AI systems analyze historical data to detect patterns.
And if we’re being honest, history has a pattern.
Most of the major racial movements—whether it’s BLM, the KKK, the Black Panthers, or Neo-Nazis—can be traced back to influence from intelligence agencies or big money funders.
Karl Marx popularized the “Us vs. Them” framework—rich vs poor, class vs class, race vs race.
So, when any modern political figure starts pushing that same divisive narrative…
You don’t need a conspiracy theory.
You just need historical data.
We’ve seen this play before.
And history often tells us who’s behind the curtain whispering
the same message into different mouths.
I just have to laugh. As though AI does anything other than plagiarize. You are talking about racial movements in the dominantly white West. There is no database for tribal conflict in Africa. Where do you think the Zulus obtained their prowess in fighting? By playing tiddlywinks? Where do you think the notion of plunder came from? A university? Let us ask the question: In what way is Cyril Ramaphosa a "modern political figure"? How is he different from any monarch or warlord of the 15th century? Electric lights? Zippered trousers?
Africa does not need "a divisive narrative" to be tribalistic. Tribalism is its native environment. The problem all along with Africa is the difficulty of surmounting tribalism with any higher loyalty. Your "historical data" applies only to the white world. I've heard of "mirror-imaging," but this takes the cake.
You push "history" like it is some kind of fatal force (while using white history as a template for African history), claim that this fatalism ("historical data") applies here, and you finish with...a conspiracy! ("...who's behind the curtain whispering...")
Okay, by your absolute ignorance of anything pertaining to Africa, I have to conclude you are generalizing outside your sphere of knowledge and reference. You think your "theory" trumps facts. Theory never does. And when it is at odds with the facts, it must be discarded promptly.
You are not winning me over. You have no command of the facts. You don't have any grasp of racism or tribalism. You don't seem to realize the African people have been there for millennia. And they have had kingdoms (Nubia, Benin, Great Zimbabwe), overtaken by time and European intrusion. Your ignorance verges on racial disdain. Empty repetition and shouting does not make for an argument.
My Evidence:
AI systems analyze historical data to detect patterns. And if we’re being honest, history has a pattern.
Most of the major racial movements—whether it’s BLM, the KKK, the Black Panthers, or Neo-Nazis—can be traced back to influence from intelligence agencies or big money funders.
Karl Marx popularized the “Us vs. Them” framework—rich vs poor, class vs class, race vs race.
So, when any modern political figure starts pushing that same divisive narrative…
You don’t need a conspiracy theory. You just need historical data.
We’ve seen this play before.
And history often tells us who’s behind the curtain whispering the same message into different mouths.
I just have to laugh. As though AI does anything other than plagiarize. You are talking about racial movements in the dominantly white West. There is no database for tribal conflict in Africa. Where do you think the Zulus obtained their prowess in fighting? By playing tiddlywinks? Where do you think the notion of plunder came from? A university? Let us ask the question: In what way is Cyril Ramaphosa a "modern political figure"? How is he different from any monarch or warlord of the 15th century? Electric lights? Zippered trousers?
Africa does not need "a divisive narrative" to be tribalistic. Tribalism is its native environment. The problem all along with Africa is the difficulty of surmounting tribalism with any higher loyalty. Your "historical data" applies only to the white world. I've heard of "mirror-imaging," but this takes the cake.
You push "history" like it is some kind of fatal force (while using white history as a template for African history), claim that this fatalism ("historical data") applies here, and you finish with...a conspiracy! ("...who's behind the curtain whispering...")
Okay, by your absolute ignorance of anything pertaining to Africa, I have to conclude you are generalizing outside your sphere of knowledge and reference. You think your "theory" trumps facts. Theory never does. And when it is at odds with the facts, it must be discarded promptly.
Nah.. it's common sense. RACISM = SCAM!
Africa has been controlled by outsides for centuries. This guy is a PUPPET for outsiders.
African people do not control their own land. Been that way for a long time.
You are not winning me over. You have no command of the facts. You don't have any grasp of racism or tribalism. You don't seem to realize the African people have been there for millennia. And they have had kingdoms (Nubia, Benin, Great Zimbabwe), overtaken by time and European intrusion. Your ignorance verges on racial disdain. Empty repetition and shouting does not make for an argument.
It's a pattern.
The whole "White is bad" is nothing new correct? Didn't BLM preach the same thing?
Is this guy pushing the same message?