Yeah, I’ll be certain to look more closely at potential click-bait sites in the future. For several years I used to share a link to a convincing Telegram post, but the post has recently gone dark. 🤷♂️
I also struggle with the morality of installing a fake Joe. The only justification I can think of is; that any other option where they didn’t have full (presidential figure head) control resulted in a massive genocide event across many nations. Maybe the baddies can deploy HAARP to liquefy the soil of entire nations, or maybe the vax will kill more if it lays dormant too long without an antidote / detox, or possibly a sky event will hypnotize millions to walk off cliffs like lemmings. They weighed the options & timelines and this was the path that made the most sense in a reasonable timeline.
Certainly as you pointed out, too many people involved in the scam means more opportunity for leaks and even sabotage. Maybe “Military is the only way” to manage command and control from the top, especially if this script has been playing out for 40+ years.
Good point also, there is no practical benefit of being right or wrong about any matter on the Great Awakening. Neither of us will be invited onto Hannity to explain how we “figured it out”. We can only help wake people up. TELLING people what we’ve convinced ourselves of is a waste of time. Skillfully utilizing the Socratic Method to let them develop their own conclusions carries more weight, just as long as 94% of the population eventually wakes up.
It's refreshing to have a discussion where someone isn't attempting to crowbar their convictions on the other! I mean, I have lots of good engagements here, but you and I are approaching this from a very different starting point, and to me, that makes the contrast all the more interesting.
btw, given the scenarios you describe, in that context, such a move would probably make sense. I don't think of things in those terms - I guess there is a fundamental different angle on the threats that Evil has for us - but the context supports your perspective.
On a tangential reflection, I guess we might look at the Q drops (and the adjacent facts/narratives) as a join the dots scenario, where various people join the dots in different ways to create widely different pictures or representations. For example, by analogy, if the join-the-dots page here draws the picture of a dragon, the dragon you see (draw) and the dragon I see (draw) may look quite different. One is large, glowing with blue and green scales, blowing a massive fire breath, and the other is more moderately sized, more sleek, sharper fangs, and big haunches, and the breath is only smoldering.
As an analogy. Not meaning to indicate anything other that a different picture drawn from the same set of 'dots' - data points. (Actually, we probably draw on different sets, drawn from the same meta-set.)
What's the most valuable here, tho, I think, is that we very likely agree on core principles. Freedom, the value of truth, the power of the human liberated from evil, etc. That's what counts. That's what real diversity is. Variations based on the same core principles. That creates unity within diversity. The neo-Marxist 'diversity' however, is variations based on contradictory and conflicting principles, so that there is only unity in destruction and degradation. IMO, anyway...
Good point also, there is no practical benefit of being right or wrong about any matter on the Great Awakening.
I think you may have misread me there. I do think there is of great practical benefit of being - I won't say right or wrong, but rather more accurate or less accurate with regards to - more accurate or less accurate on numerous matters of the Great Awakening. What I mean to say was that in the case of 'fake Joe Biden' narrative, I don't see any practical benefit to being right or wrong. It's not ... consequential.
I don't think that holds for lots of other things. Understanding that much of the upper echelons of the political establishment in many nations (our nations) are controlled by powers we do not see - via corporations, cliques, organizations, etc - has the practical benefit of directing how I choose to engage with the political establishment, who I vote for, how I engage with that level of society, etc. Direct practical benefits.
I just don't see the Biden is Fake yes/no as being something that helps or impacts on my concrete choices.
Yes, most certainly I agree. As long as humanity is liberated from evil in the end.
I dream of a day where we can visit those that we are told were our enemies and break bread with them, exchange hugs, gifts and apologize for any pain we unknowingly caused them in the past because we were duped by a bigger common real enemy.
This Awakening has trained me to question everything, so I'm determined to continue learning how the controlling powers have manipulated us for decades. Collectively we may eventually learn the truth, but a lot of past narratives will likely have to be undone.
