https://youtu.be/aWNzq9OWGmY?si=MwIbegPXjuQ-f_0m
A very interesting lecture if you have the time to listen to it. She has an interesting book too.
She talks about how it was physically impossible for the twin towers to collapse in the way we were told when hit by a plane, and that it was likely directed energy weapons responsible for the destruction of the buildings.
This is one of the most convincing takes I've ever heard on how the towers collapsed.
How do you "direct energy" from outside the building to hit primary support points all at the same time, floor by floor? Pre-placed exposives is the only logical conclusion as to how the towers, and bldg7, could collapse the way they did.
I recall watching more than one documentary claiming there to have been a high level of nanothermite in the debris and soil around the site. Areas around the main support columns had been closed for several weeks before 9/11 for ‘painting’.
☝️☝️☝️ Maybe a combination of both tools. Building 7 were most likely pre-placed explosives and the twin towers were maybe a combination of nanothermite, explosives and direct energy weapons. I'm not an expert in this matter.
No, it was a high level of aluminum oxide, melted iron, and ferric oxide---all consistent with a fire in which the vapor of melted aircraft aluminum was ignited and also burned. And thermite is not an explosive.
CNN tell you this haha
I think I said nano-thermite FWIW….which is, of course, explosive and capable of melting steel. You seem very self-assured regarding your 9/11 knowledge tho. Also, iron melting point = 2800F Jet fuel burns at ~ 1800F.
Thermite of any kind is a pyrotechnic, not an explosive (no evolution of hot gases). The adiabatic flame temperature of kerosene (jet fuel) is 3801 F. In rocket engines, it can reach 4000 F. They make it burn at lower temperature (lean mixture) in a jet engine in order to avoid melting the turbine blades, which was a problem for the first jet engines. My career involved jet propulsion thermodynamics. In any case, it does not require that steel actually melt to lose essentially all its strength. 70% of strength is lost by structural steel at a temperature of 600 C (1112 F). (The adiabatic flame temperature of burning aluminum with oxygen is 6750 F. I've seen no one take burning aluminum into account.)
How can paper melt into steel?
https://files.catbox.moe/2u9pb6.mp4
I have a video showing the detonation of building 7 from top to bottom. You can hear the explosions going off.
AND YOU HAVE WON THE INTERNET FOR THE DAY...I also have the video and it shows quite CLEARLY THE EXPLOSIONS STARTING AT THE TOP AND MOVING DOWN...Bld 7 COLLAPSED ON ITSELF...
Also, I remember an article that there were ISRAELI "PAINTERS" IN THE BUILDING and that is WHERE THE PENTAGON WAS HOLDING A FORENSIC AUDIT ON CASH FLOWS TO ISRAEL!!!!!!
Also one of the fire fighters said they were about to pull the building and they needed to get out of there. They knew.
Great work brother!
A directed energy weapon would burn the exterior and melt the outside structural columns. It wouldn't penetrate to the center (columns) or far side. A building is a very poor target for a directed energy weapon...especially one that couldn't penetrate clouds. Or hang around for prolonged periods of time.