That's a good question mmtwo.
I don't think it has to do with "aliens" simply because, while this object is relatively 'fast,' it is painfully (impractically) SLOW as a means of practical space travel.
I've been following info on it for 2 or 3 weeks. And i remember a couple times that it "slow downed and sped up". Maybe that could be explained with some gravitational push/pull. But its interesting for sure.
Could be plausible deniability in Q's answer. I don't believe that Q's answer really confirms actual Aliens from outer space (as in little green men that evolved on another planet, not human-animal Chimeras made by mad scientists.)
Are we alone?
No
So, this answer to the first question could still be correct in a biblical worldview, which believes in angels and demons.
Roswell ?
Highest classification.
This answer could just be a single line referring that Roswell is simply classified, but is not giving any information as to what actually happened.
Consider the vastness of space.
Another throw away line that is meaningless if taken by itself.
To me it reads as it's wrote. Q.- Are we alone ? Roswell ? A.- No.
Highest classification.Consider the vastness of space. But i'm just one lil froggy.I guess I could be wrong.
Speaking a a long-time worker in classified activities, I would ask how Q could know that anything was in the "highest classification" unless he was read into that activity---and had broad knowledge of all the lesser classified programs? Not credible to have such broad knowledge. "High" is a misleading adjective, since the degree of secrecy is determined by the limitation of access (need to know), not by any hierarchy. He could know this only by being briefed into the activity. And if he had been, he would be up for charges for even talking about it. So, Q is only making a surmise.
And the "vastness of space" reference is an invitation for the reader to fill in the blank. It communicates nothing, and could equally be a prompt to reflect on the formidable distances involved and the near impossibility of physical transport between the stars. But he leads you along to think what you want to think, in the belief that he is affirming it. Simple as a hoax card trick.
Hey Bibloop!
I have already written the post (spent weeks on it) but have NOT posted it yet.
I will be posting it October 23rd.
John could there be a connection to u/#q2222
That's a good question mmtwo.
I don't think it has to do with "aliens" simply because, while this object is relatively 'fast,' it is painfully (impractically) SLOW as a means of practical space travel.
I've been following info on it for 2 or 3 weeks. And i remember a couple times that it "slow downed and sped up". Maybe that could be explained with some gravitational push/pull. But its interesting for sure.
Yeah that's definitely interesting. Exciting times!
Could be plausible deniability in Q's answer. I don't believe that Q's answer really confirms actual Aliens from outer space (as in little green men that evolved on another planet, not human-animal Chimeras made by mad scientists.)
So, this answer to the first question could still be correct in a biblical worldview, which believes in angels and demons.
This answer could just be a single line referring that Roswell is simply classified, but is not giving any information as to what actually happened.
Another throw away line that is meaningless if taken by itself.
To me it reads as it's wrote. Q.- Are we alone ? Roswell ? A.- No. Highest classification.Consider the vastness of space. But i'm just one lil froggy.I guess I could be wrong.
Speaking a a long-time worker in classified activities, I would ask how Q could know that anything was in the "highest classification" unless he was read into that activity---and had broad knowledge of all the lesser classified programs? Not credible to have such broad knowledge. "High" is a misleading adjective, since the degree of secrecy is determined by the limitation of access (need to know), not by any hierarchy. He could know this only by being briefed into the activity. And if he had been, he would be up for charges for even talking about it. So, Q is only making a surmise.
And the "vastness of space" reference is an invitation for the reader to fill in the blank. It communicates nothing, and could equally be a prompt to reflect on the formidable distances involved and the near impossibility of physical transport between the stars. But he leads you along to think what you want to think, in the belief that he is affirming it. Simple as a hoax card trick.