Why is it that with weather manipulation never having been a topic before, EVER, except in some fringe circles - to the point that even among conspiracy theorists it was a fairly fringe theory. There was talk of “chemtrails”, but not even a ton of that, and the main concern there was that it was poisoning us, not that it was cu freak weather events
Suddenly, within 1-2 years it’s gone from not really even being a topic among conspiracy theorists to where even normies are well versed in it, acting like cloud seeding has always been a thing, Meanwhile, liberals, who have said for years that the weather has to be changed to undo the effects of climate change, are now concurrently claiming that there is no way anyone could ever change the weather.
Nevermind the [potential] weather manipulation itself, what the crap sort of sudden mass narrative formation is this, and where did it come from? The stories about weather manipulation formed as fast as the tornados and deluges. Where are they getting these sudden talking points from?
I haven't seen any HAARP critic show any understanding of the system or the phenomena. Nothing but conclusions based on speculation over physics ill understood. I've known about the EM spectrum since high school, so explaining radio waves to me is puerile.
I've seen people make a big deal about NEXRAD sensor locations. Weather will be noticed around those locations...because you can only see what you are able to see. Where there is no NEXRAD, there is no weather observation.
I've seen "normal" weather all my life, so long as you accept that there will always be some "abnormal" weather. That is the nature of a stochastic distribution.
What is a HAARP critic?
Belief is one thing. Facts are another.
I watch weather radar every day and night. I follow worldwide patterns daily.
I've had a lifelong interest in weather. Discussed weather 'facts' with meteorologists and oceanographers (where patterns used to originate). What was 'normal' is no longer and in fact, I predicted this very thing a long time ago, that 'weird weather' would occur become normalized. Cyclones on land, Tornadoes in winter that I called White Tornadoes, flooding rivers from the sky......developed a design for a domed glass compound house that could withstand hurricane winds, etc. You either know the tech behind HAARP or you LARP 'about' it.
If you want to avoid "weird weather," come to the Pacific Northwest. We have none. Either that, or it is continuous. I wouldn't know the difference.
Well then I guess you don't see regular concurrent circular disturbances being pitched from a specific KNOWN official weathermaking sight in China, - that tracks over the northwest and then is picked up by the jet stream to bring it south, colliding with warm southern air being 'pushed' by land units.
The storms generated in the past two decades gave rise to the need to 'Give it a name'. A name that didn't exist before. Being all about the Hispanic revolution, it was given the name 'La nina' to differentiate from the storms from the Gulf which they called 'El nino'. The cyclones on land, they dub 'El Derecho'. They are stronger and longer track than history provides example for. Hence the new labels.
Normalizing weird weather would be the obvious way to hide manipulations.
El Nino and La Nina are names for abnormal heating and cooling phases of the northern Pacific Ocean. Derechos have been named since 1877 and are not cyclones. We may not be on the same planet...