Erm, they decided not to vote. They are legally obligated to be present for the vote (otherwise arrest warrants could not have been issued).
At what point does breaking the law (i.e. not presenting for a quorum vote) make it so that one's right to vote as a lawmaker are reneged? As in: failed as a represntative, and fired. When one obstinately excapes the state, to avoid voting? This now emerges to be the case.
The fact that they are moving their carcasses around, indicates they are alive. Which means they could have fulfilled their duty. So they are clearly shirking.
Hardly going to fly that the vote 'shouldn't have been held'. Clearly, it should have. Redistricting is part and parcel of what happens every cycle. When one 'runs' to be a 'representative of the people' one must understand that this job comes with obligations, not just 'rights'.
Erm, they decided not to vote. They are legally obligated to be present for the vote (otherwise arrest warrants could not have been issued).
At what point does breaking the law (i.e. not presenting for a quorum vote) make it so that one's right to vote as a lawmaker are reneged? As in: failed as a represntative, and fired. When one obstinately excapes the state, to avoid voting? This now emerges to be the case.
The fact that they are moving their carcasses around, indicates they are alive. Which means they could have fulfilled their duty. So they are clearly shirking.
Hardly going to fly that the vote 'shouldn't have been held'. Clearly, it should have. Redistricting is part and parcel of what happens every cycle. When one 'runs' to be a 'representative of the people' one must understand that this job comes with obligations, not just 'rights'.
Rofl...hilarious. Can't wait for that ruling:
Thanks
See the clerk...