You don't have the slightest lick of sense for the appropriate scale of discussion. This is barrage warfare, and I don't have the time for it.
But at least on the subject of cataracts, what I said stands and you only repeated it: they are a result of getting older. I said nothing about a cause, so you are shorting me for not explaining something I did not mention. As people are different, they will show up at different ages. LIke arthritis. If you are fortunate, you don't get it. The cataract IS the crystallization of the lens, a process that also deprives it of flexibility and leads to presbyopia. I should know. I did quality engineering on lenses to correct the former and I have had the latter since the age of 40.
"Than they used to" dates back several hundred years. We have no other experience, and even the Bible gives us 70 (maybe 80) years (Psalm 90:10).
You begin to go over the edge on the subject of Christians (and Jews) being the discoverers of science, denying that Jews are Jews and actually denying that Christians are Christians. When in doubt, deny the facts of rebuttal. It only proves my point that science and technology are God-given
You specialize in reality denial, so I don't have much patience with that.
As such, my reply will be short and sweet. I am asserting we have been lied to about virtually everything we can't easily verify for ourselves. If you're here on this board, you've sniffed out some of these lies in the government, political and media arenas. I'd guess, collectively, this board has sussed-out perhaps 10% of these lies. There's a long way to go...
in terms of our lying medical and religious institutions, it appears you've yet to break the seal with either. Collectively, this board has sussed-out maybe 1% of the lies in the medical establishment, and 0% in the Christian establishment. This is the "herd", I well recognize, that you're resonating with.
I'm quite obviously not part of "the herd". A herd I broke away from some 17 years ago. I've been a huge "disruptor" ever since.
I'll just close by saying, 90% of what you (and the collective) BELIEVES (Yes bold/caps, pause and notice the word) about dis-ease and Christianity is easily, provably false. But alas, I realize, if you aren't interested in discovering how thoroughly and massively you've been lied to, then everything I write will indeed appear to you as "barrage warfare"....which, BTW, I love how you said it. Absolutely perfect!
So no more barrages. If and when you start to question things, feel free to DM me down the road. I'll probably be around another year or so, but will eventually need to move on when this board shifts into full "echo-chamber" mode", which it almost is now. If I can free a few souls from it before then, my disruptive comments will have been well worth it!
Otherwise, wishing you the best in all things! Nothing is more important than that you feel good in the end!
Your assertion is only an assertion, as you admit you cannot prove it.
The recent lies have been exposed because we have access to those who do not lie. And can verify the truth. That is the way of all lies. You seem to have some idea that I have followed along without questioning, which is far from the truth. I think it is part of the "if you're not with me, you're against me" mentality. According to you, the germ theory cannot work...except that it has. Big disproof of your position. (I am a theorist by profession.)
Arguments are not won by barrage warfare, which is simple rudeness over the size of an entry on this board. So many points, not all can be answered completely.
And there are actually things more important than how I feel, but now I know you don't see that.
Your assertion is only an assertion, as you admit you cannot prove it.
Please tell me one thing I "admit I can't prove" that we've discussed. I can easily prove that "time and age" don't cause cataracts. I can prove Apostle Paul never talked about a man named Jesus. I can prove boogeyman-viruses have never been shown to exist. I can prove Dr. Malone has chosen to dismiss and ignore the fact that his (the establishment's) "proof of viruses" is a giant fraud.
That is the way of all lies. You seem to have some idea that I have followed along without questioning, which is far from the truth
I said your current positions are in-line with the echo-chamber herd. Not that you've never questioned anything. You have shown in your responses that nothing I've said you're simply INTERESTED IN QUESTIONING. You're not "interested" because you BELIEVE you (the herd) is already "right". This is why most people rarely question things. Because they think they already have the right answer.
I think it is part of the "if you're not with me, you're against me" mentality.
This is not my mentality. I'm well aware that almost nobody is "with me". If I had this mentality, I'd just say "you're all idiots for believing in this, that and the other and not believing me". But I once "believed this, that and the other" like all the rest of you. I was once part of the herd. As such, my approach is to give examples which hopefully encourage herd-members to start asking questions. But you didn't ask me any questions. All you've done is told me what you believe. This is why it appears to you as "barrage warfare"....hahaha...still love that phrase.
Instead of telling me what you believe (which I already know because I once believed the same), why don't you ask me a question, or for a link to an article, book, video that further makes my point in an effort to understand what I'm saying?
