Plan A went sailing past when they stole the election in 2020 and then imported 30 million future democrat votes, intending to destroy the country with perpetual communist rule.
Fortunately, military operators never do things without contingency plans on top of contingency plans, in case the enemy also has plans.
IMHO at this point it feels like we're already up to Plan Q. ;p
😂😂😂. That’s good. I was a little wound up until Jan 20th 2021 when I saw the executive orders being signed in Culver Studios and not the White House. It didn’t take me long to realize that the DS/Cabal/etc. had just made themselves enemy combatants. Changing the rules. The Pause was part of plan A. There was a brief time of plan B, but I don’t think it was the Q team, just grass roots.
One thing that stuck with me was Flynn’s “Local action = National Impact”.
Is anything like that actually in the drops?
I’ve always taken “trust the plan” as “don’t do anything totally crazy, or react to the insanity, but also we have to take back our country” and have been trying to figure out how to help with the latter.
Mine either. It’s a call to basically be aware of civics and how to call the government to action and/or it and/or actors within it to accountability, and to be involved in its operation.
All of which are fairly involved, if someone wants to do them correctly, by my estimation.
So do I trust the original plan? Or do I trust all the variants of the original plan, when the original plan doesn't happen...as planned?
And what do I do when I trust what I believe the plan is, but it goes against what the majority of the people here is claiming what the plan is? Should I change my idea of what the plan is to match what the most popular opinion is, overall, at any given time? That will certainly save me a lot of 3 and 5 day bans for "dooming".
But if we go by track record alone, then most of the things I've gotten 3 and 5 day bans for was for "dooming" (aka disagreeing with someone) and time would eventually show that I was right, and the group consensus was wrong.
So what happens when lots of people who are very loud and post a lot (you know the ones I'm talking about, that act like they're part of the official Q press Corp and posts dozens of times every day) decide what The Plan is, but they've historically had really bad judgment on such things and are frequently wrong and you really think they're way off the mark? Is it OK to believe in The Plan if the Plan you believe in is completely different than what the Cool Kids Club here says the plan is?
And what happens when The Plan does a complete 180 on us? Is there an adjustment period where we're eased into what the Plan is currently, when it's the complete opposite of what we thought the plan was yesterday? Or is it just a "This is what we think now, if you still think the same as you did yesterday, you're against us!" type deal?
Because I'm currently in a couple, um, discussions where that seems to be the case.
But yeah, 100% believe in The Plan...as I understand it to be...today. Terms and Conditions may be subject to swift and repeated changes.
I've gotten 3 and 5 day bans for..."dooming" (aka disagreeing with someone)
Nothing personal anon but I bet you actually were banned for posting crap designed to erode, down to your own level of critical pessimism, the faith and trust of others in the Plan to Save the World, like this:
So what happens when lots of people who are very loud and post a lot (you know the ones I'm talking about, that act like they're part of the official Q press Corp and posts dozens of times every day) decide what The Plan is, but they've historically had really bad judgment
Is it OK to believe in The Plan if the Plan you believe in is completely different than what the Cool Kids Club here says the plan is?
And what happens when The Plan does a complete 180 on us?
With that negative attitude why are you even here among all us stupid happy morons, who are optimistic that Trump and his team might have a plan to counteract that of the satanic enemies of humankind? Do you think your holy mission is to come and save us from our own optimism?
To keep everyone on their toes, remind them of the "research" part of "elite research board" and to prevent this place from becoming an echo chamber where the loudest voices rule all opinion, no matter how idiotic they are, and to prevent well meaning Anons from absolutely tanking our reputation with normies (those people Q tasked us with bringing over to our side) so that we have zero credibility with them by repeating poorly thought out arguments and stances they learn here.
If I can poke holes all in an Anon's stance on a subject, then that means normies can easily do the same. So I'm sort of a stress test for well meaning Anons to practice on, before heading out into the wild, and trying their points out on the normies we're supposed to be bringing over to our side.
I'm trying to get people to a) actually research what it is they're talking about, thus earning that title of elite research board that we've been given b) actually think about what it is they're talking about, not merely repeat stuff they hear, and c) actually learn how to make compelling arguments that will reach normies and have a better chance of getting them to come over to our side.
You don't think those are important quality control issues?
I trust The Plan.
Recreational proctologists-🤣🤣🤣!
If it was not God's Plan, we wouldnt have come this far.
