They impeached POTUS after he was out of office. Why not impeach Obama
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
agreeing with the sentiment while agreeing with anons who added corrections to how this should have been said.
Obama was an illegit. deep state project foisted on America. Impeach broadly means “to formally accuse someone of wrongdoing, particularly in a legal or official capacity.”
So Congress can impeach Obummer for everything going back to his Senate days.
The Senate can vote to convict Obummer for treason & fraud upon America, and erase his entire [fake] presidency
[an anon raised a point about treason, so here’s a clarification edit, the Senate, in finding Obummer guilty, (if the House were to impeach the entire “presidency 2009-2017 for wrongdoing) would not be finding him guilty in a criminal sense for treason like a criminal court that could impose a penalty for treason — that would be up to a criminal court or tribunal, but the House would impeach 1st after such trial or tribunal & the Senate would subsequently get to do the trial for impeaching retroactively the entire Obummer era.]
The Senate can not vote to convict him of Treason. Only the DOJ can charge him, try him, and do you know - the thing. Impeachment is only a political process - not criminal.
yes
some want a tribunal, and want his entire presidency declared invalid, and as Congress has a duty to the People, they simply pass a resolution declaring that Obummer never was a legitimate president and that treaties he signed, memorandums, laws, and appointments he made were illegitimate.
theft of sovereignty — Vattel, Blackstone, John Locke
Vattel: “sovereignty belongs to the nation; rulers are delegates/trustees of that sovereignty. if a ruler uses power through fraud, foreign intervention, or against the people’s will, he is legitimate. [remedy] The people may resist or refuse obedience, other nations may withdraw recognition of a usurper.”
John Locke: [remedy] “the people have the right to revolt, abolish the government, and restore rightful authority.”
There’s no reason why Congress can’t remedy past wrongs by joint resolution & bylaws declaring that the Obummer years illegitimate decisions are completely null & void.
Except I don't believe they have that power. I think it would have to come from SCOTUS. Don't get me wrong - I'd love to see it. I just don't believe CONgress has that power. Besides - what would stop them from doing that to Trump the next time the demons are in charge? I'm not sure even SCOTUS could do it on it's own without court cases that rise to their level.
Now - John Locke was right. The people could do it if the military didn't stop them. Who knows what would happen at that point though.
you might have the strongest position that Congress does not have the power.
It’s not a numerator that Congress can declare a past occupant of the White House is presidency was not existent.
In contracts law, fraud, vitiates everything. Each president election is a new contract agreement for four years, and whether it is a simple matter that doesn’t need to be a numerator, or it is such a huge deal that it can’t be a power unless it is enumerated, you might have the strongest position, and I’ll agree with you on that