Ancesstry.com requires 'ownership' of the entries, so that one can trace who placed it.

Ya duh, since 2018

Just another brilliant example of how JackStraw on X.com is a clickbait, fake info and probably disinfo operation, or a grifter at best.

Seriously. How similar is this to the

Ooooh, Zenenski's name in latin means "lord of death" etc? Because someone decided to input that translation into the public-generated Google Translate....

Here is what Grok tells about Ancestry.com. Paint me surprized. Not. Blooming obvious.

Ancestry.com gathers its data through a combination of user contributions and extensive digitization of historical records. Here’s how it works: User-Provided Data: Customers play a significant role by inputting their own information into the platform. When users create accounts, they can build family trees by entering details about themselves, their relatives, and ancestors (e.g., names, birthdates, locations). This user-generated content, including family trees and uploaded documents like photos or records, forms a large part of Ancestry’s database. According to a 2018 report, Ancestry had over 100 million family trees created by its users, containing billions of individual profiles.

How can anons not see how obvious this is? Some dungforbrains input the Biden executed at Gitmo narrative to work by inputting this data into the Ancestry.com data base.

It ain't hard.

And JackStraw disseminates so much garbage....

This ain't a BOOM. It's a pffft like a slow fart.

(Pardon my French)

BQQM! 💥👏