BREAKING: The Trump DOJ just released the transcripts and audio of their interview with Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell. GET. THE FVCK. IN HERE!!!!
(unusualwhales.com)
🧐 ELITE Researchers 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (70)
sorted by:
She also chose to shield the Clintons just as strongly. “He never. Absolutely never went. And I can be sure of that because there’s no way he would’ve gone – I don’t believe there’s any way that he would’ve gone to the island, had I not been there. Because I don’t believe he had an independent friendship, if you will, with Epstein...He was a rich guy with a plane." She specifically said Hillary had no dealings with Epstein either.
This interview basically just shattered the list narrative. We can't just pick and choose the parts we want to hear.
Yea, this just destroys any sort of reliability of her testimony. Shielding the Clintons is retarded. She shouldn't have said anything about them if this was the case.
This is unreliable testimony. Means nothing now.
Or she wants to live....
If that's the reason then we can't trust anything she's saying anyway and this interview gives us nothing. That was always the risk, that we give her credibility and it backfires when she lies. Regardless, we now have new official testimony on record that states that Trump and the Clintons are innocent. If the DOJ wants to pursue, it's another hurdle they have to jump over for either party. They would have to discredit her first
If the past few years have taught us anything it is that the Left convinces itself of a story then holds itself to that party line...
If the inter viewers did not press the right points or ask the right questions then she may very well have flossed over the legitimate deals bit..
If you (the interviewer) don't comprehend that $5million is play money to many of these people then you will never understand friend pricing...
I wonder if she is being told to use the playbook we use; shield trump so that dems/naysayers can say, “see! He’s complicit, he’s a part of it, why is she protecting him?”
I've always thought this was an unnecessary "hail mary" if they already had enough info about who was guilty. She has perjured herself multiple times and is an obvious manipulator, and we're giving her credibility? Seems obvious that this is what she was going to try to do, say she's innocent and that no one powerful is implicated.
It would be the same thing with releasing the court records, where there were only 2 victim testimonies anyway - better than nothing (and they still should) but that was never going to be a bombshell either or implicate anyone big like the Clintons (who she exonerated anyway, so I doubt the case even implicated them) or some massive network.
Either Trump is telling the truth and we really don't have any kind of list or definitive proof right now, or someone inside the admin is really trying to spike this thing.
That’s how you know the entire thing is bullshit
Of course she said Clintons weren't an issue. She knows like the rest of us how many got arkancided.
Yeah I was always against them giving her a platform to begin with because I knew she would absolve everyone of wrongdoing and paint herself as completely innocent. They shouldn't have announced they were gonna interview her if it was just gonna lead to this nonsense. Now the Clintons and Trump have the same alibi. Yuck, feels so dirty.