Not to defend Grok or any AI, but they are just advanced search engines that take the first 5-10 results and script them. They are still, and will really always be, subject to garbage in garbage out. We can try to train them to ignore certain results, but at that point it's just selective editing by humans. Data Science has the luxury of time and historical data. AI has to make it up on the fly.
They'd never use something like Gateway Pundit, because they're more wrong than right, but it doesn't mean they don't break the occasional big story that would be buried.
My thoughts exactly - "subject to garbage in garbage out". I have actually found myself kind of arguing with ChatGPT. I'll ask a question that I already have a strong opinion on. It will regurgitate the "party line". I will respond with "well what about this" (stating some fact or opinion). It will respond with something like "yes you are correct" or "that's a valid point". It will then give me information that supports the answer that I believed was the truth. It's almost as if I'm pushing it to dig deeper than the first 5-10 results that it is considering when scripting it's response.
I know this will make me seem like a Luddite, but I actually prefer search engines when it comes to some things. Give me all the results and I'll read through them, or skip the ones I don't want. I don't need to have a fake conversation with a machine. I also don't want it saving my convo data for future data mining and targeted marketing, but obviously that's gonna happen anyway.
I believe you. Grok sucks.
Not to defend Grok or any AI, but they are just advanced search engines that take the first 5-10 results and script them. They are still, and will really always be, subject to garbage in garbage out. We can try to train them to ignore certain results, but at that point it's just selective editing by humans. Data Science has the luxury of time and historical data. AI has to make it up on the fly.
They'd never use something like Gateway Pundit, because they're more wrong than right, but it doesn't mean they don't break the occasional big story that would be buried.
That's a fact jack.
and don't you come back no more no more no more no more.
My thoughts exactly - "subject to garbage in garbage out". I have actually found myself kind of arguing with ChatGPT. I'll ask a question that I already have a strong opinion on. It will regurgitate the "party line". I will respond with "well what about this" (stating some fact or opinion). It will respond with something like "yes you are correct" or "that's a valid point". It will then give me information that supports the answer that I believed was the truth. It's almost as if I'm pushing it to dig deeper than the first 5-10 results that it is considering when scripting it's response.
I know this will make me seem like a Luddite, but I actually prefer search engines when it comes to some things. Give me all the results and I'll read through them, or skip the ones I don't want. I don't need to have a fake conversation with a machine. I also don't want it saving my convo data for future data mining and targeted marketing, but obviously that's gonna happen anyway.
Grok not suck. Grok nice. Why you no like Grok? Grok like you. Why you not give Grok chance?
lol
Reminds me of the joke:
White hunters come upon Tarzan and Jane in the jungle. The conversation goes like this:
Hunter: What's your name?
Tarzan: Me Tarzan
Hunter: What's her name?
Tarzan: Her name Jane
Hunter: What's her whole name?
Tarzan: Hole name Pussy!
er....