Those are images of nothing but a wide variety of cellular particulates, most skillfully "proven" via the [non]-expert POINT AND DECLARE technique.
How does the "expert" know those are images of boogeymen-viruses exactly? Do they collect, isolate and purify the "thing in the image" and then later use it, and it alone, to infect others? Sad to say, this has never been done in the history of establishment scientism.
Do they compare the electron-microscopy of tissue from a healthy individual against that of a sick individual? Once again, never been done.
How exactly do these "scientists of good repute" prove their CLAIM after pointing and declaring? Surely they can produce some "science" to back it up, wouldn't you think? Remarkably, they have yet to do so.
Robert Koch created his very rational, logical and common sense "postulates" over 130 years ago. Simply put, find the "thing" causing the dis-ease in the sick person. Remove it and isolate that "thing" from all other "things". Introduce that "thing" to a healthy person where that "thing" is not detected. Demonstrate the healthy person gets the same dis-ease. Identify and isolate the new presence of that "thing" in that person.
Shockingly, such an experiment has never been successfully done. And to wit, they never even came close to isolating the "thing" they thought was causing the disease. They just transferred bodily fluids, mucous, blood, urine, saliva, etc. in any and every way imaginable. All attempts at such "scientific proof" failed spectacularly long ago. So much so, they gave up even trying in the early 1950s. It's been over 60 years since anybody has even tried such experiments.
They've been re-verified by scientists of good repute across decades and across the world.
I can count the number of "actual scientists of good repute" on one hand. All those licensed and endorsed by our cabal-operated mainstream institutions are profoundly brainwashed into the medical cult. And make no mistake, that's exactly what it is - a cult....of insanity no less.
Nonetheless, I appreciate your comment and question. I've spent thousands of hours researching and podcasting on this topic of germ theory, boogeyman-viruses, and the cause of dis-ease at large. I'm always ready to change my opinion with even a modicum of scientific evidence suggesting otherwise. Unfortunately, I have yet to find anything that even comes close.
Thanks for writing back. I'm actually on the fence about the existence of viruses myself. So I take no offense by your position or explanation.
Yet Logic demands that I ask:
Do they compare the electron-microscopy of tissue from a healthy individual against that of a sick individual? Once again, never been done.
If viruses don't exist, why on Earth hasn't some skilled virus skeptic w/ access to an electron microscope compare tissue form a healthy individual against that of a sick one to rule out the existence of viruses?
As you know, not understanding whether a thing exists or not does not determine its existence, nor does it give ANY of us the right to claim it as so.
If viruses don't exist, why on Earth hasn't some skilled virus skeptic w/ access to an electron microscope compare tissue form a healthy individual against that of a sick one to rule out the existence of viruses?
Many have tried likely tens of thousands of times up until the late 1950s. Nobody has ever found any boogeyman-viruses in the living tissue, bodily fluids of dead tissue of a sick or healthy person. Pretty simple.
As you know, not understanding whether a thing exists or not does not determine its existence, nor does it give ANY of us the right to claim it as so.
All our "experts and authorities" are the one's "claiming it is so". The establishment is comprised of brainwashed minions and liars. Most are the former obviously. It's this crowd of materialists that are making the POSITIVE CLAIM. Not me. We're calling them out on their fallacious claim. And "they" have yet to respond to our assertions.
If we were wrong, they would have clearly and carefully showed and explained how what errors we made in forming our conclusions.... a long time ago. Our position has been clearly articulated and presented for over five years now. And yet, not a peep from the "experts".
That should tell you all you need to know.
Look at the basic facts:
Nobody has ever found a boogeyman-virus in "reality". The establishment virologists reluctantly admit this too.
Nobody has ever scientifically demonstrated contagion
Nobody has ever performed an experiment showing how "germs" can be transferred from human to human, via normal transmission vectors like surface contact, air, water, food, etc.
