Launch SCRUBBED for today
Links to livestreams:
Nasaspaceflight featuring Scott Manley
https://youtube.com/watch?v=C7WmlTp7ue0
Everyday Astronaut
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Xv97hecvwfI
Some relevant Q drops: u/#q209
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Skynet 🤔SpaceX 🤔Star Link 🤔ID: 66o6MRSe 😮
I believe that a significant portion of the Golden Dome is already in place due to Space X. Also, because of Starlink, an internet exists that is not subject to the Deep State choke points.
A bonus. The X-37B is now capable of going up on a Space X rocket. One of my toys. A shout out to a couple of Los Alamos scientists who flushed out the data and presented it to the AF Scientific Advisory Board. I told the head that it was the only idea worth pursuing of all the presentations.
💯
The most intriguing drop is the first:
u/#q209
Is X a subsidiary of SpaceX? With all the talk of space force being cyberspace, it makes sense. Not to mention Q#428 grouping it together with Amazon Echo, Google Home and the facial recognition from FB & Apple. u/#q428
No - but both companies are privately held and majority owned by Musk. So, kind of.
Yes grouping it, but I get more of the feeling that the "Bombs Away" reference is to SpaceX (Starlink/Starshield/Starship) dropping the bombs on deep state assets. Just a guess - we shall see.
Not sure why anyone believes ANYTHING coming out of the production studio known as NASA.
Maybe because Trump put Sean Duffy in charge of it now (as of July 9, 2025). As in Secretary of Transportation Duffy.
https://www.nasa.gov/people/sean-duffy/
None of the links here are to NASA. Youtube/@Nasaspaceflight is not actually affiliated in any way with NASA, just uses it in their name (for some reason).
The NASA space flight stream is a perfect example of "you are the news now"
Not a single MSM outlet that I could find is even running a story about the launch. They will report tomorrow "big rocket fails mission"
REMINDER : No Moon Journey Nor "Starship" can traverse the moon without refueling while in orbit of earth. Read it again. For the moon at least 18 rockets have to "meet " with the orbiting 'ship' that wishes to go to the moon. Then when a ' Star ship " needs to go beyond the moon, it needs additional 'refueling'. Musk admits this, despite the Ten failures of 'Starship ' so far.
Then we have the Van Allen Belt and we have the fact that " Thrust or Rocket Pulse from 'fuel' " does not work in a vacuum or SPACE VACUUM.
SO, we are being Jerked around here. No other explenation, except . . creative writing and LIES. LIES are common with NASA.
Starship weighs 120 tons empty, so yeah, getting Starship to the moon would require just as much enegery (delta-v) as getting the space shuttle to the moon. Read this thread: https://greatawakening.win/p/19BtGb0V0j/elon-musk-proves-the-apollo-11-m/ (some other space nerds sum up the math nicely for those who dont understand).
For the van Allen belts, mehhhhh, Polaris Dawn flew through them last year and the crew said they got a dose similar to being on ISS for a month, and astros routinely spend months or even years on orbit. So not really a big deal.
Rockets definitely work in a vacuum and they're one of the only proplusion and control mechanisms that do - you're thinking of paddles, rudders, jet engines, propellers, rotors, and wings - none of those work in a vacuum.
I wouldn't say that starship's nine integrated test flights to date have been failures. They caught the booster from mid air, and not just once. Every flight they learned something since the last one. This is basically a Saturn 5 class super heavy lift vehicle but fully reusable. Let that sink in for a moment. Saturn 5 class super heavy lift, but without expending a single part.
Fuel has no business in a vacuum. Its been 100 years, its a 'show' for the masses to raise money, to deceive for $$$.
In, this next segment I am not talking to you , so do not be offended.
Please don't lie to me. You have extra special military tech, not being used to kill or threat to kill because its supposedly so bad ass. Your an entity that defies what our children should be taught about, AND your the reason we are watching you and will not let you into space, the cosmos, because your intent is not pure.
STOP NOW, and take care of your own. You have failed the first rule of space exploration.
============
We have a whole program in the tens of trillions that spans 50 years of reaching out to space.
Space said, " take care of your own first " .
We did not listen.
We continued to and accelerated the despise and destruction of our own.
Space told us, NO.
Space said thats enough.
We are coming for you, YOU are a DANGER to the Cosmos.
Thats The Fact , Thats REALITY , WAKE UP !
If it takes 18 rockets to get a Starship to the moon, but the total cost to orbit is only 1% of what it costs for Orion/SLS, isn't that a win? I'm not sure I get the argument.