Do you recall how our whole dialogue got started. I accused Dr. Malone of being controlled opposition. Why did you jump to "Nuh-uh" so quickly? He's literally the perfect definition of "controlled opposition" in fact. Just because he's against COVID jabs, doesn't mean he's on our side. He's also the perfect definition of a "limited hangout". He tells you something you want to hear, but then goes on maintaining the FAR LARGER lie of germ theory.
Have you list sight of this?
According to you, the germ theory cannot work...except that it has. Big disproof of your position. (I am a theorist by profession.)
This is a perfect example of you telling me what you BELIEVE. Can you provide a single scientific experiment proving "germ theory" works? Myself and thousands of others looked for one during the last half of 2020 and all we could find were papers that DISPROVED "germ theory".
Let's not argue about BELIEFS though. What a waste of time. Produce the "facts" you BELIEVE you have. "Facts" that are based in science only please. I anxiously await your sharing here.
Arguments are not won by barrage warfare, which is simple rudeness over the size of an entry on this board. So many points, not all can be answered completely.
I'm not in any way trying to "argue" with you....ever. The length of my responses is an attempt to clearly explain what I'm driving at. I can say very short phrases but they only ever elicit "nuh-uhs" if you're not interested in understanding. Right?
Germ theory is a hoax
Boogeymen-viruses don't exist
Contagion is a myth
Time and age don't cause cataracts
Dr. Malone is controlled opposition
Apostle Paul never once mentions a man named Jesus
I could write 10,000 word articles or books on each of these bullet points. But if all you're going to do is say "nuh-uh", instead of asking me for more clarity or evidence, you're trapped in these "Herd belief systems". Belief systems, I might add, that are not serving your best interests. Something you don't yet realize because you have not yet questioned them.
And there are actually things more important than how I feel, but now I know you don't see that.
The "cause" of cataracts was not a subject I introduced, and is immaterial to the fact of their existence. If you know the cause, opthalmologic science would like to know (but they are not holding their breath). Basically, it seems to be polymerization (cross-linking) of the lens material, a time-related process. Sometimes fast and sometimes slow. Happens to plastics all the time.
My "current positions"? Like what? I doubt you know what they are. Often the outside world is correct. Want to bet anything that I think Einstein was correct about relativity?
Just as a quick search: Ephesians 1:15-17 "15 Therefore, I, too, hearing of your faith in the Lord Jesus and of your love[a] for all the holy ones, 16 do not cease giving thanks for you, remembering you in my prayers, 17 that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give you a spirit of wisdom and revelation resulting in knowledge of him." It is said he mentions Jesus by name 200 times in his 13 epistles.
The length of your response is revolting. That you can't get that through your head is a reflection on your perspicacity.
You don't have the slightest lick of sense for the appropriate scale of discussion. This is barrage warfare, and I don't have the time for it.
But at least on the subject of cataracts, what I said stands and you only repeated it: they are a result of getting older. I said nothing about a cause, so you are shorting me for not explaining something I did not mention. As people are different, they will show up at different ages. LIke arthritis. If you are fortunate, you don't get it. The cataract IS the crystallization of the lens, a process that also deprives it of flexibility and leads to presbyopia. I should know. I did quality engineering on lenses to correct the former and I have had the latter since the age of 40.
"Than they used to" dates back several hundred years. We have no other experience, and even the Bible gives us 70 (maybe 80) years (Psalm 90:10).
You begin to go over the edge on the subject of Christians (and Jews) being the discoverers of science, denying that Jews are Jews and actually denying that Christians are Christians. When in doubt, deny the facts of rebuttal. It only proves my point that science and technology are God-given
You specialize in reality denial, so I don't have much patience with that.
Haha, hilarious. Well done and touche!
As such, my reply will be short and sweet. I am asserting we have been lied to about virtually everything we can't easily verify for ourselves. If you're here on this board, you've sniffed out some of these lies in the government, political and media arenas. I'd guess, collectively, this board has sussed-out perhaps 10% of these lies. There's a long way to go...
in terms of our lying medical and religious institutions, it appears you've yet to break the seal with either. Collectively, this board has sussed-out maybe 1% of the lies in the medical establishment, and 0% in the Christian establishment. This is the "herd", I well recognize, that you're resonating with.
I'm quite obviously not part of "the herd". A herd I broke away from some 17 years ago. I've been a huge "disruptor" ever since.
I'll just close by saying, 90% of what you (and the collective) BELIEVES (Yes bold/caps, pause and notice the word) about dis-ease and Christianity is easily, provably false. But alas, I realize, if you aren't interested in discovering how thoroughly and massively you've been lied to, then everything I write will indeed appear to you as "barrage warfare"....which, BTW, I love how you said it. Absolutely perfect!