Nobody has ever demonstrated "Koch's Postulates" (which are just basic common sense)
Nobody has ever produced a photograph of a "cell receptor", the very phake and ghey "mechanism" their boogeymen-viruses are said to "trick"
Nobody has ever photographed or video-taped "DNA transcription", the method by which "boogeymen-viruses" are supposed to "reproduce". They can't do this either because the ER, Golgi Apparatus and Ribosomes don't even exist, but are all "integral parts" of alleged "DNA transcription". They're "air bubbles" and "staining artifacts"
The claimed "boogeyman-virus" doesn't have a 'brain", therefore can't possibly have the "will" or "goal" to "reproduce" or "trick fantasy cell receptors"
Bacteria are produced by the body, not "caught" from "out there"
There's no such thing as the "immune system" because there is nothing to be immune to.
Boogeyman-viruses are INDISTINGUISHABLE from what scientists have named "exosomes" (outside the body), meaning not "inside a cell". Exosomes are basically just free-floating cellular particulates. The establishment virologists readily admit this too.
I'm hard pressed to come up with anything for their side. Every one of their "scientISM experiments over the past 50 years rely upon vivisection and animal torture, jabbing helpless creatures with wild brew "toxins", proving utterly nothing. I can whip up a brew of Coca-Cola, Cheeze-Whiz, Cheerios and maple syrup, throw it in a blender and I can quite easily guarantee if we injected it into 100 people, there would be many "negative reactions".
The establishment has only two things on their side. One, they're depdendent on continuing "blind trust in authority" brainwashing holding up. And second, people get sick around each other. These two facts prevent 99% of people from even considering, let alone researching this topic. It's a remarkable thing to witness. And I applaud you for being part of the 1%. You're a rare breed, even around these parts where everybody believes they're "bucking the system".
If you wish to deepen your research and understanding, I recommend reading Mark Bailey's "A Farewell to Virology - expert edition", which you can download for free if you like, or if you want to support he and his lovely wife Sam's work, you can buy the paperback. Info here:
Sam Bailey has also been releasing at least two podcasts a month since mid-2020. She regularly uploads all of them to Odysee.com, whereas, due to YouTube's ongoing censorship, only a handful of her videos make it onto that platform.
And while I applaud all her efforts in carefully and clearly debunking all that she has, unfortunately she remains caught in the materialistic "terrain theory" club. As such, she's always pointing to "toxins", 5G, wifi, junk food, tap water, etc. as the potential causes of dis-ease instead of boogeyman-viruses. Sadly, neither she, nor any other "terrain theorist" has ever produced a single "Cause-to-Disease" relationship. Without such, it's just more unfalsifiable claims to add to the mix.
I'm not going to muddy-up this thread with discussion about "what causes dis-eases". This is, on one hand, a very simple topic to discuss, but because it's so vastly opposite of what we've all been brainwashed into believing all our lives, it's always perceved as UNBELIEVABLE for a time, until the planting ot the seen has time to germinate and grow.
So I'll leave it at that and wish you the best of luck! Happy to answer any questions you have if you want to DM me.
Many have tried likely tens of thousands of times up until the late 1950s. Nobody has ever found any boogeyman-viruses in the living tissue, bodily fluids of dead tissue of a sick or healthy person. Pretty simple.
We live in a world in which healthy skeptics like you and me thrive, in part b/c of the dogged work of researchers who bring the receipts. The notion that "many have tried (to bring to light findings that distinguish w/ the aid of an electron microscope healthy from virally-affected cells) but somehow ALL of their efforts came to naught is equivalent to the DOG ATE MY HOMEWORK argument.
You seem very kind, so let's leave it at this: you're not needing evidence of the contrary to disbelieve in viruses, and I remain uncertain as to what to think (though they'll have to tackle me to the ground before I or any of my loved ones receive another vaccine).
I appreciate your well wishes, TMBZ. Glad to keep it peaceful as we agree to disagree. Take care.
We live in a world in which healthy skeptics like you and me thrive, in part b/c of the dogged work of researchers who bring the receipts. The notion that "many have tried (to bring to light findings that distinguish w/ the aid of an electron microscope healthy from virally-affected cells) but somehow ALL of their efforts came to naught is equivalent to the DOG ATE MY HOMEWORK argument.
