Not a chance those tanks are meant for protecting the port from any missile attacks, airborne or even terrorist attacks. The tanks couldn't be used for crowd control in case of rioting. The tanks would be useless for almost any of those scenarios.
There are several good reasons to have tanks at the port.
#1: The tanks will be loaded onto a military transport ship and sent overseas.
#2: The tanks will be loaded onto a cargo ship and sent overseas.
#3: If any trucks, trains or large vehicles tried to block the port for any reason... the tanks could be used to clear a path.
I'm wondering about the wall of shipping containers surrounding the tanks. When you're right next to an elevated highway where everyone passing by can look over and see the tanks... hiding them isn't much of an option. Notice the containers nearest the highway are stacked 3-high, vs. 2-high away from the highway... and that the tanks are right up against the 3-high section? Someone must have thought they could be hidden that easily.
Someone must have thought they could be hidden that easily.
Or maybe it was intended to look like it was being hidden.
Enjoy the show!
If you "try" to hide something, and then do a piss poor job of actually hiding it, and you are also creating a movie, and you are creating a "precipice" as part of that movie, and you show military weapons for all to see, what does that do emotionally? How does it promote a narrative?
In 1942, a couple months after WWII began in the US, there was an "attack" by the Japanese against Los Angeles. Prior to the attack, there was a lot of propaganda (media and military equipment) motivating that belief that they were going to attack there. The military equipment there was primed for battle and everyone could see it. I'm not sure if there were tanks, but there was plenty of stuff there, and people were scared to death (according to the media). When the Japanese attacked, there was a lot of firepower. It went off for a while. There were five reported deaths.
As it turns out however, there weren't an actual Japanese. According to the official report, there was a "weather balloon" and the military were fighting nothing.
Almost exactly what happened in the false flag that was the prelude to the Vietnam War, but I'm sure those are unrelated.
Of course officially it wasn't intentional. It was an accident. It did motivate beliefs though. A lot of them. There were an increase in anti-Japanese beliefs (even though the Japanese did nothing there). There was fear of bringing the war to our home (even though that was all done by ourselves). The associated propaganda and the event itself created beliefs that stayed with us. We were afraid. We were motivated to draft our children. We were motivated to move troops to Europe so we could kill the "enemy" before they killed us.
These types of "shows" are required to prompt that narrative. The battle is far away. Those shows bring the battle into our homes (see 911 or Pearl Harbor). When the battle is in our homes, that is where the precipice begins.
As a note: the only time I can recall actually using tanks in LA was in the movie Battle: Los Angeles, where there was an alien invasion on the beach. The whole thing was about the fear of that invasion in our homes, in the US.
There have been "Aliens" sighted above LA recently (small scale), prompting ideas that they are practicing Project Blue Beam in the area.
So I suggest:
#4 The Precipice: -> Project Blue Beam, and Alien Invasion in LA are also possible reasons for "hidden" tanks in LA.
China used tanks extensively in numerous cities to crush the 1989 Tiennemen Square protests. Considering how the rest of the world basically ignored what China did to its own people, perhaps the USA could learn a lesson from Chima on how to deal with US "peaceful protests."
If you have never seen the Tieneman Square footage of what crowds of human bodies being run over by tanks looks like, you should check it out- warning, it's pretty gruesome.
Not a chance those tanks are meant for protecting the port from any missile attacks, airborne or even terrorist attacks. The tanks couldn't be used for crowd control in case of rioting. The tanks would be useless for almost any of those scenarios.
There are several good reasons to have tanks at the port.
#1: The tanks will be loaded onto a military transport ship and sent overseas. #2: The tanks will be loaded onto a cargo ship and sent overseas.
#3: If any trucks, trains or large vehicles tried to block the port for any reason... the tanks could be used to clear a path.
I'm wondering about the wall of shipping containers surrounding the tanks. When you're right next to an elevated highway where everyone passing by can look over and see the tanks... hiding them isn't much of an option. Notice the containers nearest the highway are stacked 3-high, vs. 2-high away from the highway... and that the tanks are right up against the 3-high section? Someone must have thought they could be hidden that easily.
Probably there to keep people from getting near them rather than hide them. Otherwise they’d have to post Guards as is standard procedure.
Or maybe it was intended to look like it was being hidden.
If you "try" to hide something, and then do a piss poor job of actually hiding it, and you are also creating a movie, and you are creating a "precipice" as part of that movie, and you show military weapons for all to see, what does that do emotionally? How does it promote a narrative?
In 1942, a couple months after WWII began in the US, there was an "attack" by the Japanese against Los Angeles. Prior to the attack, there was a lot of propaganda (media and military equipment) motivating that belief that they were going to attack there. The military equipment there was primed for battle and everyone could see it. I'm not sure if there were tanks, but there was plenty of stuff there, and people were scared to death (according to the media). When the Japanese attacked, there was a lot of firepower. It went off for a while. There were five reported deaths.
As it turns out however, there weren't an actual Japanese. According to the official report, there was a "weather balloon" and the military were fighting nothing.
Almost exactly what happened in the false flag that was the prelude to the Vietnam War, but I'm sure those are unrelated.
Of course officially it wasn't intentional. It was an accident. It did motivate beliefs though. A lot of them. There were an increase in anti-Japanese beliefs (even though the Japanese did nothing there). There was fear of bringing the war to our home (even though that was all done by ourselves). The associated propaganda and the event itself created beliefs that stayed with us. We were afraid. We were motivated to draft our children. We were motivated to move troops to Europe so we could kill the "enemy" before they killed us.
These types of "shows" are required to prompt that narrative. The battle is far away. Those shows bring the battle into our homes (see 911 or Pearl Harbor). When the battle is in our homes, that is where the precipice begins.
As a note: the only time I can recall actually using tanks in LA was in the movie Battle: Los Angeles, where there was an alien invasion on the beach. The whole thing was about the fear of that invasion in our homes, in the US.
There have been "Aliens" sighted above LA recently (small scale), prompting ideas that they are practicing Project Blue Beam in the area.
So I suggest:
#4 The Precipice: -> Project Blue Beam, and Alien Invasion in LA are also possible reasons for "hidden" tanks in LA.
Not promoting it...
Just sayin'.
China used tanks extensively in numerous cities to crush the 1989 Tiennemen Square protests. Considering how the rest of the world basically ignored what China did to its own people, perhaps the USA could learn a lesson from Chima on how to deal with US "peaceful protests."
If you have never seen the Tieneman Square footage of what crowds of human bodies being run over by tanks looks like, you should check it out- warning, it's pretty gruesome.
There’s 28 Tanks there.
Enough for 2 Armored Companies. Probably not there for Missile Defense given they appear to be MBTs.
Looks like the wind blew the covers off a few of them. Or someone took the covers off intentionally on a couple.
“Yea….imma gonna uncover a few just so we all know what we’re stackin here….mmmkaay..”
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1937160090303541277
The tanks don’t seem to have the full optics package on the turrets. Probably headed to Poland as an export model.