It just occurred to me that the point of investigation is to find information that could lead to a crimiinal charge, arrest, and/or conviction.
But Q has repeatedly said: "We have it all."
So what's the point of announcing an "investigation" if we have it all--by definition, having everything we need?
I know optics plays a role, yes. But blogs like The Conservative Treehouse (Sundance) have taught me to actively distrust "investigations" because they are designed to go nowhere are are only meant to placate the public until the outrage blows over, at which point Washington resumes normal corrupt business. "Chaff and countermeasures," as he likes to say.
I apologize if this sounds distrustful, but I have a curiosity itch that needs scratching.
It has to look normal to the normies. Plus, there needs to be bite size pieces Leading up to the big reveal. Expect some more of: just happened to find.
Most accurate. This is the "public investigation" being run through the civil/criminal courts. There is a second "private investigation" run by military intel to run through the military tribunal (if needed). If civil/criminal courts blocked or corrupted, they try to expose/fix with military/SCOTUS oversight.
If unsuccessful, then military tribunal moves forward. Some cases are preselected for military tribunal for particularly evil acts or complicated cases of treason. Two likely examples: Bill Richardson (NM crimes) and Walter Mondale (treason as Soviet agent via MI-6), both likely executed for their crimes.