One thing still bothers me about the driver theory. Wouldn’t Jackie be a significant loose end, as a witness? Unless her kids were used as ‘collateral’, which is conceivable, albeit disgusting.
Go watch the zapruder film, go frame by frame, I think it’s 263, when Jackie grabs him, where is her right hand? Why do I see a muzzle flash on the right side of jfk’s head?? Look at the blood spatter. Kill shot?
Ya, driver shoots him, but Jackie appears to deliver the kill shot. That’s what I see.
Not AI but they could "Photoshop" all film, be it stills or each frame from a video (which is nothing but still images run at 29 pictures per second. (24 for movies).
So very easy to manipulate pictures in the darkroom by hand.
The films I've seen are tough to follow, even slowed down. I even saw one that had me convinced to this day that Jackie shot him. Pulled a gun out of her purse and held it to his temple blasting him and setting him down before jumping off the back of the car. It is stunning, even in super slow motion. She is also in question as far out as that one sounds, I'm still stunned to this day! The super slow motion had her so mechanical and precise I must have watched it 100 times in disbelief. And that was before AI. Now its all out the window.
Air powered gun, bullet had some sort of "Australian octopus" poison built in, AND I believe there was a "backup sniper" as well (different caliber than the rifle Oswald supposedly used).
There's also a photo of a young George Bush Sr. outside the Dallas Book Repository if you take a look around on the internet. You know, the guy that became CIA director, then VP, then president? Makes you wonder if he wasn't involved in the Reagan assassination attempt, just like LBJ did to RFK when he was VP.
You can't "unsee" the pattern once you pick it up.
Age restricted. :/
One thing still bothers me about the driver theory. Wouldn’t Jackie be a significant loose end, as a witness? Unless her kids were used as ‘collateral’, which is conceivable, albeit disgusting.
Go watch the zapruder film, go frame by frame, I think it’s 263, when Jackie grabs him, where is her right hand? Why do I see a muzzle flash on the right side of jfk’s head?? Look at the blood spatter. Kill shot?
Ya, driver shoots him, but Jackie appears to deliver the kill shot. That’s what I see.
The tree is interesting. Did they have AI editing back in 1963?
Not AI but they could "Photoshop" all film, be it stills or each frame from a video (which is nothing but still images run at 29 pictures per second. (24 for movies).
So very easy to manipulate pictures in the darkroom by hand.
I wouldn't knock it considering we've received everything after it's served it's purpose
That would make Jackie O in on it. She would've seen it clearly
The films I've seen are tough to follow, even slowed down. I even saw one that had me convinced to this day that Jackie shot him. Pulled a gun out of her purse and held it to his temple blasting him and setting him down before jumping off the back of the car. It is stunning, even in super slow motion. She is also in question as far out as that one sounds, I'm still stunned to this day! The super slow motion had her so mechanical and precise I must have watched it 100 times in disbelief. And that was before AI. Now its all out the window.
Jackie was probably his "handler"..
Air powered gun, bullet had some sort of "Australian octopus" poison built in, AND I believe there was a "backup sniper" as well (different caliber than the rifle Oswald supposedly used). There's also a photo of a young George Bush Sr. outside the Dallas Book Repository if you take a look around on the internet. You know, the guy that became CIA director, then VP, then president? Makes you wonder if he wasn't involved in the Reagan assassination attempt, just like LBJ did to RFK when he was VP. You can't "unsee" the pattern once you pick it up.
The same picture Trump used in a video a year or so ago with the Aerosmith song playing.