Please explain to me how you arrive at this conclusion. The virologists reluctantly, but readily admit this is so. This is why they don't even try to find boogeymen any longer. They stopped trying in the 1950s...and yes...with the use of electron microscopes which were widely in use then.
You seem very kind, so let's leave it at this: you're not needing evidence of the contrary to disbelieve in viruses, and I remain uncertain as to what to think (though they'll have to tackle me to the ground before I or any of my loved ones receive another vaccine).
Well that's a heckuva good start on your part. Kudos to you!
But let's try this another way. For the sake of driving the point home, I'm going to give you the following points:
Scientists have seen viruses (not "exosomes") using the electron microscope
Scientists have purified/isolated said viruses they see, using advanced filtration and centrifugation techniques.
Scientists have pure samples of viruses
Let's say this is all "true", which is effectively what you currently believe. Right?
Wouldn't it follow and be the next most logical and common sense step to use these "purified samples of viruses" in a wide variety of scientific experiments leveraging "normal transmission vectors (surafce, air, water, food exposure)" to demonstrate "transmission"?
Nobody has "proven" anything until this is done anyway, right?
I'm trying to tell you, the reason nobody has ever done this, is because they've already tried thousands of times, with "upurified" samples no less. And it never worked. This is why you won't find such a study since the entire establishment gave up trying this in the 1970s. England's "Common Cold Institute (CCU)" was "officially" shuttered in 1989, but they hadn't done anything even remotely interesting in over a decade by that time.
Now, Iet me also address what is a very common objection to this point, which is that it's "immoral" to infect humans with dis-eases. And yet, we tried exactly this from Pasteur's insane (and highly immoral) experiments in the 1880s, all the way up until the 1950s, when the State of New York tried to infect unsuspecting "orphans" secretly through the drinking water they were served. Both of these examples, pure failures I might add.
A buddy of mine that had just graduated from college and couldn't find a good job participated in a one-month pharmaceutical "clinical trial" for some new drug they were testing. They paid him $4000 which was a lot of money back in the 1980s. He signed away all his rights to sue this company, a shell of a shell of a shell of one of the big pharma companies I might add. But whatever they were giving him, caused him some massive psychoses. So much so, he wanted to leave after the first week, but realized he wouldn't get a nickel if he didn't complete the 30-day program.
Needless to say, my friend had pretty significant psychological problems for over two years. And that pharma shell company paid for about half of his treatments if he swore to never tell his story to a journalist or governmental regulation agency. And he wasn't the only one that had similar problems.
I don't know if these types of programs are still in operation today, but I can assure you, these were far more "immoral" than "infecting volunteers" with an alleged "flu-virus". Right? If I needed the money and knew the worst of what I was getting myself into (flu symptoms), there would be nothing "immoral" about it. Right?
Even smarter, safer and scientifically better would be putting the alleged "flu-virus" in an aerator, water supply, on food, surfaces, etc. which are all the ways we are said to "spread" boogeymen.
But for some reason, nobody has ever done this sort of experiment in the past 50-odd years. In the 1900-1980 timeframe, they did these types of experiments, loosely through various forms of spreading bodily fluids of sick people to healthy people. These all failed spectacularly as well. And they were far from 'scientific" as no "virus" had been isolated from the wide variety of possible substances, toxins, bacteria, etc. that were in those bodily fluids.
Our establishment "experts" don't do any of this...EITHER...with lab animal experiments. All of them involve INJECTIONS, JABCINES, none making any efforts through normal transmission vectors. Why do you suppose that is?
Now, if you do a quick Google search, their algorithm might still be promoting the old 1970s John's Hopkins highly non-scientific experiment in a tuberculosis ward with guinea pigs. This was the "top hit" back in 2020-2021 people would find to "debunk" my assertions. While TB is the result of a bacteria, this is how the establishment is attempting to quash the "contagion hoax" position.
