The source of this is (in my opinion) a clickbait operator, a grifter at best, possibly a disinfo operative.
Having been exposed to this stuff in tangible ways for more than 7 years now, it becomes clear how the information sphere is poisoned and manipulated using a variety of favorite narratives.
This identity runs the amg-news website, that pushes a variety of dodgy narratives, including the QFS, Nesara bulldust. Guanatanamo executions (See Real Raw News). Med Beds, and other.
Treat this source as someone in the vein of Charlie Ward. Content she (?) produces is sensationalist content adjacent to certain aspects of the Truth sphere, something it capitalizes on.
Ward and people like this identity prey on and exploit people who are waking up to the truth, and spin them off on fake narratives. The pattern is consistent.
It's not easy reviewing, digesting and processing the information sphere. We're in the midst of 5G global warfare, and there is far more chaos out there than most people know. Meanwhile, some actors opportunistically latch on to the hopes and disappointments of others to exploit them as soft targets.
Common law, corporate law, the manipulation of 'law' maritime law, contract law, etc, are an absolute minefield to navigate. But its a very rich source of sensationalist narratives that can be used to prey upon a sector of the awakened.
These sorts of narratives resurface again and again, and yet, what happens? Tangible results don't matter when you have an emotionally driven belief in something because it delivers a temporary emotional lift or relief.
I've seen a lot of this law narrative, and seen how it succeeds and also how it fails in reality, and over the years this has inoculated me (I would say) to this sort of bulldust. It's not that there is nothing there. It's just that the chaos and quagmire of opinion, speculation, belief and reality is ripe ground for people to inject fake and futile narratives.
Case in point: The Australian govt was hijacked, illegally, in 1973, where treason was enacted to redirect the country down a path where it was removed from the sovereignty of the people to the dominion of various cliques and international rogues. And while that's a fact, it doesn't mean you can just waltz in and say, oh, so its all fake, and it doesn't have concrete impact, and it doesn't require actual, concrete solutions that align with real world and law.
Aussies who have researched this topic will know what I'm referring to. But try taking that argument into a court of law, and you will get the book thrown at you.
Investigate, research, dig. Apply learning and most of all, be self-critical when processing the sort of narrative (assertions) this account is throwing at you. BUT, take care, and question whether the motive of the identity promoting this content is in alignment with yours, or exploiting it.
Q is not about wishful thinking, and Q thinking is concrete, evidence based and reality focused. And there are many who want to tap into an exploit those who have come to question the presented Matrix reality, and their intent is often to substitute that old set of thinking for a new one that serves THEIR purposes and intents.
Realizing this is what it means to develop ...... discernment.
See Comment below for a cursory dig into amg-news.com.
Stickying is good when it brings eyes on, and frogs apply discernment to bust any fakeness, but if the content is dodgy, then I think its better not to sticky, and if there is real content worth developing, then surely more posts would follow?
ps. Just uploaded another comment showing a very cursory dig on the sauce OP.
Whether there is validity in the information or the claims is something we should evaluate separately and distinctly from the sauce, but if the source is deemed 'not friendly' - aka has motives other than the sincere motives of the Great Awakening frogs, then it should be approached with that caution. IMO.
The real issue is separating fact from fiction. There is a lot of opinion, but ultimately, practical results derived from evidence-based work is what is needed.
Personally, I have no doubt that there has been a lot of illegal and unlawful developments in Canada since (or from before) its founding. But there are also a lot of people who want to pretend to have the country's best interests in mind while presenting their own spin and narratives, and they do not really care about making unfounded claims or delivering tangible, concrete evidence and results. Why? Because their prime objective is to exploit, not to actually inform.
The source of this is (in my opinion) a clickbait operator, a grifter at best, possibly a disinfo operative.
Having been exposed to this stuff in tangible ways for more than 7 years now, it becomes clear how the information sphere is poisoned and manipulated using a variety of favorite narratives.
