When I was a child I swore allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic, for which it stands.
I didn't really have a choice in the matter. All children at the time were forced to take an oath to be subservient to the Republic, AKA the people who ran the US Government.
How'd that work out for me? Not nearly as well as it appeared on the brochure.
You say now, "swear allegiance to the Constitution." Presumably that takes care of any of the fuckery. It most certainly does not. That is Controlled Opposition talking. The problems with the Republic of today, and all of it's laws, are perfectly consistent, even encouraged within the original Constitution. So to you I say, fuck you, and fuck Paul Revere's horse he didn't actually run in on. No one gets my oath of fealty. No one is my master other than myself.
You want to take care of the problems of ideologies? Learn the problems with the ones that you believe in first. Learn the real history, and all the required context that proves that all of those ideologies were created by the same entity to control the populace through Controlled Opposition. When enough people learn how the world actually works (through propaganda controlled by controlled opposition), I suggest the problem of ideologies takes care of itself.
I suggest the desire to couple a belief system with the truth (the actual Truth) is a part of the journey; the human condition. Only those who hold on to the ability to internally ask questions on all topics, true skeptics, are capable of decoupling that desire sufficiently to keep asking questions, no matter the apparent evidence or experience.
I suggest every single person has been strictly guided on all of their ideologies. For example, unless you are the originator of an ideology, it has been created for you. Ditto our mythologies. As far as I can find, every single ideology and every single mythology that has any influence today have all been created by the same entity, carefully cultivated and pushed through their propaganda systems (usually including "propaganda of the deed"). If people learn that all of those mainstream ideologies from the left and the right are all created by that same entity, that will likely (hopefully) create a lot more true skeptics. At the least, it will likely create a larger pool of "sides" of reasoned debate than the current. It will also prove to be less fraught with anger and violence in our debates, because all of our extreme views are also created by that same entity through the same method through their propaganda systems.
Curious that you refer to an "entity," but give it no name. Plenty of ideologies and mythologies that have nothing to do with reality, which is not a sign of skepticism but of psychosis. You also confuse skepticism and curiosity as a motive for questions. No room in this description for beliefs derived from reality, instead of an independent belief system that must be "coupled" with reality.
Curious that you refer to an "entity," but give it no name.
Telling people the name is irrelevant. You can't tell people, you must show them. If you are really interested you should read my report. It isn't about telling anyone anything. It is about showing the evidence. It itself is not complete unfortunately. There are five more sections intended. They are mostly written, but these things take time, especially since my life has been rather difficult of late.
Nevertheless, what is there will give sufficient evidence of a group of people at the top of society ruling from the shadows by the methods I suggest that it at least gives an appreciation of my claims.
Plenty of ideologies and mythologies that have nothing to do with reality
I suggest ALL ideologies and mythologies are wrong. Indeed, my investigation suggests that all such things are intentionally wrong (though my investigation suggests they all use interesting elements of the truth to create their falsehoods). They do create a certain psychosis as you suggest, but the reasons are not obvious.
No room in this description for beliefs derived from reality
I'm not trying to tell you what the truth is. I don't know myself. I suggest neither do you. All I can do is show the evidence of what I've found. That evidence suggests the statements I am making. To see the beginnings of that evidence chain, I suggest you read my report.
To be fair it takes time to read. It is a body of evidence, and, as it was intentionally constructed, that body requires ALL of the evidence, in sequence, to make sense. Thus you have to begin in the beginning and read all the middle to make it to the end for the case to be debated reasonably. In addition, as stated, it's less than half way done (maybe a quarter or less). Even so, what is there is more than enough to create a solid body of evidence to the claims.
When I was a child I swore allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic, for which it stands.
I didn't really have a choice in the matter. All children at the time were forced to take an oath to be subservient to the Republic, AKA the people who ran the US Government.
How'd that work out for me? Not nearly as well as it appeared on the brochure.
You say now, "swear allegiance to the Constitution." Presumably that takes care of any of the fuckery. It most certainly does not. That is Controlled Opposition talking. The problems with the Republic of today, and all of it's laws, are perfectly consistent, even encouraged within the original Constitution. So to you I say, fuck you, and fuck Paul Revere's horse he didn't actually run in on. No one gets my oath of fealty. No one is my master other than myself.
You want to take care of the problems of ideologies? Learn the problems with the ones that you believe in first. Learn the real history, and all the required context that proves that all of those ideologies were created by the same entity to control the populace through Controlled Opposition. When enough people learn how the world actually works (through propaganda controlled by controlled opposition), I suggest the problem of ideologies takes care of itself.
And replaced by the problem of mythologies.
I suggest the desire to couple a belief system with the truth (the actual Truth) is a part of the journey; the human condition. Only those who hold on to the ability to internally ask questions on all topics, true skeptics, are capable of decoupling that desire sufficiently to keep asking questions, no matter the apparent evidence or experience.
I suggest every single person has been strictly guided on all of their ideologies. For example, unless you are the originator of an ideology, it has been created for you. Ditto our mythologies. As far as I can find, every single ideology and every single mythology that has any influence today have all been created by the same entity, carefully cultivated and pushed through their propaganda systems (usually including "propaganda of the deed"). If people learn that all of those mainstream ideologies from the left and the right are all created by that same entity, that will likely (hopefully) create a lot more true skeptics. At the least, it will likely create a larger pool of "sides" of reasoned debate than the current. It will also prove to be less fraught with anger and violence in our debates, because all of our extreme views are also created by that same entity through the same method through their propaganda systems.
Curious that you refer to an "entity," but give it no name. Plenty of ideologies and mythologies that have nothing to do with reality, which is not a sign of skepticism but of psychosis. You also confuse skepticism and curiosity as a motive for questions. No room in this description for beliefs derived from reality, instead of an independent belief system that must be "coupled" with reality.
Telling people the name is irrelevant. You can't tell people, you must show them. If you are really interested you should read my report. It isn't about telling anyone anything. It is about showing the evidence. It itself is not complete unfortunately. There are five more sections intended. They are mostly written, but these things take time, especially since my life has been rather difficult of late.
Nevertheless, what is there will give sufficient evidence of a group of people at the top of society ruling from the shadows by the methods I suggest that it at least gives an appreciation of my claims.
I suggest ALL ideologies and mythologies are wrong. Indeed, my investigation suggests that all such things are intentionally wrong (though my investigation suggests they all use interesting elements of the truth to create their falsehoods). They do create a certain psychosis as you suggest, but the reasons are not obvious.
I'm not trying to tell you what the truth is. I don't know myself. I suggest neither do you. All I can do is show the evidence of what I've found. That evidence suggests the statements I am making. To see the beginnings of that evidence chain, I suggest you read my report.
To be fair it takes time to read. It is a body of evidence, and, as it was intentionally constructed, that body requires ALL of the evidence, in sequence, to make sense. Thus you have to begin in the beginning and read all the middle to make it to the end for the case to be debated reasonably. In addition, as stated, it's less than half way done (maybe a quarter or less). Even so, what is there is more than enough to create a solid body of evidence to the claims.