If you destroy the ways in and out of a bunker, it is effectively destroyed. If you destroy the air handling it becomes uninhabitable. So, if that was the goal then President Trump succeeded.
What good is it if you can no longer get to it? Even if it's fully intact it's no good.
If there really was uranium still there, it would be uninhabitable. Even if there wasn't, the Iranians wouldn't have been able to remove the equipment that was processing the uranium - and they are radioactive as well.
If you destroy the ways in and out of a bunker, it is effectively destroyed. If you destroy the air handling it becomes uninhabitable. So, if that was the goal then President Trump succeeded.
What good is it if you can no longer get to it? Even if it's fully intact it's no good.
I think I heard someone say,
Data (like 3 TB on DVDs) might survive. SEALING the gates keeps the rats out.
If there really was uranium still there, it would be uninhabitable. Even if there wasn't, the Iranians wouldn't have been able to remove the equipment that was processing the uranium - and they are radioactive as well.