Yeah, I’ll be certain to look more closely at potential click-bait sites in the future. For several years I used to share a link to a convincing Telegram post, but the post has recently gone dark. 🤷♂️
I also struggle with the morality of installing a fake Joe. The only justification I can think of is; that any other option where they didn’t have full (presidential figure head) control resulted in a massive genocide event across many nations. Maybe the baddies can deploy HAARP to liquefy the soil of entire nations, or maybe the vax will kill more if it lays dormant too long without an antidote / detox, or possibly a sky event will hypnotize millions to walk off cliffs like lemmings. They weighed the options & timelines and this was the path that made the most sense in a reasonable timeline.
Certainly as you pointed out, too many people involved in the scam means more opportunity for leaks and even sabotage. Maybe “Military is the only way” to manage command and control from the top, especially if this script has been playing out for 40+ years.
Good point also, there is no practical benefit of being right or wrong about any matter on the Great Awakening. Neither of us will be invited onto Hannity to explain how we “figured it out”. We can only help wake people up. TELLING people what we’ve convinced ourselves of is a waste of time. Skillfully utilizing the Socratic Method to let them develop their own conclusions carries more weight, just as long as 94% of the population eventually wakes up.
Carry on soldier, you helped expand my thinking!
Thank you, WMW
Thank you, WMW!!!!
It's refreshing to have a discussion where someone isn't attempting to crowbar their convictions on the other! I mean, I have lots of good engagements here, but you and I are approaching this from a very different starting point, and to me, that makes the contrast all the more interesting.
btw, given the scenarios you describe, in that context, such a move would probably make sense. I don't think of things in those terms - I guess there is a fundamental different angle on the threats that Evil has for us - but the context supports your perspective.
On a tangential reflection, I guess we might look at the Q drops (and the adjacent facts/narratives) as a join the dots scenario, where various people join the dots in different ways to create widely different pictures or representations. For example, by analogy, if the join-the-dots page here draws the picture of a dragon, the dragon you see (draw) and the dragon I see (draw) may look quite different. One is large, glowing with blue and green scales, blowing a massive fire breath, and the other is more moderately sized, more sleek, sharper fangs, and big haunches, and the breath is only smoldering.
As an analogy. Not meaning to indicate anything other that a different picture drawn from the same set of 'dots' - data points. (Actually, we probably draw on different sets, drawn from the same meta-set.)
What's the most valuable here, tho, I think, is that we very likely agree on core principles. Freedom, the value of truth, the power of the human liberated from evil, etc. That's what counts. That's what real diversity is. Variations based on the same core principles. That creates unity within diversity. The neo-Marxist 'diversity' however, is variations based on contradictory and conflicting principles, so that there is only unity in destruction and degradation. IMO, anyway...
I think you may have misread me there. I do think there is of great practical benefit of being - I won't say right or wrong, but rather more accurate or less accurate with regards to - more accurate or less accurate on numerous matters of the Great Awakening. What I mean to say was that in the case of 'fake Joe Biden' narrative, I don't see any practical benefit to being right or wrong. It's not ... consequential.
I don't think that holds for lots of other things. Understanding that much of the upper echelons of the political establishment in many nations (our nations) are controlled by powers we do not see - via corporations, cliques, organizations, etc - has the practical benefit of directing how I choose to engage with the political establishment, who I vote for, how I engage with that level of society, etc. Direct practical benefits.
I just don't see the Biden is Fake yes/no as being something that helps or impacts on my concrete choices.
Anyway, just wanted to clarify that.
A blessing on your day. Me? I ain't worrying!
Yes, most certainly I agree. As long as humanity is liberated from evil in the end.
I dream of a day where we can visit those that we are told were our enemies and break bread with them, exchange hugs, gifts and apologize for any pain we unknowingly caused them in the past because we were duped by a bigger common real enemy.
This Awakening has trained me to question everything, so I'm determined to continue learning how the controlling powers have manipulated us for decades. Collectively we may eventually learn the truth, but a lot of past narratives will likely have to be undone.
God Bless
o7