I would like to see your flight path calculations from your analysis. Do you really think the Navy would give a parking space to a rogue Israeli sub? Do you think a enemy sub would draw attention to itself by pulling into a Navy submarine base? I notice a trend where you are defending or running cover for black hat activities. Interesting.
What rogue Israel sub? This is where our ballistic missile subs are ported. Don't you realize the implication? The deduction is that ONE OF OUR OWN SLBMs had been launched by one of our own submarines. Get your head around that one! And apparently (by Q's slip), we have aircraft patrols against any accidental launch.
You guys have Israelis on the brain and you can't see the depth of the Deep State's reach inside our own government. There is no possibility of any foreign submarine getting inside Hood Canal.
So, what "black hat activities" have I been "defending or running cover" for? If you can't name them, I can't be blamed for them. I can't help it if you confuse expert information for something else.
By the way, do you know anything about DEW? Would you be the same person who had the account named DeathRayDesigner that got banned here 11 months ago?
Being that you joined 342 days ago, yip that is 11 months ago, gee what a coincidence. New account at the same time your old one got banned.
DeathrayDesigners last post was May 29th 2024 when he got banned. Your account started on June 13th 2024. Care to elaborate?
Because this person would go out of his way to shoot down any idea that DEW was being used to start fires like the one in Maui.
This person also liked to shoot down every conversation with chemtrails also, kinda like you do.
These are the black hat activities I speak of and the ones you are running cover for.
Yes. I did preliminary mission studies and designs for large airborne lasers, edited the winning proposal for the initial $1.1 billion development contract for the YAL-1A, and conducted mission and classified studies for the constructed vehicle. That was my former handle, but I was not banned. I merely lost my password and had to re-establish myself.
And the idea that a laser would be used to start forest fires---when a kitchen match would suffice---is as nutty today as it was then. Just as the idea that contrails are "chemtrails" is similarly nutty. And since these activities are not happening, that puts you nowhere.
You are absolutely correct that contrails aren't chemtrails. Chemtrails are actually a type of stratospheric aerosol injection. For example, in 2022, British researchers launched a geoengineering experiment - releasing sulphur into the stratosphere under a project named SATAN (Stratospheric Aerosol Transport and Nucleation).
Ever hear the term Sampson option that Israel uses? Ever wonder why Q said we were saving Israel for last. In fact, Q made that statement 3 months before this missile launch.
Don't you realize the implication? The deduction is that the Sampson option would be launched from a group of Israeli SLBM.
First off, it wasn't Ketron Island where this missile was launched from, it was Whidbey Island, which is aprox 50 miles north of Bangor Washington and Hood Canal. Whidbey Island is aprox 20 miles east of the international border and Canadian waters.
Other articles say the missile was launched from near Whidbey Island and not necessarily the island itself which means it could have come from a sub sitting in open waters between Whidbey and Lopez Islands. There is a Naval Air Station on Whidbey Island, but they claimed they lack the capability to launch large ballistic missiles.
Feel free to research yourself, I added a few sites just in case you have trouble locating any on your own.
Your so called "expert information" is nothing but bullshit. So again, why are you deflecting attention away from the more probable theory and placing blame on our own military? Do you need me to include the definition of traitor here?
One thing at a time. The Israeli Dolphin submarines are capable of launching Popeye Turbo cruise missiles from its torpedo tubes. These are not rising missiles such as shown. And it remains true that the entrance to Puget Sound is very closely monitored against intrusion. All of our submarines must surface in order to navigate into the Sound. So, again, what Israeli submarine? They do not have SLBMs, nor the capability to launch a rocket vertically, and they would have been prevented from entry by the Navy, which I trust to do their job, and apparently you do not.
The Samson Option is a deterrent posture, to prevent attack on Israel. It is not a first-strike posture, for it could NEVER prevent a counterattack that would flatten Israel. So, the motivation is impossible. "Saving Israel for last" does not point to this at all; it is very open to interpretation. My interpretation is: "Only at the last will it be possible to assure that Israel and all its people will live in peace and harmony with its neighbors."
