This is what liberal/communism (MSM) has done since obama. Make Unprovable claims/lies with zero Proof. The 1st Amendment can NOT be used for criminal Lies that destroy the US. Constitution.
If there are "settlements" and no prosecutions or charges, wouldn't the details be private with a "payment forfeiture clause" if details revealed as is typical? You don't "settle" to prevent embarrassing details from becoming public, and then just let embarrassing details become public. Retards.
Interesting that none of the accusations except for the first one is even tied to Trump directly, only to his properties. Trump is not the only one who lived in Trump Tower and he's not the only one who uses Mar-a-largo.
It is interesting to see what the enemy is doing. This one doesn't even look professionally done. CIA would fabricate intricate details for EACH so-called accuser over a period of time and let them run a bit, rather than providing a summary of 6 as the "lead". And why 6 exactly? All 1990s era, but one in 2012 thrown in for good measure? Bizarre.
This is what liberal/communism (MSM) has done since obama. Make Unprovable claims/lies with zero Proof. The 1st Amendment can NOT be used for criminal Lies that destroy the US. Constitution.
If there are "settlements" and no prosecutions or charges, wouldn't the details be private with a "payment forfeiture clause" if details revealed as is typical? You don't "settle" to prevent embarrassing details from becoming public, and then just let embarrassing details become public. Retards.
Since when are minors names not redacted? Aren't they known as Jon or Jane Doe?
Interesting that none of the accusations except for the first one is even tied to Trump directly, only to his properties. Trump is not the only one who lived in Trump Tower and he's not the only one who uses Mar-a-largo.
And you shouldn't be giving this legs by posting this libellous BS here either!
It is interesting to see what the enemy is doing. This one doesn't even look professionally done. CIA would fabricate intricate details for EACH so-called accuser over a period of time and let them run a bit, rather than providing a summary of 6 as the "lead". And why 6 exactly? All 1990s era, but one in 2012 thrown in for good measure? Bizarre.
We all know it's BS because if it were true the Democrats would have been all over it preventing him from running in 2016. And they didn't.
Nor in 2020 nor in 2024 and you are right THEY WOULD HAVE!
Which is it? Libel or slander?