I briefly thought that "And, by what means would be know that any of it ended up "abroad" when they could simply show it to an Israeli agent in London" part through when making the statement.
Astronomers infer an invisible cosmic object's existence by observing its gravitational effects on nearby visible objects.
Like astronomers detecting invisible objects by their effects, an intelligence leak can be identified by unusual political reactions, such as sudden defensiveness, policy shifts, or coordinated efforts to mitigate or exploit the leaked information.
A very seductive analogy, but completely worthless. In astronomy, you have measurements of physical quantities, and a fairly rigorous theory from which to draw conclusions. In the realm of fuzzy information, all you have is guesswork, which is always contaminated by bias and incomplete information. For one thing, you don't ever know whether the reacting party had obtained the information from a completely different source. And then you have the problem of "mirror-imaging", thinking the other party has the same set of priorities and imperatives that you do, and infer from that. That has been a classic and long-standing impairment in our understanding of Soviet Union / Russia. In many ways, they don't think like us and we draw the wrong conclusions by imagining they do.
"In astronomy, you have measurements of physical quantities, and a fairly rigorous theory from which to draw conclusions." Now that's funny there fren!
You mean like the "Dark Matter" theory pushed as fact that is turning out to be 100% myth?
Astronomy is as corrupted by big money interest as much as any other field of so call science.
First, you use the theory of gravity and planetary motions as an analogy to your argument. Then when I point out that the theory depends on an exactitude that cannot be expected from human affairs, you pull out a scientific hypothesis (speculation) that really has no theory, and trash astronomy as a whole. I hope you don't settle family disagreements this way.
I briefly thought that "And, by what means would be know that any of it ended up "abroad" when they could simply show it to an Israeli agent in London" part through when making the statement.
Astronomers infer an invisible cosmic object's existence by observing its gravitational effects on nearby visible objects.
Like astronomers detecting invisible objects by their effects, an intelligence leak can be identified by unusual political reactions, such as sudden defensiveness, policy shifts, or coordinated efforts to mitigate or exploit the leaked information.
A very seductive analogy, but completely worthless. In astronomy, you have measurements of physical quantities, and a fairly rigorous theory from which to draw conclusions. In the realm of fuzzy information, all you have is guesswork, which is always contaminated by bias and incomplete information. For one thing, you don't ever know whether the reacting party had obtained the information from a completely different source. And then you have the problem of "mirror-imaging", thinking the other party has the same set of priorities and imperatives that you do, and infer from that. That has been a classic and long-standing impairment in our understanding of Soviet Union / Russia. In many ways, they don't think like us and we draw the wrong conclusions by imagining they do.
"In astronomy, you have measurements of physical quantities, and a fairly rigorous theory from which to draw conclusions." Now that's funny there fren!
You mean like the "Dark Matter" theory pushed as fact that is turning out to be 100% myth?
Astronomy is as corrupted by big money interest as much as any other field of so call science.
First, you use the theory of gravity and planetary motions as an analogy to your argument. Then when I point out that the theory depends on an exactitude that cannot be expected from human affairs, you pull out a scientific hypothesis (speculation) that really has no theory, and trash astronomy as a whole. I hope you don't settle family disagreements this way.
At least I did not inject person insults into out discussion thread.
Shame on you.