My father and brother were navy men, my father in the submarine service, so I am not disparaging the Navy. It is regrettable that some espionage agents were found in the Navy over the past half-century, so they are always a possibility. Thus, a rogue pair of agents in one submarine might have launched a missile before they were taken down. Or do you think that every OTHER government agency is clearly corrupted, but the armed forces are impervious to corruption? I introduce General Milley...
My recollection is that the image was taken from Ketron Island (not where the missile was launched from). Bangor is in the generally north direction, closer than Whidbey Island. There are SSBN boats there; I've been in one. And I live here, so I know all about the geography.
I get my information from being here and looking at the map, not reading newspaper accounts. I also rule out obvious impossibilities, like a sneaking Israeli sub.
Yes he does. He has been intercepting dialogue on black hat activities for years. Infiltration from within. All he spews is bullshit and he is good at it also. I bet someone is paying him, my guess is he is a Fed or Mossad. Anything he says, believe the opposite.
No rogue Israeli sub. Impossible to penetrate Puget Sound. You don't seem to appreciate the specific features of the Sound that allow the Navy to "shut the door."
Get a map. Find Ketron Island. Refer to the news article where the camera was pointing. The view is due north. The trajectory was not toward the camera. That means it was toward the North. What lies North? Russia. The Deep State is always fingered for wanting World War III, so what could be a better provocation than an SLBM launch?
So, basically your questions to me are void. No Israeli sub. No parking space. No defense of black hat activities. Just a deduction of a black hat activity that you want to deny. You're welcome.
I would like to see your flight path calculations from your analysis. Do you really think the Navy would give a parking space to a rogue Israeli sub? Do you think a enemy sub would draw attention to itself by pulling into a Navy submarine base? I notice a trend where you are defending or running cover for black hat activities. Interesting.
What rogue Israel sub? This is where our ballistic missile subs are ported. Don't you realize the implication? The deduction is that ONE OF OUR OWN SLBMs had been launched by one of our own submarines. Get your head around that one! And apparently (by Q's slip), we have aircraft patrols against any accidental launch.
You guys have Israelis on the brain and you can't see the depth of the Deep State's reach inside our own government. There is no possibility of any foreign submarine getting inside Hood Canal.
So, what "black hat activities" have I been "defending or running cover" for? If you can't name them, I can't be blamed for them. I can't help it if you confuse expert information for something else.
By the way, do you know anything about DEW? Would you be the same person who had the account named DeathRayDesigner that got banned here 11 months ago?
Being that you joined 342 days ago, yip that is 11 months ago, gee what a coincidence. New account at the same time your old one got banned.
DeathrayDesigners last post was May 29th 2024 when he got banned. Your account started on June 13th 2024. Care to elaborate?
Because this person would go out of his way to shoot down any idea that DEW was being used to start fires like the one in Maui.
This person also liked to shoot down every conversation with chemtrails also, kinda like you do.
These are the black hat activities I speak of and the ones you are running cover for.
Yes. I did preliminary mission studies and designs for large airborne lasers, edited the winning proposal for the initial $1.1 billion development contract for the YAL-1A, and conducted mission and classified studies for the constructed vehicle. That was my former handle, but I was not banned. I merely lost my password and had to re-establish myself.
And the idea that a laser would be used to start forest fires---when a kitchen match would suffice---is as nutty today as it was then. Just as the idea that contrails are "chemtrails" is similarly nutty. And since these activities are not happening, that puts you nowhere.
You are absolutely correct that contrails aren't chemtrails. Chemtrails are actually a type of stratospheric aerosol injection. For example, in 2022, British researchers launched a geoengineering experiment - releasing sulphur into the stratosphere under a project named SATAN (Stratospheric Aerosol Transport and Nucleation).
Yes - they literally named it SATAN.
https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1915789361221640270
And now -- the UK is moving ahead with its plan to blot out the sun "to stop climate change".
https://x.com/stillgray/status/1915010210340508139
UK Sun dimming experiments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4vxsLwEMhM
High risk British Sun Dimming research
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRiTbpMPThU
(If you've ever been to the UK, you'll know that the last thing it needs is an even dimmer sun!)
