The necessary and proper clause is often abused to arrive at a conclusion that is favorable to the imperialists.
Chat-4.o went even so far as to create an implied power theory based on this and the supremacy clause
I countered it with 2 considerations:
that the States create the Federal, so the Federal is the Child, and the Child has only Expressed power, whereas the parent (viz amendment 10) reserves all rights, including to abolish the Federal government, federal law cannot supersede these rights reserved, as there is no power in the child to do so. It is null and void.
The supreme law of the land can only be a consequence to the status of a law, if this law is pursuant of the expressed power within the constitution given to the Federal Government.
If the argument is that the states never left, despite their due process secession, then they could not have been put under military occupation, as the people of those states were denied constitutional representation, and there could not be any law that would prohibit the eligible people in such states, based on their own rules, from participating in the reconstitution of their government based on a state constitution that encompasses the Constitution of 1793 itself AND the 13 amendments as originally written.
Since, the current 13th, 14th amendment were not then (1865-1868) put into force, the only fall back to include all living souls is the declaration of Independence, and the subsequent discussion on what to do with the not yet emancipated slaves and their children. Since this issue was not the official reason to wage the war against Southern secession, it follows that
The Union should have accepted the secession because there were irreconcilable differences that have later served that the wedge of the coercion: in order to end the military dictatorship by the USA in those CSA states
Admit that it is all been illegal, and things have to be put to the people as to what they want.
But, in order to do so, you have to clean up the voter roles .....
Observation:
I find it highly suspicious that the first 13 (as originally written) caused severe civil discussion and debate, but, passed with flying colors. The new 13th and the later additions, like the 16th and 17th, etc, are all badly written, abusive, and the odor of illegality is glued to it.
A second observation: Turning back the clock on what is often seen as progressive, without being a betterment, requires timing.
Freeing of slaves is sequentially the 14th since the original 13th stripping foreign agents of citizenship was re-ratified (and published as LAW) by Indiana as 18 of 24 on January 30th, 1824. It is active and allows all lawyers in the US who are members of their state bars (subs of foreign AMA in DC) to be stripped of citizenship and then deported.
If Trump "nationalizes" DC, then the foreign occupation of states ends, but the MSC contracts must be terminated by Governors to restore state sovereignty and free them from Federal control completely. Given that Trump is using Fed control against Blue states to deny funding right now, he will likely delay this maneuver for some time.
The necessary and proper clause is often abused to arrive at a conclusion that is favorable to the imperialists.
Chat-4.o went even so far as to create an implied power theory based on this and the supremacy clause
I countered it with 2 considerations:
The supreme law of the land can only be a consequence to the status of a law, if this law is pursuant of the expressed power within the constitution given to the Federal Government.
Since, the current 13th, 14th amendment were not then (1865-1868) put into force, the only fall back to include all living souls is the declaration of Independence, and the subsequent discussion on what to do with the not yet emancipated slaves and their children. Since this issue was not the official reason to wage the war against Southern secession, it follows that
But, in order to do so, you have to clean up the voter roles .....
Observation:
I find it highly suspicious that the first 13 (as originally written) caused severe civil discussion and debate, but, passed with flying colors. The new 13th and the later additions, like the 16th and 17th, etc, are all badly written, abusive, and the odor of illegality is glued to it.
A second observation: Turning back the clock on what is often seen as progressive, without being a betterment, requires timing.
Freeing of slaves is sequentially the 14th since the original 13th stripping foreign agents of citizenship was re-ratified (and published as LAW) by Indiana as 18 of 24 on January 30th, 1824. It is active and allows all lawyers in the US who are members of their state bars (subs of foreign AMA in DC) to be stripped of citizenship and then deported.
If Trump "nationalizes" DC, then the foreign occupation of states ends, but the MSC contracts must be terminated by Governors to restore state sovereignty and free them from Federal control completely. Given that Trump is using Fed control against Blue states to deny funding right now, he will likely delay this maneuver for some time.