For all of recorded history the age of consent was around between 10 to 13, all the way up until the late 19th century when the first laws started to change. But how did those laws change? I suggest big laws don't change unless and until there is propaganda to make it change. Who pushes propaganda? Who wants those "big laws" to change? The same people that have been in complete control of propaganda since the beginning of the "Enlightenment" (and likely from before).

The people who did all the work were the same people who created the industries of Eugenics, Population Control, Feminism, Darwinism, and later Prohibition (and all their associated social engineering). The primary people who created the consent laws, according to history (current history) were W.T. Stead and Josephine Butler. But who are those people and why would they push that? It had been the same for MILLENNIA, why did they want it to change?

Ostensibly it was to stop child sex trafficking. But the people associated with the sex consent laws were the same people who secretly controlled child sex trafficking (and still do today). It takes a bit of investigation, but all of the people involved were directly associated with people like Rockefeller (through Margaret Sanger and many others), and Rothschild (through too many to count, including Marx and his daughter Eleanor Aveling).

Why would these people, the rulers of the world, and the controllers of child sex trafficking want to increase the laws of consent?

Well...

This is where it gets sticky to talk about.

What if there's nothing wrong with a lower age of consent? Biologically there isn't. That's undisrupted fact. That's why 10+ year olds can have kids all the time. I'm not condoning that, I'm only saying that's what it is. With regards to physical attractiveness, anyone who says a 16 year old girl who looks mature isn't physically attractive is a liar. I'm not going to go any further than that because the phobias regarding that are so strong we can't even have a reasonable conversation on the little I've already said. The entire world is COMPETELY CONTROLLED by our fear of that conversation.

Yet, physically (biologically), and "attractively" (by biological design) it's completely natural. Yet we can't talk about it.

So if there's a biological impetus, and yet that impetus is illegal to the point of being "the worst evil imaginable," how much control is that? How much blackmail is that? My investigation suggests the system is designed such that its a gateway system. First you go to sex parties. Then you get an "underage" girl. Not very underage. Just 16 or 17 is enough. It's the dichotomy of biology vs. taboo that creates the craving for "being naughty" and eventually to liking it more and more. From 16 it goes to 14, then 12. By that time the blackmail is complete, and the entire world of power is controlled.

All because they changed the consent laws.

Before that it wasn't illegal. Fundamentally right or wrong, it wasn't illegal (for forever). There was no power. Now it's complete power.

To the point that now we can't even talk about it.

Again, I'm not condoning anything. I'm just letting you know why we have the sex consent laws we have.

My grand mother was 14. Itbwas the depression. She had a large family. My gramps had a farm and she helped him keep it going and got to eat and have children. In part it was survival.