No need to ban islam if you don’t allow muslims into the country. Since the European countries already screwed that up, they need to deport any non-Europeans and that will take care of most of their muslim problems. If European people want to be or become muslim, that’s their business but if they choose to stay in Europe they should expect to be a tiny minority with no public calls to prayer to allah, no identification exceptions for face coverings, no public assistance for multiple wives, no leniency on crime especially against non-muslim native Europeans, no no-go zones, no consideration for sharia diarrhea, etc
Freedom of religion isn’t some secular value from the age of the enlightenment. It’s from Christianity. In John 14:6, Jesus said
No one comes to the Father except through me.”
“Comes” is an active verb, meaning that people choose to do it or not. This, combined with Christianity’s command to love one another and not persecute, is why Christian peaceful evangelism is morally superior to islam’s submit-or-die accretion method.
We can allow freedom of religion for muslims, but it doesn’t need to take place in our nations. There is no mention in the Bible of “racism” or “islamaphobia” being a sin. In a couple places, racism is implied to be a virtue. The relation between race and islam is that islam is so dumb that it’s more likely to be adopted by people from dumb races.
THIS is why Islam MUST be outlawed in ALL "free" countries.
Yeah, no country where islam has a certain amount of political influence, can be considered free.
Islam is Demonic.
No need to ban islam if you don’t allow muslims into the country. Since the European countries already screwed that up, they need to deport any non-Europeans and that will take care of most of their muslim problems. If European people want to be or become muslim, that’s their business but if they choose to stay in Europe they should expect to be a tiny minority with no public calls to prayer to allah, no identification exceptions for face coverings, no public assistance for multiple wives, no leniency on crime especially against non-muslim native Europeans, no no-go zones, no consideration for sharia diarrhea, etc
Can we allow the religious freedom to not allow religious freedom?
They can have a religious belief that isn’t violent. We have removed other cults that have demonstrated a threat.
Freedom of religion isn’t some secular value from the age of the enlightenment. It’s from Christianity. In John 14:6, Jesus said
“Comes” is an active verb, meaning that people choose to do it or not. This, combined with Christianity’s command to love one another and not persecute, is why Christian peaceful evangelism is morally superior to islam’s submit-or-die accretion method.
We can allow freedom of religion for muslims, but it doesn’t need to take place in our nations. There is no mention in the Bible of “racism” or “islamaphobia” being a sin. In a couple places, racism is implied to be a virtue. The relation between race and islam is that islam is so dumb that it’s more likely to be adopted by people from dumb races.
...be a lot simpler (and more effective) to just ban Islam.
I hope you’re being sarcastic, but here’s what I wrote elsewhere in the thread:
So when you say, “But then that's racist and islamophobic”, you can guess how much I value that faggy complaint.