There you go again, deflecting (running cover), placing blame on our own Navy.
What Israeli sub? Any of the 6 that Germany sold them prior to 2012. Dolphin Class subs that are nuclear capable.
https://www.defencetalk.com/germany-confirms-sale-of-nuclear-capable-sub-to-israel-41034/
Ever hear the term Sampson option that Israel uses? Ever wonder why Q said we were saving Israel for last. In fact, Q made that statement 3 months before this missile launch.
u/#q916
Don't you realize the implication? The deduction is that the Sampson option would be launched from a group of Israeli SLBM.
First off, it wasn't Ketron Island where this missile was launched from, it was Whidbey Island, which is aprox 50 miles north of Bangor Washington and Hood Canal. Whidbey Island is aprox 20 miles east of the international border and Canadian waters.
Other articles say the missile was launched from near Whidbey Island and not necessarily the island itself which means it could have come from a sub sitting in open waters between Whidbey and Lopez Islands. There is a Naval Air Station on Whidbey Island, but they claimed they lack the capability to launch large ballistic missiles.
Feel free to research yourself, I added a few sites just in case you have trouble locating any on your own.
https://flyingcuttlefish.wordpress.com/2018/06/13/missile/
https://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2018/06/was-there-unannounced-missile-launch-on.html
https://solarismodalis.com/some-areas-we-cannot-expand-on-the-whidbey-island-missile-incident/
Your so called "expert information" is nothing but bullshit. So again, why are you deflecting attention away from the more probable theory and placing blame on our own military? Do you need me to include the definition of traitor here?
One thing at a time. The Israeli Dolphin submarines are capable of launching Popeye Turbo cruise missiles from its torpedo tubes. These are not rising missiles such as shown. And it remains true that the entrance to Puget Sound is very closely monitored against intrusion. All of our submarines must surface in order to navigate into the Sound. So, again, what Israeli submarine? They do not have SLBMs, nor the capability to launch a rocket vertically, and they would have been prevented from entry by the Navy, which I trust to do their job, and apparently you do not.
The Samson Option is a deterrent posture, to prevent attack on Israel. It is not a first-strike posture, for it could NEVER prevent a counterattack that would flatten Israel. So, the motivation is impossible. "Saving Israel for last" does not point to this at all; it is very open to interpretation. My interpretation is: "Only at the last will it be possible to assure that Israel and all its people will live in peace and harmony with its neighbors."
My father and brother were navy men, my father in the submarine service, so I am not disparaging the Navy. It is regrettable that some espionage agents were found in the Navy over the past half-century, so they are always a possibility. Thus, a rogue pair of agents in one submarine might have launched a missile before they were taken down. Or do you think that every OTHER government agency is clearly corrupted, but the armed forces are impervious to corruption? I introduce General Milley...
My recollection is that the image was taken from Ketron Island (not where the missile was launched from). Bangor is in the generally north direction, closer than Whidbey Island. There are SSBN boats there; I've been in one. And I live here, so I know all about the geography.
I get my information from being here and looking at the map, not reading newspaper accounts. I also rule out obvious impossibilities, like a sneaking Israeli sub.
Yup, he tends to lean black hat on comments.
Yes he does. He has been intercepting dialogue on black hat activities for years. Infiltration from within. All he spews is bullshit and he is good at it also. I bet someone is paying him, my guess is he is a Fed or Mossad. Anything he says, believe the opposite.
No rogue Israeli sub. Impossible to penetrate Puget Sound. You don't seem to appreciate the specific features of the Sound that allow the Navy to "shut the door."
Get a map. Find Ketron Island. Refer to the news article where the camera was pointing. The view is due north. The trajectory was not toward the camera. That means it was toward the North. What lies North? Russia. The Deep State is always fingered for wanting World War III, so what could be a better provocation than an SLBM launch?
So, basically your questions to me are void. No Israeli sub. No parking space. No defense of black hat activities. Just a deduction of a black hat activity that you want to deny. You're welcome.