False. We are Christ first always! I am a Christian before I am MAGA. And if the Trump admin decides that Israel is more important than Christ and America then fuck them. The Conservative Inc. Evangelical grifters are already exposing themselves. Ian Carroll, Candace, Tucker etc. are the real deal. Not Charlie Kirk, DC Draino etc.
It is important to hold our politicians accountable. Trump, Kash, Bondi all of them.
Yeah, I'm not really persuaded by u/pnwhomebrewer 's line of argument.
And, I think his argument actually highlights, inadvertently, the very nature of how a controlled opposition program operates. (Which is not to say that the object of this discussion is controlled oppo. That's a slightly different topic. But if we're to identify who actually could be controlled oppo, we need to understand and be aware of what and how controlled opposition works.)
Hegelian dialectic: problem, reaction, solution.
Applied to a target sector, this becomes "us vs. them".
"If Charlie Kirk, Draino and Ben Shapiro are bad, then obviously Candace, Carroll, and Tucker must be good!!!!"
The fundamental premise of a controlled opposition operation is getting someone to side with THIS side in reaction to, or by pushing away from THAT side (of the binary proposition being offered).
Is it not possible that Charlie Kirk DC Draino and Shapiro (for example) have an ulterior agenda that is not necessarily in alignment with the best wellbeing of their audience, and also that Candace Owens, Ian Carroll, Tucker or whoever, ALSO have an ulterior agenda, that is not aligned with the audience's best interests?
Sure. We HAVE To acknowledge that this is <possible>? The question then goes, is this the case? And the criteria should NOT be "Are they saying what I want to hear?" "does their information align with my (confirmation) bias?"
I think the fact remains, the Q operation was part of a movement that destroyed the power of the mockingbird media (aka legacy) sphere, and cracked open on a global scale, the 'alt-media' sphere.
It should be obvious to anyone with any sort of 5000 ft+ view (or even better, a 10,000ft view) of the infowar that there are hordes and hordes of people and organizations rushing to fill the vacuum that the demise of the Propaganda Media establishment has created.
And this is precisely why, at this time, people - particularly those who have left 'Egypt', need to be wary and full of care.
False. We are Christ first always! I am a Christian before I am MAGA. And if the Trump admin decides that Israel is more important than Christ and America then fuck them. The Conservative Inc. Evangelical grifters are already exposing themselves. Ian Carroll, Candace, Tucker etc. are the real deal. Not Charlie Kirk, DC Draino etc.
It is important to hold our politicians accountable. Trump, Kash, Bondi all of them.
Yeah, I'm not really persuaded by u/pnwhomebrewer 's line of argument.
And, I think his argument actually highlights, inadvertently, the very nature of how a controlled opposition program operates. (Which is not to say that the object of this discussion is controlled oppo. That's a slightly different topic. But if we're to identify who actually could be controlled oppo, we need to understand and be aware of what and how controlled opposition works.)
Hegelian dialectic: problem, reaction, solution.
Applied to a target sector, this becomes "us vs. them".
"If Charlie Kirk, Draino and Ben Shapiro are bad, then obviously Candace, Carroll, and Tucker must be good!!!!"
The fundamental premise of a controlled opposition operation is getting someone to side with THIS side in reaction to, or by pushing away from THAT side (of the binary proposition being offered).
Is it not possible that Charlie Kirk DC Draino and Shapiro (for example) have an ulterior agenda that is not necessarily in alignment with the best wellbeing of their audience, and also that Candace Owens, Ian Carroll, Tucker or whoever, ALSO have an ulterior agenda, that is not aligned with the audience's best interests?
Sure. We HAVE To acknowledge that this is <possible>? The question then goes, is this the case? And the criteria should NOT be "Are they saying what I want to hear?" "does their information align with my (confirmation) bias?"
I think the fact remains, the Q operation was part of a movement that destroyed the power of the mockingbird media (aka legacy) sphere, and cracked open on a global scale, the 'alt-media' sphere.
It should be obvious to anyone with any sort of 5000 ft+ view (or even better, a 10,000ft view) of the infowar that there are hordes and hordes of people and organizations rushing to fill the vacuum that the demise of the Propaganda Media establishment has created.
And this is precisely why, at this time, people - particularly those who have left 'Egypt', need to be wary and full of care.