This is grotesque. I, personally, am not Jewish, so your vicious rant against me based on your own prejudice is evidence enough of anti-Semitism. Or, if you don't like the euphemism, call it for what it is: Jew hatred. Complete with wishes of death and insults.
As for World War II, you blame the victims, not the Nazis? Do I understand you correctly? You now regret, generations later, that your forebears had the moral courage to defend the Jews against annihilation? Too bad the Russians lost 20 million to defeat the Nazis. They must have been stupid, in your way of looking at things. And then you appear to blame Israel for Poland's experience under Russian-Communist rule. I don't recall Gomulka or Jaruzelski being Jewish.
American anons are running around with an imaginary "Samson Option" in their heads. A last ditch retaliation against an aggressor is only what every other nuclear-armed country is prepared to do. There is no evidence of any other policy, and the imaginary policy is worthless.
Conflating communists who happen to be Jewish with Jews at large is no more rational than conflating mob criminals who happen to be Italians with Italians at large. It appears you don't care to recognize any difference between individuals and the collective. Or appreciate the disproportionate contribution of Jews to science, engineering, art, literature, and music.
Since you cannot establish any legitimacy to the intellectual error of collectivism, there is no point to arguing with you.
My answer: "Because only when we resolve all the other problems in the world will it be possible for Israel to have a peaceful and prosperous existence." Recent events seem to bear this out.
Most of them are zionists&communist bastards supporting cabal and attacking my country,attacking your country (USA ?) too so even if mods would be angry for "blaming all jews" - Here I stand, I can do no other. I do not create division as we are not one with antifa,commies and cabal. Aren't we ?
Here’s a question for you, based in simple human nature:
If you bind people who aren’t guilty to people who are guilty, and accuse them all of either being guilty of the same crime or of intentionally aiding and abetting the same crime, what will be the reaction of people who would prefer to neither commit the crime nor aid in it?
It’s one thing to call out crimes or suspected crimes or opposing action or whatever, or point out that people may be trying to be camouflaged, for whatever unknown reason, but jumping from there to “you’re all guilty!” is wrong.
If there is a glaring lack of calling out crimes from within, do words like yours make it more or less likely for that to happen?
This is grotesque. I, personally, am not Jewish, so your vicious rant against me based on your own prejudice is evidence enough of anti-Semitism. Or, if you don't like the euphemism, call it for what it is: Jew hatred. Complete with wishes of death and insults.
As for World War II, you blame the victims, not the Nazis? Do I understand you correctly? You now regret, generations later, that your forebears had the moral courage to defend the Jews against annihilation? Too bad the Russians lost 20 million to defeat the Nazis. They must have been stupid, in your way of looking at things. And then you appear to blame Israel for Poland's experience under Russian-Communist rule. I don't recall Gomulka or Jaruzelski being Jewish.
American anons are running around with an imaginary "Samson Option" in their heads. A last ditch retaliation against an aggressor is only what every other nuclear-armed country is prepared to do. There is no evidence of any other policy, and the imaginary policy is worthless.
Conflating communists who happen to be Jewish with Jews at large is no more rational than conflating mob criminals who happen to be Italians with Italians at large. It appears you don't care to recognize any difference between individuals and the collective. Or appreciate the disproportionate contribution of Jews to science, engineering, art, literature, and music.
Since you cannot establish any legitimacy to the intellectual error of collectivism, there is no point to arguing with you.
The dissembling in this thread is off the charts.
“Why do you suppose we saved Israel for last?”
My answer: "Because only when we resolve all the other problems in the world will it be possible for Israel to have a peaceful and prosperous existence." Recent events seem to bear this out.
Here’s a question for you, based in simple human nature:
If you bind people who aren’t guilty to people who are guilty, and accuse them all of either being guilty of the same crime or of intentionally aiding and abetting the same crime, what will be the reaction of people who would prefer to neither commit the crime nor aid in it?
It’s one thing to call out crimes or suspected crimes or opposing action or whatever, or point out that people may be trying to be camouflaged, for whatever unknown reason, but jumping from there to “you’re all guilty!” is wrong.
If there is a glaring lack of calling out crimes from within, do words like yours make it more or less likely for that to happen?