It also avoids the uncomfortable conversations about who is setting the fires, and why they’re doing so.
Though I’m surprised they decided to go with an outright ban. Local and State Governments in the U.S are more creative with how they dance around and avoid talking about verboten topics.
Isn’t this admitting that forest fires are started by people, not climate change?
The Law says, "No hunting or fishing in the King's forest."
Indirectly.
It also avoids the uncomfortable conversations about who is setting the fires, and why they’re doing so.
Though I’m surprised they decided to go with an outright ban. Local and State Governments in the U.S are more creative with how they dance around and avoid talking about verboten topics.