But I encourage you to find and read that John's Hopkins study and see just how many holes you can poke in both their methodology and conclusions. My 10-year old niece designed a better experiment while she was playing video games and I explained it to her. It's one of the dumbest things I've ever read in fact. I laughed my way through it from beginning to end.
you're not needing evidence of the contrary to disbelieve in viruses
This is a "double-negative" sentence that's worth clearing up as I think this point is often lost on most people. Just like you and I both disbelieve in the notion that female unicorns have blonde eyelashes, until PROVEN otherwise, the same holds for the entirety of the "germ theory" myth and existence of boogeymen-viruses.
EM "photographs" of near nano-scopic particles and "experts saying so" is quite simply.....not enough to PROVE THE CLAIM. Like if I went out in the woods and found some short, blonde hairs on a tree trunk, I haven't yet proven they came from my mythical female unicorn yet, right? Even if I produced a photograph of a female unicorn that appeared to have blonde eyelashes, that's still not quite enough, is it (could be photoshopped, right)?
Thus, the only way the establishment can prove their claim is very simple, 5-step process that one of the father's of "germ theory" simply laid out over a hundred years ago.
Identify the "thing/virus" you claim is causing dis-ease in a sick person. (You currently BELIEVE this has been done.).
Remove, isolate and purify this thing/virus from the sick person's fluids/tissues.
Ensure there is no presence of this thing/virus in a healthy person
Expose the healthy person to this thing/virus via normal transmission vectors
Demonstrate the healthy person gets the same dis-ease and identify and isolate the presence of this thing/virus from their bodily fluids
It's all really this simple. You can have your EM photographs, expert assertions, medical school syllabus', viral culturing manufacturing process, and genetic sequencing (really "genetic assembling") fancy-schmancy, highly technical procedures. I'll give it all to you for the sake of my point. Let's say it's all legitimate.
All fo this combined still does NOT PROVE THEIR CLAIM, does it?
The establishment has to transfer these things/viruses via normal transmission vectors, to either human volunteers or lab animals in order to PROVE THEIR CLAIM.
And I'm telling you, the establishment has never achieved this, and frankly, have never even really tried...certainly not in the past 50 years.
So you'll have to contemplate why exactly this is. In a sane world, I would expect there to be thousands, probably tens of thousands of scientific experiments in the establishment journals and literature of this type. But the fact is, there are NONE. Zilch. Zero. Nada.
There's only one logical, rational conclusion that can be drawn as I see it. They don't do it because the ENTIRETY of "germ theory" and contagion is a GIGANTIC FRAUD, end to end. The establishment can no more pull of "Koch's postulates" with boogeymen-viruses than with bacteria.
They don't even try because they know it's a lie ("they" being the higher-up deceivers in our medical institutions). If you were an accredited and well-respected virologist, bacteriologist, immunologist, etc., you couldn't get one red cent of funding or a research grant to perform the 5-step experiment I listed above. This is because the funders know it will fail.
Alternatively, you could get all the funding money you ever needed if your experiment includes needles and toxic substances. There are hundreds, probably thousands of these "clinical trials" going on right now. And I repeat myself by saying that injecting saline into humans can, and often does produce "negative effects". What do these, frankly insane, "medical researchers" exactly think they're doing I wonder?
I'll leave you with this. I'm not here on GA to promote my podcast and I know I'll get myself into hot water if I try to. However, I did one about 3 years ago on boogeymen-viruses that runs a little over an hour and covers the whole history of "germ theory" and "virology" that might further your understanding even more. No need for a link, it shouldn't be hard for you to find our podcasts, knowing only my handle here.
I look forward to your response to all I've said here.
Those are images of nothing but a wide variety of cellular particulates, most skillfully "proven" via the [non]-expert POINT AND DECLARE technique.
How does the "expert" know those are images of boogeymen-viruses exactly? Do they collect, isolate and purify the "thing in the image" and then later use it, and it alone, to infect others? Sad to say, this has never been done in the history of establishment scientism.
Do they compare the electron-microscopy of tissue from a healthy individual against that of a sick individual? Once again, never been done.
How exactly do these "scientists of good repute" prove their CLAIM after pointing and declaring? Surely they can produce some "science" to back it up, wouldn't you think? Remarkably, they have yet to do so.
