“Anarchism” can look great to lawful people, till you realize it’s not “laws” you have an issue with, but “statutes”, which in our system of government are supposed to be unlawful. (The left/right paradigm exists in that philosophy too, which is hilarious)
I’m curious how hard real freedom is. If people will self-deport from this country once we’ve accomplished what’s intended, is it going to be to avoid punishment, or because freedom actually requires a good bit of work?
They’re too lazy to work for anything. A certain group will yell reparation and demand entitlement. Another group wants to colonize with their head covers, sandals, and yelling lalallahllah. Another group would bend over and drop soaps for money. Without the entire society with every single human being perfect and docile and with the purest hearts, anarchism would never work. Bartering and hard work for the joy of it, no greed and all holy, fair, and just, without people with mental problems and without psychopaths and narcissists would be the only way it’d work.
Yeah, it definitely wouldn’t work. What I meant was that we wouldn’t have ever had anyone calling themselves “anarchocapitalist” if it hadn’t been for all the unlawful statutes and mandates and such getting misunderstood as being lawful.
How could things like speed limits work in the absence of statues, anyway? Do those stick around if we do away with all the civic law, or does civic law not go away entirely?
"Anarchocapitalism" is a triumph of idealism over realism. If it were ever attempted in practice, the ruling force in society would be the Mafia. There is no way to enforce anarchism on an "archist." (I knew Murray Rothbard and his crowd.)
As they should. We can exile them all to a deserted island or to the Amazon jungle since they love lawlessness so much.
“Anarchism” can look great to lawful people, till you realize it’s not “laws” you have an issue with, but “statutes”, which in our system of government are supposed to be unlawful. (The left/right paradigm exists in that philosophy too, which is hilarious)
I’m curious how hard real freedom is. If people will self-deport from this country once we’ve accomplished what’s intended, is it going to be to avoid punishment, or because freedom actually requires a good bit of work?
They’re too lazy to work for anything. A certain group will yell reparation and demand entitlement. Another group wants to colonize with their head covers, sandals, and yelling lalallahllah. Another group would bend over and drop soaps for money. Without the entire society with every single human being perfect and docile and with the purest hearts, anarchism would never work. Bartering and hard work for the joy of it, no greed and all holy, fair, and just, without people with mental problems and without psychopaths and narcissists would be the only way it’d work.
Yeah, it definitely wouldn’t work. What I meant was that we wouldn’t have ever had anyone calling themselves “anarchocapitalist” if it hadn’t been for all the unlawful statutes and mandates and such getting misunderstood as being lawful.
How could things like speed limits work in the absence of statues, anyway? Do those stick around if we do away with all the civic law, or does civic law not go away entirely?
"Anarchocapitalism" is a triumph of idealism over realism. If it were ever attempted in practice, the ruling force in society would be the Mafia. There is no way to enforce anarchism on an "archist." (I knew Murray Rothbard and his crowd.)