This identity runs the amg-news website, that pushes a variety of dodgy narratives, including the QFS, Nesara bulldust. Guanatanamo executions (See Real Raw News). Med Beds, and other.
https://amg-news.com/author/medeea/
Treat this source as someone in the vein of Charlie Ward. Content she (?) produces is sensationalist content adjacent to certain aspects of the Truth sphere, something it capitalizes on.
Ward and people like this identity prey on and exploit people who are waking up to the truth, and spin them off on fake narratives. The pattern is consistent.
It's not easy reviewing, digesting and processing the information sphere. We're in the midst of 5G global warfare, and there is far more chaos out there than most people know. Meanwhile, some actors opportunistically latch on to the hopes and disappointments of others to exploit them as soft targets.
Common law, corporate law, the manipulation of 'law' maritime law, contract law, etc, are an absolute minefield to navigate. But its a very rich source of sensationalist narratives that can be used to prey upon a sector of the awakened.
These sorts of narratives resurface again and again, and yet, what happens? Tangible results don't matter when you have an emotionally driven belief in something because it delivers a temporary emotional lift or relief.
I've seen a lot of this law narrative, and seen how it succeeds and also how it fails in reality, and over the years this has inoculated me (I would say) to this sort of bulldust. It's not that there is nothing there. It's just that the chaos and quagmire of opinion, speculation, belief and reality is ripe ground for people to inject fake and futile narratives.
Case in point: The Australian govt was hijacked, illegally, in 1973, where treason was enacted to redirect the country down a path where it was removed from the sovereignty of the people to the dominion of various cliques and international rogues. And while that's a fact, it doesn't mean you can just waltz in and say, oh, so its all fake, and it doesn't have concrete impact, and it doesn't require actual, concrete solutions that align with real world and law.
Aussies who have researched this topic will know what I'm referring to. But try taking that argument into a court of law, and you will get the book thrown at you.
Investigate, research, dig. Apply learning and most of all, be self-critical when processing the sort of narrative (assertions) this account is throwing at you. BUT, take care, and question whether the motive of the identity promoting this content is in alignment with yours, or exploiting it.
Q is not about wishful thinking, and Q thinking is concrete, evidence based and reality focused. And there are many who want to tap into an exploit those who have come to question the presented Matrix reality, and their intent is often to substitute that old set of thinking for a new one that serves THEIR purposes and intents.
Realizing this is what it means to develop ...... discernment.
See Comment below for a cursory dig into amg-news.com.
Hi Frac,
I've de-stickied this post. on the basis of your comment.
Thanks Prop.
Stickying is good when it brings eyes on, and frogs apply discernment to bust any fakeness, but if the content is dodgy, then I think its better not to sticky, and if there is real content worth developing, then surely more posts would follow?
ps. Just uploaded another comment showing a very cursory dig on the sauce OP.
Whether there is validity in the information or the claims is something we should evaluate separately and distinctly from the sauce, but if the source is deemed 'not friendly' - aka has motives other than the sincere motives of the Great Awakening frogs, then it should be approached with that caution. IMO.
This one was my sticky. I should have checked it.
Thanks for having my back fren.
kek. I've got to earn my keep somehow!
Use your discernment and explore https://www.themythiscanada.com and see the proof for yourself!
Hey, I'm not saying there is nothing here.
I'm just saying that the person or identity posting this narrative and their assertions do not have our best interests in mind.
I have explored this issue a lot in the Australian context. Like I say, its a quagmire and chaotic soup of fact and fiction.
So yeah, I agree: use discernment.
Addendum: Dick Yardley has done a LOT of work in this area in the context of Australia. You can see some of his research presented here:
https://dawnkelly.com.au/timeline-of-treason/
The real issue is separating fact from fiction. There is a lot of opinion, but ultimately, practical results derived from evidence-based work is what is needed.
See also: (Australian context)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/C7VihvyAAV8B
Personally, I have no doubt that there has been a lot of illegal and unlawful developments in Canada since (or from before) its founding. But there are also a lot of people who want to pretend to have the country's best interests in mind while presenting their own spin and narratives, and they do not really care about making unfounded claims or delivering tangible, concrete evidence and results. Why? Because their prime objective is to exploit, not to actually inform.
so yeah, use discernment.