If this was not God's Plan, we would have already been enslaved by the Beast.
Yeah, at the time it felt weird to hear "two presidents" for example, and so many other things he said about Trump, but they all seem to be spot on.
I just wish they would release all the unedited complete sermons.
Plan A is going great. No need for plans B, C or D.
Plan A went sailing past when they stole the election in 2020 and then imported 30 million future democrat votes, intending to destroy the country with perpetual communist rule.
Fortunately, military operators never do things without contingency plans on top of contingency plans, in case the enemy also has plans.
IMHO at this point it feels like we're already up to Plan Q. ;p
😂😂😂. That’s good. I was a little wound up until Jan 20th 2021 when I saw the executive orders being signed in Culver Studios and not the White House. It didn’t take me long to realize that the DS/Cabal/etc. had just made themselves enemy combatants. Changing the rules. The Pause was part of plan A. There was a brief time of plan B, but I don’t think it was the Q team, just grass roots.
One thing that stuck with me was Flynn’s “Local action = National Impact”.
Is anything like that actually in the drops?
I’ve always taken “trust the plan” as “don’t do anything totally crazy, or react to the insanity, but also we have to take back our country” and have been trying to figure out how to help with the latter.
Mine either. It’s a call to basically be aware of civics and how to call the government to action and/or it and/or actors within it to accountability, and to be involved in its operation.
All of which are fairly involved, if someone wants to do them correctly, by my estimation.
“Action” need not be violent or physical.
There’s PANIC IN DC, although it’s no longer called DC, because the deep state players know the plan IS working. NCSWIC #
Kek. I was trusting the plan before trusting the plan was "cool".
So do I trust the original plan? Or do I trust all the variants of the original plan, when the original plan doesn't happen...as planned?
And what do I do when I trust what I believe the plan is, but it goes against what the majority of the people here is claiming what the plan is? Should I change my idea of what the plan is to match what the most popular opinion is, overall, at any given time? That will certainly save me a lot of 3 and 5 day bans for "dooming".
But if we go by track record alone, then most of the things I've gotten 3 and 5 day bans for was for "dooming" (aka disagreeing with someone) and time would eventually show that I was right, and the group consensus was wrong.
So what happens when lots of people who are very loud and post a lot (you know the ones I'm talking about, that act like they're part of the official Q press Corp and posts dozens of times every day) decide what The Plan is, but they've historically had really bad judgment on such things and are frequently wrong and you really think they're way off the mark? Is it OK to believe in The Plan if the Plan you believe in is completely different than what the Cool Kids Club here says the plan is?
And what happens when The Plan does a complete 180 on us? Is there an adjustment period where we're eased into what the Plan is currently, when it's the complete opposite of what we thought the plan was yesterday? Or is it just a "This is what we think now, if you still think the same as you did yesterday, you're against us!" type deal?
Because I'm currently in a couple, um, discussions where that seems to be the case.
But yeah, 100% believe in The Plan...as I understand it to be...today. Terms and Conditions may be subject to swift and repeated changes.
Nothing personal anon but I bet you actually were banned for posting crap designed to erode, down to your own level of critical pessimism, the faith and trust of others in the Plan to Save the World, like this:
With that negative attitude why are you even here among all us stupid happy morons, who are optimistic that Trump and his team might have a plan to counteract that of the satanic enemies of humankind? Do you think your holy mission is to come and save us from our own optimism?
Maybe consider banning yourself?
Qeq
To keep everyone on their toes, remind them of the "research" part of "elite research board" and to prevent this place from becoming an echo chamber where the loudest voices rule all opinion, no matter how idiotic they are, and to prevent well meaning Anons from absolutely tanking our reputation with normies (those people Q tasked us with bringing over to our side) so that we have zero credibility with them by repeating poorly thought out arguments and stances they learn here.
If I can poke holes all in an Anon's stance on a subject, then that means normies can easily do the same. So I'm sort of a stress test for well meaning Anons to practice on, before heading out into the wild, and trying their points out on the normies we're supposed to be bringing over to our side.
I'm trying to get people to a) actually research what it is they're talking about, thus earning that title of elite research board that we've been given b) actually think about what it is they're talking about, not merely repeat stuff they hear, and c) actually learn how to make compelling arguments that will reach normies and have a better chance of getting them to come over to our side.
You don't think those are important quality control issues?