I've gotten 3 and 5 day bans for..."dooming" (aka disagreeing with someone)
Nothing personal anon but I bet you actually were banned for posting crap designed to erode, down to your own level of critical pessimism, the faith and trust of others in the Plan to Save the World, like this:
So what happens when lots of people who are very loud and post a lot (you know the ones I'm talking about, that act like they're part of the official Q press Corp and posts dozens of times every day) decide what The Plan is, but they've historically had really bad judgment
Is it OK to believe in The Plan if the Plan you believe in is completely different than what the Cool Kids Club here says the plan is?
And what happens when The Plan does a complete 180 on us?
With that negative attitude why are you even here among all us stupid happy morons, who are optimistic that Trump and his team might have a plan to counteract that of the satanic enemies of humankind? Do you think your holy mission is to come and save us from our own optimism?
To keep everyone on their toes, remind them of the "research" part of "elite research board" and to prevent this place from becoming an echo chamber where the loudest voices rule all opinion, no matter how idiotic they are, and to prevent well meaning Anons from absolutely tanking our reputation with normies (those people Q tasked us with bringing over to our side) so that we have zero credibility with them by repeating poorly thought out arguments and stances they learn here.
If I can poke holes all in an Anon's stance on a subject, then that means normies can easily do the same. So I'm sort of a stress test for well meaning Anons to practice on, before heading out into the wild, and trying their points out on the normies we're supposed to be bringing over to our side.
I'm trying to get people to a) actually research what it is they're talking about, thus earning that title of elite research board that we've been given b) actually think about what it is they're talking about, not merely repeat stuff they hear, and c) actually learn how to make compelling arguments that will reach normies and have a better chance of getting them to come over to our side.
You don't think those are important quality control issues?
Nothing personal anon but I bet you actually were banned for posting crap designed to erode, down to your own level of critical pessimism, the faith and trust of others in the Plan to Save the World, like this:
With that negative attitude why are you even here among all us stupid happy morons, who are optimistic that Trump and his team might have a plan to counteract that of the satanic enemies of humankind? Do you think your holy mission is to come and save us from our own optimism?
Maybe consider banning yourself?
Qeq
To keep everyone on their toes, remind them of the "research" part of "elite research board" and to prevent this place from becoming an echo chamber where the loudest voices rule all opinion, no matter how idiotic they are, and to prevent well meaning Anons from absolutely tanking our reputation with normies (those people Q tasked us with bringing over to our side) so that we have zero credibility with them by repeating poorly thought out arguments and stances they learn here.
If I can poke holes all in an Anon's stance on a subject, then that means normies can easily do the same. So I'm sort of a stress test for well meaning Anons to practice on, before heading out into the wild, and trying their points out on the normies we're supposed to be bringing over to our side.
I'm trying to get people to a) actually research what it is they're talking about, thus earning that title of elite research board that we've been given b) actually think about what it is they're talking about, not merely repeat stuff they hear, and c) actually learn how to make compelling arguments that will reach normies and have a better chance of getting them to come over to our side.
You don't think those are important quality control issues?