Robert Koch created his very rational, logical and common sense "postulates" over 130 years ago. Simply put, find the "thing" causing the dis-ease in the sick person. Remove it and isolate that "thing" from all other "things". Introduce that "thing" to a healthy person where that "thing" is not detected. Demonstrate the healthy person gets the same dis-ease. Identify and isolate the new presence of that "thing" in that person.
Shockingly, such an experiment has never been successfully done. And to wit, they never even came close to isolating the "thing" they thought was causing the disease. They just transferred bodily fluids, mucous, blood, urine, saliva, etc. in any and every way imaginable. All attempts at such "scientific proof" failed spectacularly long ago. So much so, they gave up even trying in the early 1950s. It's been over 60 years since anybody has even tried such experiments.
I can count the number of "actual scientists of good repute" on one hand. All those licensed and endorsed by our cabal-operated mainstream institutions are profoundly brainwashed into the medical cult. And make no mistake, that's exactly what it is - a cult....of insanity no less.
Nonetheless, I appreciate your comment and question. I've spent thousands of hours researching and podcasting on this topic of germ theory, boogeyman-viruses, and the cause of dis-ease at large. I'm always ready to change my opinion with even a modicum of scientific evidence suggesting otherwise. Unfortunately, I have yet to find anything that even comes close.
You have a 33 post score and a 441 comment score and you joined 1 year ago.
Why are you here?
What's it to you? I'm here to spread the truth. That's what I do, everywhere I go.
Why are you here?
u/#glowie
Thanks for writing back. I'm actually on the fence about the existence of viruses myself. So I take no offense by your position or explanation.
Yet Logic demands that I ask:
If viruses don't exist, why on Earth hasn't some skilled virus skeptic w/ access to an electron microscope compare tissue form a healthy individual against that of a sick one to rule out the existence of viruses?
As you know, not understanding whether a thing exists or not does not determine its existence, nor does it give ANY of us the right to claim it as so.
Many have tried likely tens of thousands of times up until the late 1950s. Nobody has ever found any boogeyman-viruses in the living tissue, bodily fluids of dead tissue of a sick or healthy person. Pretty simple.
All our "experts and authorities" are the one's "claiming it is so". The establishment is comprised of brainwashed minions and liars. Most are the former obviously. It's this crowd of materialists that are making the POSITIVE CLAIM. Not me. We're calling them out on their fallacious claim. And "they" have yet to respond to our assertions.
If we were wrong, they would have clearly and carefully showed and explained how what errors we made in forming our conclusions.... a long time ago. Our position has been clearly articulated and presented for over five years now. And yet, not a peep from the "experts".
That should tell you all you need to know.
Look at the basic facts:
I'm hard pressed to come up with anything for their side. Every one of their "scientISM experiments over the past 50 years rely upon vivisection and animal torture, jabbing helpless creatures with wild brew "toxins", proving utterly nothing. I can whip up a brew of Coca-Cola, Cheeze-Whiz, Cheerios and maple syrup, throw it in a blender and I can quite easily guarantee if we injected it into 100 people, there would be many "negative reactions".
The establishment has only two things on their side. One, they're depdendent on continuing "blind trust in authority" brainwashing holding up. And second, people get sick around each other. These two facts prevent 99% of people from even considering, let alone researching this topic. It's a remarkable thing to witness. And I applaud you for being part of the 1%. You're a rare breed, even around these parts where everybody believes they're "bucking the system".
If you wish to deepen your research and understanding, I recommend reading Mark Bailey's "A Farewell to Virology - expert edition", which you can download for free if you like, or if you want to support he and his lovely wife Sam's work, you can buy the paperback. Info here:
https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
Sam Bailey has also been releasing at least two podcasts a month since mid-2020. She regularly uploads all of them to Odysee.com, whereas, due to YouTube's ongoing censorship, only a handful of her videos make it onto that platform.
And while I applaud all her efforts in carefully and clearly debunking all that she has, unfortunately she remains caught in the materialistic "terrain theory" club. As such, she's always pointing to "toxins", 5G, wifi, junk food, tap water, etc. as the potential causes of dis-ease instead of boogeyman-viruses. Sadly, neither she, nor any other "terrain theorist" has ever produced a single "Cause-to-Disease" relationship. Without such, it's just more unfalsifiable claims to add to the mix.
