There is a LOT of that happening on this site. Posts about things Grok said and comments citing "Grok" as a source. As if Grok wasn't a creation designed to produce certain kinds of results. As if Grok was an actual person compiling all of this 'research' for lazy wanna-be Q adherents to follow, a substitute for this very forum and others like it. Just ask Grok, then share what Grok told you!
Have these people ever asked Grok the exact same question on different days? Consecutively? Does it provide a consistent answer when asked the same question consistently? If it was truly absolutly factual, the answer would never change at all. As it stands you can simply ask it until it gives an answer you like.
So like a 14 year old giving a book report about a book he didn’t read and citing “google”.
There is a LOT of that happening on this site. Posts about things Grok said and comments citing "Grok" as a source. As if Grok wasn't a creation designed to produce certain kinds of results. As if Grok was an actual person compiling all of this 'research' for lazy wanna-be Q adherents to follow, a substitute for this very forum and others like it. Just ask Grok, then share what Grok told you!
Have these people ever asked Grok the exact same question on different days? Consecutively? Does it provide a consistent answer when asked the same question consistently? If it was truly absolutly factual, the answer would never change at all. As it stands you can simply ask it until it gives an answer you like.