Not 1000 years. This is plainly visible when one would consider the Hanseatic League. ( red/white flag = trade flag)
What really changed is when first the types like Fugger started to exploit people to produce against lower costs, to break the Hanseatic system. These traders also lend money to several kings and emperors.
Then the next phase entered into execution, with the age of exploration. Well, actually, it was quite simple. You take the cheapest trinkets you can find, and exchange it for spices, highly valued elsewhere, leading to colonialsim.
The Dutch cut in on the action by a limited form of that same trade, based on the ideas of among others: Hugo de Groot (Grotius). Since, that did not sit well with the Fugger types, a new system was established in the city of London on the wings of a color revolution in the UK, when William of Orange became king, expressed in the E.I.C and W.I.C.
This created a different dynamic, a compelling case for the morality: if I don't do it, someone else will. This created the system that is built on maximizing human productivity against the lowest costs.
So, the real inflection point, of what you are saying lies in 1680.
I post something about parliament and you pedantically reply on a minor detail of it which has no bearing at all about what I am posting, are you for real?
Of course, you gather this is a rhetorical question, just as the final part of the sentence you wrote.
It is neither pedantic or derogatory to point out a mistake, as the answer is neither minor nor irrelevant to the point you are trying to make. If that reason escapes you, you already know the obvious answer.
Just follow the the money carriers .... from 1100 - 1680: Traders, bankers, and Pirates ....
Not 1000 years. This is plainly visible when one would consider the Hanseatic League. ( red/white flag = trade flag)
What really changed is when first the types like Fugger started to exploit people to produce against lower costs, to break the Hanseatic system. These traders also lend money to several kings and emperors.
Then the next phase entered into execution, with the age of exploration. Well, actually, it was quite simple. You take the cheapest trinkets you can find, and exchange it for spices, highly valued elsewhere, leading to colonialsim.
The Dutch cut in on the action by a limited form of that same trade, based on the ideas of among others: Hugo de Groot (Grotius). Since, that did not sit well with the Fugger types, a new system was established in the city of London on the wings of a color revolution in the UK, when William of Orange became king, expressed in the E.I.C and W.I.C.
This created a different dynamic, a compelling case for the morality: if I don't do it, someone else will. This created the system that is built on maximizing human productivity against the lowest costs.
So, the real inflection point, of what you are saying lies in 1680.
I post something about parliament and you pedantically reply on a minor detail of it which has no bearing at all about what I am posting, are you for real?
Did you just lose more than a password?
Of course, you gather this is a rhetorical question, just as the final part of the sentence you wrote.
It is neither pedantic or derogatory to point out a mistake, as the answer is neither minor nor irrelevant to the point you are trying to make. If that reason escapes you, you already know the obvious answer.
Just follow the the money carriers .... from 1100 - 1680: Traders, bankers, and Pirates ....
WTF was all that about? Blocked.