I'm not going to muddy-up this thread with discussion about "what causes dis-eases". This is, on one hand, a very simple topic to discuss, but because it's so vastly opposite of what we've all been brainwashed into believing all our lives, it's always perceved as UNBELIEVABLE for a time, until the planting ot the seen has time to germinate and grow.
So I'll leave it at that and wish you the best of luck! Happy to answer any questions you have if you want to DM me.
We live in a world in which healthy skeptics like you and me thrive, in part b/c of the dogged work of researchers who bring the receipts. The notion that "many have tried (to bring to light findings that distinguish w/ the aid of an electron microscope healthy from virally-affected cells) but somehow ALL of their efforts came to naught is equivalent to the DOG ATE MY HOMEWORK argument.
You seem very kind, so let's leave it at this: you're not needing evidence of the contrary to disbelieve in viruses, and I remain uncertain as to what to think (though they'll have to tackle me to the ground before I or any of my loved ones receive another vaccine).
I appreciate your well wishes, TMBZ. Glad to keep it peaceful as we agree to disagree. Take care.
Please explain to me how you arrive at this conclusion. The virologists reluctantly, but readily admit this is so. This is why they don't even try to find boogeymen any longer. They stopped trying in the 1950s...and yes...with the use of electron microscopes which were widely in use then.
Well that's a heckuva good start on your part. Kudos to you!
But let's try this another way. For the sake of driving the point home, I'm going to give you the following points:
Let's say this is all "true", which is effectively what you currently believe. Right?
Wouldn't it follow and be the next most logical and common sense step to use these "purified samples of viruses" in a wide variety of scientific experiments leveraging "normal transmission vectors (surafce, air, water, food exposure)" to demonstrate "transmission"?
Nobody has "proven" anything until this is done anyway, right?
I'm trying to tell you, the reason nobody has ever done this, is because they've already tried thousands of times, with "upurified" samples no less. And it never worked. This is why you won't find such a study since the entire establishment gave up trying this in the 1970s. England's "Common Cold Institute (CCU)" was "officially" shuttered in 1989, but they hadn't done anything even remotely interesting in over a decade by that time.
Now, Iet me also address what is a very common objection to this point, which is that it's "immoral" to infect humans with dis-eases. And yet, we tried exactly this from Pasteur's insane (and highly immoral) experiments in the 1880s, all the way up until the 1950s, when the State of New York tried to infect unsuspecting "orphans" secretly through the drinking water they were served. Both of these examples, pure failures I might add.
A buddy of mine that had just graduated from college and couldn't find a good job participated in a one-month pharmaceutical "clinical trial" for some new drug they were testing. They paid him $4000 which was a lot of money back in the 1980s. He signed away all his rights to sue this company, a shell of a shell of a shell of one of the big pharma companies I might add. But whatever they were giving him, caused him some massive psychoses. So much so, he wanted to leave after the first week, but realized he wouldn't get a nickel if he didn't complete the 30-day program.
Needless to say, my friend had pretty significant psychological problems for over two years. And that pharma shell company paid for about half of his treatments if he swore to never tell his story to a journalist or governmental regulation agency. And he wasn't the only one that had similar problems.
I don't know if these types of programs are still in operation today, but I can assure you, these were far more "immoral" than "infecting volunteers" with an alleged "flu-virus". Right? If I needed the money and knew the worst of what I was getting myself into (flu symptoms), there would be nothing "immoral" about it. Right?
Even smarter, safer and scientifically better would be putting the alleged "flu-virus" in an aerator, water supply, on food, surfaces, etc. which are all the ways we are said to "spread" boogeymen.
But for some reason, nobody has ever done this sort of experiment in the past 50-odd years. In the 1900-1980 timeframe, they did these types of experiments, loosely through various forms of spreading bodily fluids of sick people to healthy people. These all failed spectacularly as well. And they were far from 'scientific" as no "virus" had been isolated from the wide variety of possible substances, toxins, bacteria, etc. that were in those bodily fluids.
