings are framed as a "lawful redemption declaration" and a public notice, focusing on establishing a legal claim over assets tied to the alleged fraud. They prioritize systemic accountability over targeting specific parties, aligning with the ideological nature of the claims (rooted in sovereign citizen-like theories). The lack of named targets may also be strategic, allowing the filings to apply universally to any institution or individual implicated in the described activities without needing to specify them upfront.

Verification:
For precise details, the full text of the filings can be accessed via the Travis County Clerk’s Public Records (countyclerk.traviscountytx.gov, phone: 512-854-9188). Without direct access to the filing documents, it’s not possible to confirm if any specific entities or individuals are named within the filings themselves beyond the broad categories mentioned.

If you have additional context or specific documents related to the filings, I can refine the analysis further!

Do DeepSearch

Are there any specific references to IRS in these filings?

15 web pages

The available sources, including web content and discussions about Govinda Tidball’s UCC-1 filings (#2025023588 and #2025025325, filed March 2025 with the Travis County Clerk’s Office), do not explicitly mention the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as a specific target or reference within the filings themselves. However, the filings’ broader context and claims may indirectly implicate the IRS due to its role in federal financial and tax systems, which are often scrutinized in sovereign citizen or redemption movement narratives. Below is a detailed analysis:
Key Findings on IRS References:
No Direct IRS Mention in Filings:
The primary sources describing Tidball’s filings (e.g., public notices, YouTube breakdowns, and related posts) focus on "fraudulent birth certificate securities" and target "financial and government institutions" broadly. There is no explicit reference to the IRS as a named entity or target in the filings’ descriptions or public notices.

The filings assert an "irrevocable claim" over assets tied to alleged fraudulent financial instruments and demand disclosures from institutions under laws like Misprision of Fraud and RICO. These demands are directed at a systemic level, not specifically at the IRS.

Indirect Implications for the IRS:
The filings’ narrative, which claims birth certificates are used as securities to collateralize national debt, aligns with sovereign citizen theories that often criticize the IRS for enforcing tax obligations tied to this alleged "strawman" system. While the IRS is not named, its role in federal taxation could be implicitly included in the filings’ broad targeting of "government institutions" involved in financial transactions.

For example, the filings’ demand for institutions to disclose financial instruments under penalty of perjury could theoretically apply to IRS-related processes (e.g., tax liens or financial reporting), but no specific IRS connection is documented in the sources.

Sovereign Citizen Context:
Tidball’s filings are linked to ideologies that challenge government authority, including tax systems. Sovereign citizen movements frequently file UCC statements to "redeem" their strawman or reject IRS tax obligations, but the sources do not confirm that Tidball’s filings directly reference IRS-specific mechanisms like tax liens or Form 1099-OID schemes.

The absence of IRS-specific language may be intentional, keeping the filings broad to encompass all financial and government entities without singling out one agency.

Limitations of Available Data:
Without direct access to the full text of UCC-1 filings #2025023588 and #2025025325, it’s not possible to definitively rule out minor or indirect IRS references (e.g., in collateral descriptions or addendums). However, the public summaries and notices emphasize systemic fraud over specific agencies.

The Travis County Clerk’s Office (countyclerk.traviscountytx.gov, phone: 512-854-9188) can provide the full filings for verification, as they are public records.

Summary:
There are no specific references to the IRS in the descriptions or public notices related to Govinda Tidball’s UCC-1 filings based on available sources. The filings target a broad range of financial and government institutions involved in alleged birth certificate fraud, which could implicitly include the IRS due to its role in federal finance, but no explicit mention is documented. To confirm the absence of IRS references, you can request the full filing documents from the Travis County Clerk’s Office.
If you have additional details or specific documents, I can refine the analysis further!

Thank you Jesus! I have been waiting for this for decades. Govinda Tidball has been used by God in a mighty way for all of us.

May this ripple become a Tidal Wave in a very short time.

UCC = Uniform Commercial Code. By associating their child with a UCC-1 filing they are making the claim that their child is a commercial product. This is not the way. The whole battle is to remove oneself from the commercial system. Not embrace. It is Govinda that is in dishonor.

This is but a work around and not true freedom from the system. One must operate in the private, in trusts, and embrace ecclesiastical or trust law. The law of the air which is the highest form of law. Law of the merchant UCC is contractual law. Law of the water and the lowest form of law.

Don’t get me wrong, I am not the “system” expert but follow people with higher comprehension than Govinda and with my limited understanding I can see his folly.

Whatever benefit this brings Govinda, it will be temporary and not lasting. Operating in the UCC is on the path of war and in dishonor. There is a peaceful path where one stops warring and comes home to the republic. The Trading With The Enemy Act plays a huge role in this.