So no more barrages. If and when you start to question things, feel free to DM me down the road. I'll probably be around another year or so, but will eventually need to move on when this board shifts into full "echo-chamber" mode", which it almost is now. If I can free a few souls from it before then, my disruptive comments will have been well worth it!
Otherwise, wishing you the best in all things! Nothing is more important than that you feel good in the end!
Your assertion is only an assertion, as you admit you cannot prove it.
The recent lies have been exposed because we have access to those who do not lie. And can verify the truth. That is the way of all lies. You seem to have some idea that I have followed along without questioning, which is far from the truth. I think it is part of the "if you're not with me, you're against me" mentality. According to you, the germ theory cannot work...except that it has. Big disproof of your position. (I am a theorist by profession.)
Arguments are not won by barrage warfare, which is simple rudeness over the size of an entry on this board. So many points, not all can be answered completely.
And there are actually things more important than how I feel, but now I know you don't see that.
Please tell me one thing I "admit I can't prove" that we've discussed. I can easily prove that "time and age" don't cause cataracts. I can prove Apostle Paul never talked about a man named Jesus. I can prove boogeyman-viruses have never been shown to exist. I can prove Dr. Malone has chosen to dismiss and ignore the fact that his (the establishment's) "proof of viruses" is a giant fraud.
I said your current positions are in-line with the echo-chamber herd. Not that you've never questioned anything. You have shown in your responses that nothing I've said you're simply INTERESTED IN QUESTIONING. You're not "interested" because you BELIEVE you (the herd) is already "right". This is why most people rarely question things. Because they think they already have the right answer.
This is not my mentality. I'm well aware that almost nobody is "with me". If I had this mentality, I'd just say "you're all idiots for believing in this, that and the other and not believing me". But I once "believed this, that and the other" like all the rest of you. I was once part of the herd. As such, my approach is to give examples which hopefully encourage herd-members to start asking questions. But you didn't ask me any questions. All you've done is told me what you believe. This is why it appears to you as "barrage warfare"....hahaha...still love that phrase.
Instead of telling me what you believe (which I already know because I once believed the same), why don't you ask me a question, or for a link to an article, book, video that further makes my point in an effort to understand what I'm saying?
Do you recall how our whole dialogue got started. I accused Dr. Malone of being controlled opposition. Why did you jump to "Nuh-uh" so quickly? He's literally the perfect definition of "controlled opposition" in fact. Just because he's against COVID jabs, doesn't mean he's on our side. He's also the perfect definition of a "limited hangout". He tells you something you want to hear, but then goes on maintaining the FAR LARGER lie of germ theory.
Have you list sight of this?
This is a perfect example of you telling me what you BELIEVE. Can you provide a single scientific experiment proving "germ theory" works? Myself and thousands of others looked for one during the last half of 2020 and all we could find were papers that DISPROVED "germ theory".
Let's not argue about BELIEFS though. What a waste of time. Produce the "facts" you BELIEVE you have. "Facts" that are based in science only please. I anxiously await your sharing here.
I'm not in any way trying to "argue" with you....ever. The length of my responses is an attempt to clearly explain what I'm driving at. I can say very short phrases but they only ever elicit "nuh-uhs" if you're not interested in understanding. Right?
I could write 10,000 word articles or books on each of these bullet points. But if all you're going to do is say "nuh-uh", instead of asking me for more clarity or evidence, you're trapped in these "Herd belief systems". Belief systems, I might add, that are not serving your best interests. Something you don't yet realize because you have not yet questioned them.
Please name just one.
The "cause" of cataracts was not a subject I introduced, and is immaterial to the fact of their existence. If you know the cause, opthalmologic science would like to know (but they are not holding their breath). Basically, it seems to be polymerization (cross-linking) of the lens material, a time-related process. Sometimes fast and sometimes slow. Happens to plastics all the time.
My "current positions"? Like what? I doubt you know what they are. Often the outside world is correct. Want to bet anything that I think Einstein was correct about relativity?
Just as a quick search: Ephesians 1:15-17 "15 Therefore, I, too, hearing of your faith in the Lord Jesus and of your love[a] for all the holy ones, 16 do not cease giving thanks for you, remembering you in my prayers, 17 that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give you a spirit of wisdom and revelation resulting in knowledge of him." It is said he mentions Jesus by name 200 times in his 13 epistles.
The length of your response is revolting. That you can't get that through your head is a reflection on your perspicacity.