Our establishment "experts" don't do any of this...EITHER...with lab animal experiments. All of them involve INJECTIONS, JABCINES, none making any efforts through normal transmission vectors. Why do you suppose that is?
Now, if you do a quick Google search, their algorithm might still be promoting the old 1970s John's Hopkins highly non-scientific experiment in a tuberculosis ward with guinea pigs. This was the "top hit" back in 2020-2021 people would find to "debunk" my assertions. While TB is the result of a bacteria, this is how the establishment is attempting to quash the "contagion hoax" position.
But I encourage you to find and read that John's Hopkins study and see just how many holes you can poke in both their methodology and conclusions. My 10-year old niece designed a better experiment while she was playing video games and I explained it to her. It's one of the dumbest things I've ever read in fact. I laughed my way through it from beginning to end.
This is a "double-negative" sentence that's worth clearing up as I think this point is often lost on most people. Just like you and I both disbelieve in the notion that female unicorns have blonde eyelashes, until PROVEN otherwise, the same holds for the entirety of the "germ theory" myth and existence of boogeymen-viruses.
EM "photographs" of near nano-scopic particles and "experts saying so" is quite simply.....not enough to PROVE THE CLAIM. Like if I went out in the woods and found some short, blonde hairs on a tree trunk, I haven't yet proven they came from my mythical female unicorn yet, right? Even if I produced a photograph of a female unicorn that appeared to have blonde eyelashes, that's still not quite enough, is it (could be photoshopped, right)?
Thus, the only way the establishment can prove their claim is very simple, 5-step process that one of the father's of "germ theory" simply laid out over a hundred years ago.
Identify the "thing/virus" you claim is causing dis-ease in a sick person. (You currently BELIEVE this has been done.).
Remove, isolate and purify this thing/virus from the sick person's fluids/tissues.
Ensure there is no presence of this thing/virus in a healthy person
Expose the healthy person to this thing/virus via normal transmission vectors
Demonstrate the healthy person gets the same dis-ease and identify and isolate the presence of this thing/virus from their bodily fluids
It's all really this simple. You can have your EM photographs, expert assertions, medical school syllabus', viral culturing manufacturing process, and genetic sequencing (really "genetic assembling") fancy-schmancy, highly technical procedures. I'll give it all to you for the sake of my point. Let's say it's all legitimate.
All fo this combined still does NOT PROVE THEIR CLAIM, does it?
The establishment has to transfer these things/viruses via normal transmission vectors, to either human volunteers or lab animals in order to PROVE THEIR CLAIM.
And I'm telling you, the establishment has never achieved this, and frankly, have never even really tried...certainly not in the past 50 years.
So you'll have to contemplate why exactly this is. In a sane world, I would expect there to be thousands, probably tens of thousands of scientific experiments in the establishment journals and literature of this type. But the fact is, there are NONE. Zilch. Zero. Nada.
There's only one logical, rational conclusion that can be drawn as I see it. They don't do it because the ENTIRETY of "germ theory" and contagion is a GIGANTIC FRAUD, end to end. The establishment can no more pull of "Koch's postulates" with boogeymen-viruses than with bacteria.
They don't even try because they know it's a lie ("they" being the higher-up deceivers in our medical institutions). If you were an accredited and well-respected virologist, bacteriologist, immunologist, etc., you couldn't get one red cent of funding or a research grant to perform the 5-step experiment I listed above. This is because the funders know it will fail.
Alternatively, you could get all the funding money you ever needed if your experiment includes needles and toxic substances. There are hundreds, probably thousands of these "clinical trials" going on right now. And I repeat myself by saying that injecting saline into humans can, and often does produce "negative effects". What do these, frankly insane, "medical researchers" exactly think they're doing I wonder?
I'll leave you with this. I'm not here on GA to promote my podcast and I know I'll get myself into hot water if I try to. However, I did one about 3 years ago on boogeymen-viruses that runs a little over an hour and covers the whole history of "germ theory" and "virology" that might further your understanding even more. No need for a link, it shouldn't be hard for you to find our podcasts, knowing only my handle here.
I look forward to your response to all I've said here.