There is actually very little known about the human subconscious... why it exists, how it exists, where did it come from, what does it do, and why do we even have one? Science knows but we are not taught one scientific fact and it is crucial to understanding us, human beings.
Here it is, please take note.
The human brain emits brain waves. For adults, Alpha, Beta & Gamma waves represent the adult's awake state where we are consciously aware. Delta waves are when we are asleep. In between awake and sleep is the Theta state of consciousness. This is where hypnotists can insert "hypnotic suggestions" (programming) where adults then act upon those suggestions in their awake states without being aware of why they are doing so.
Here is the key. Children from ages 1-7 are stuck in their Theta states when they are awake and conscious instead of Alpha, Beta and Gamma states when they are adults. This means everything they are exposed to is literally going directly into their consciousness exactly the same way "hypnotic suggestions" go into adults from a hypnotist... pure and constant programming.
This pool of exposure (1-7) in-turn becomes the adult subconscious when they are adults. This explains why you might react strangely to certain things as an adult and have no idea why you reacted that way. You are not consciously aware of your subconscious influence.Phobias are one example.
This explains why "the bad guys" are trying to influence children in pre-K schools, TV and movies. Also why they insert this same bad programming into what they see and hear online. It literally constructs a human subconscious in adults that is akin to installing malware into a computer. It influences your experience without even knowing it is there. It is the start of a generational "woke virus" ... or malware.
So, why isn't this taught to every parent on the planet? Indeed why? Once you understand this simple science then, as a parent, you will pay very close attention to what you expose your children to (Drag Queen Story hour comes to mind) and also be aware of your own parenting skills and actions you take daily in front of your children.
I hope this helps.
-The Human Primer
As an electrical engineer, having worked on measuring ECGs 25 years ago, I think the word "emit" is not correct. You can not measure brain waves externally, in fact, it takes conductive gel and sensitive transducers connected to high Q amplifiers to measure these signals.
Other than that; yeah, almost anything that happens in classrooms is to diminish the individual and "socialize" the child into the herd of sheep.
Well, you are correct, other that photos of auras, sensitive tech (like EEG), are used to measure brain waves. EEG is the tech the studies were based upon to determine the awake states of children 1-7 is in theta ranges. However, consider that atoms are communicating at the quantum level and this occurs instantaneously, constantly, and ubiquitously. We are only yet at the forefront of determining exactly what this inter-atom communications actually is... although we have proven the communication is there and is definitely occurring.
"Atoms" are not communicating. Not even molecules. You can make an argument that cells communicate, by transmitting nerve impulses. But a single impulse means nothing, so the definition of communication is not yet fulfilled. The communication ("message received") happens at a higher level.
Not arguing cells communicate (although they do chemically), I am stating that atoms communicate. Many experiments prove the communications are there but we have yet to determine how it is occurring. A few examples.
... there are many other experiments proving the comms are occurring. We just aren't sure how. The common denominator to all the experiments is that they are all made of atoms and all atoms are 99.99% energy... the very fabric of all physical matter.
So, although you are correct in stating that science has not yet determined what this comms are... we have plenty of proof the comms exist.
There are no "comms" unless there is a message. This is information theory, per Claude Shannon. All you are talking about is physical interaction. To elevate that to the level of "communication" deletes the idea of "communicate what?" A book can fall off a shelf, make a thump, and the sound is conveyed across the room. Nobody is there. Are you calling that "communication"? Of what? To whom? The sun shines its light on us, day in and day out. Are you calling that "communication"? Of what? To whom? Plenty of natural processes occur, but they are not "communication."
Quantum entanglement is a fact of nature, not a "comm." So far, the physicists are very careful to deny that it is not instantaneous communication, as the experiments do not support that idea. (But I am intrigued by it.)
DNA experiment: I have no idea what you are describing, since you mingle "protons" and "photons" and it is not clear what is happening by the displacement of the DNA. If all you are doing is establishing a stable resonance, there is no mystery in its persistence.
Heart & Computer experiment: This is a manifestation of foreknowledge, a paranormal phenomenon. No one knows the physical basis behind it. (This is a broad subject area. But seems to require the presence of a mind.)
Every thing is made of atoms, and atoms are 100% equivalent to energy. This is a truism, which leads to a "So what?" Energy is bashed around in normal existence, but this bashing around is not communication. Communication is the transference of information, and information is a signal whose reception reduces uncertainty. If there is no conscious recipient, there is no message received, and no communication. Where there is signal, there is always noise. You are not paying attention to the difference. Nature is full of noise. In some ways, nature would not exist as we know it, without this noise (e.g., kinetic theory of gases).