"• Economist Richard Werner discusses the historical and structural ties between central banks and artificial warfare, emphasizing how central banks enable large-scale conflicts through money creation while centralizing power.
• Werner argues that modern central banking was designed to finance wars. The Bank of England, founded in 1694 as the first major central bank, was explicitly created (per its founding act) to raise and lend money to the government "in order to wage war."
• It was 100% privately owned, allowing bankers to lend newly created money to the state, leading to national debt and new taxes to service it."
And to this day the names of the original share holders of the 1694 Bank of England are still held in secrecy. Same thing with the original chartering of Hamilton's Bank of United States
That is interesting. There's a reason why all the founders of America hated the foreign banking cabal. They knew all of this already as they were extremely well read and understood what they didnt want controlling their country.
Technically it wasn't called a "Central Bank" at the time (thought it was a few years afterwards). However, it was still the creation of a fiat currency, created "fiat" (AKA by authority and without backing) by a bunch of "patriots," many of which were bankers, no few of them foreigners, some of them even English bankers, all of those bankers with direct, deep ties to the same group who created the original Central Bank in England.
All wars are created by Banks. All wars are Bankers wars. The primary beneficiaries of wars are bankers. The beliefs that the people who die for those wars is for the people themselves is provably false in every single case. If you look at just the actual facts, actual quotes in context, the actual actions in context, the actual effects after the fact, etc., and take out the rhetoric, the suppositions of beliefs, the statements of intentions in a world full of spies, you get a VERY different picture of who the beneficiaries are.
The victors write the history books. The Bankers own the history writers (and always have).
The fact that, "according to this video" the banks, "all" understand the big secret that is money creation. And how this is not something the commoners should know. Additionaly Allen Greenspan certainly knows about Richards work and about the big secret the banks wont reveil! To me this is nothing more than cartel level deception on a mega scale! And what's been shown so far is enough to warrant a deep investigation into all layers of banking to clean purge and re-vamp with new standards and methods and practices with the, as stated important factor of, "client money" being heavily guarded and protected in the final outcome.
"• Economist Richard Werner discusses the historical and structural ties between central banks and artificial warfare, emphasizing how central banks enable large-scale conflicts through money creation while centralizing power.
• Werner argues that modern central banking was designed to finance wars. The Bank of England, founded in 1694 as the first major central bank, was explicitly created (per its founding act) to raise and lend money to the government "in order to wage war."
• It was 100% privately owned, allowing bankers to lend newly created money to the state, leading to national debt and new taxes to service it."
https://rumble.com/v6wultk-the-first-central-bank-was-created-to-raise-money-to-wage-war.html
Those who plan and wage war make cash beyond avarice — but not the guys who risk death in the battlefields.
And to this day the names of the original share holders of the 1694 Bank of England are still held in secrecy. Same thing with the original chartering of Hamilton's Bank of United States
Check out the Bill Still documentary from the 90's the money masters: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFj_cqNBaZY
Disgusting!
That is interesting. There's a reason why all the founders of America hated the foreign banking cabal. They knew all of this already as they were extremely well read and understood what they didnt want controlling their country.
How do you think the Revolutionary War was paid for?
Technically it wasn't called a "Central Bank" at the time (thought it was a few years afterwards). However, it was still the creation of a fiat currency, created "fiat" (AKA by authority and without backing) by a bunch of "patriots," many of which were bankers, no few of them foreigners, some of them even English bankers, all of those bankers with direct, deep ties to the same group who created the original Central Bank in England.
All wars are created by Banks. All wars are Bankers wars. The primary beneficiaries of wars are bankers. The beliefs that the people who die for those wars is for the people themselves is provably false in every single case. If you look at just the actual facts, actual quotes in context, the actual actions in context, the actual effects after the fact, etc., and take out the rhetoric, the suppositions of beliefs, the statements of intentions in a world full of spies, you get a VERY different picture of who the beneficiaries are.
The victors write the history books. The Bankers own the history writers (and always have).
The fact that, "according to this video" the banks, "all" understand the big secret that is money creation. And how this is not something the commoners should know. Additionaly Allen Greenspan certainly knows about Richards work and about the big secret the banks wont reveil! To me this is nothing more than cartel level deception on a mega scale! And what's been shown so far is enough to warrant a deep investigation into all layers of banking to clean purge and re-vamp with new standards and methods and practices with the, as stated important factor of, "client money" being heavily guarded and protected in the final outcome.