Except they aren’t inviting it in any more than we are. They have NGOs with compliant politicians who are subservient to higher level politicians that don’t answer to anybody.
We were in the same boat, and might still be in the same boat.
I keep asking but don’t get a lot of engagement on thought toward the answer - how can we lawfully demand that this stops, here?
That's a great question AE... u/Malachi3vs16 makes a good point how it could be done lawfully. I think the biggest problem with that is the stunning lack of politicians with testicular fortitude.
Far too many people today care way too much about what other people think.
[They] like to use “Think Tanks” against us as information warfare, yes? A bunch of people get together and wargame out how to best defeat us. Tanks are used, like cannons were used, to shape the battlefield. Boom. One big function of a think tank is to write legislation to be presented to legislators and to organize getting backing behind that legislation.
What I’m getting at is - why couldn’t we operate like an open source citizen think tank - wargaming out legislation, building popular support for it, etc.
We say our legislators don’t have the guts to do what should be done. Well, what should be done? Do they know we’re behind them or demanding some action?
excellent portrayal of what they do and hat White Hats can do.
constitutionalists are often like a minnow in a sea of sharks at major universities, and few understand the American system of economics that Trump is shaping America into.
At location x in Wash. D.C., call it “Q” for now, locate the think tank. At a second location nearby or annex have apartment complex for approx. 40-50 college students to intern a semester (spring, summer, autumn) to intern with the think tank and / or Treasury, Dept. of Commerce, maybe a couple of MAHA -intersted students attend to intern at Dept. of Health…
Guest lecturers could include prominent White Hats. to educate about current topics as they develop.
And optional (or mandatory?) a Doge dog as mascot and resident furry friend
the art captures what’s going on, tragic for children especially harmed by this
“Dean Compton” wanted to get a couple of hundred thousand volunteers on the borders in the mid ‘90s to stop all the problems, he was on radio talk shows in California, but feds took his house and shut him down— no fortitude— Pete Wilson an establishment Republican was governor
Just ran into this, maybe that group has a better legal guideline that cites specific clauses for actionability?
The town hall was full. On the screen, the CRB Portal showed the plain-English rule citizens had just ratified: asylum is for people fleeing danger who agree to live under America’s Constitution, not to replace it. The terms were simple and fair—tell the truth, renounce coercion, accept our rights and duties. If later evidence shows the claim was made in bad faith—if the goal was to organize to overturn the constitutional order or import a foreign legal code—status is reviewed with full due process. Proven fraud means return to a safer, culturally compatible country. Compassion remains; deceit does not.
A woman in the back asked the obvious question: “What about protests?” The Portal answered the way Americans do—by drawing a bright line. Peaceful speech stays free; no government may punish belief. But using asylum as a Trojan horse to agitate for replacing the Constitution is not protected by that promise. That is misrepresentation of intent. Under the CRA, citizens—not distant bureaucrats—set this standard, ratified it, and can tighten or relax it as experience teaches.
The room nodded. People here had prayed beside neighbors of every faith, hired new arrivals, and welcomed the persecuted. They would keep doing so. But they would also defend the house they welcomed people into. Under CRA, executive orders and agency rules on asylum cannot slip past the people. Three monthly rejections remove them; ratification keeps them. Propaganda campaigns that try to warp the vote are flagged as tampering, logged, and defeated by sunlight.
By the end of the night, the ledger on the Portal was clear: mercy with honesty, refuge without surrender, free speech without subversion. Government governs. Citizens hold the final say. And America stays America—open to the truthful, firm with the deceitful, anchored by consent.
— Jeff Gunson
President, Citizens Ratification Inc.
I serve probono.
If you believe in citizen oversight of government, repost
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”
a) establishments of religion were the official established churches, Virginia was the Church of England (then Anglican — aside, they used to “dunk” Baptists to show them what the majority of Virginians thought of the Baptists), Massachusetts had the Congregational Church (Puritans). we could establish principles of truth and virtue as establishments, excluding those systems that oppress humanity.
b) “nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof” — woke leftist scholars would say this could be a block in the way of restoring America.
However, not so: the millions causing the trouble are here as an invasion, a jihad to change the character of America. It was planned decades ago, if not longer. Billy C. brought in Somali Muslims, beginning the ruination of Minnesota .
Article IV powers: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of government, and **shall protect each of them against Invasion”…
Congress has been the problem since the 1960s. President Trump, as CIC, can repel this invasion. There is no limit on this duty and power.Nothing says governors can’t do this too — time to start making a ”Texas kick-em” out policy to where they came from. Listening Texas governor?
Dummies, just plain ignorant lemmi is yearning to commit suicide by inviting the enemy into their cities and towns. Once the muzzies have a majority of a city's population, don't think for a minute they will begin pushing for Sharia law. They are like locust and will devour anything and everything beautiful.
Except they aren’t inviting it in any more than we are. They have NGOs with compliant politicians who are subservient to higher level politicians that don’t answer to anybody.
We were in the same boat, and might still be in the same boat.
I keep asking but don’t get a lot of engagement on thought toward the answer - how can we lawfully demand that this stops, here?
That's a great question AE...
u/Malachi3vs16 makes a good point how it could be done lawfully. I think the biggest problem with that is the stunning lack of politicians with testicular fortitude.
Far too many people today care way too much about what other people think.
[They] like to use “Think Tanks” against us as information warfare, yes? A bunch of people get together and wargame out how to best defeat us. Tanks are used, like cannons were used, to shape the battlefield. Boom. One big function of a think tank is to write legislation to be presented to legislators and to organize getting backing behind that legislation.
What I’m getting at is - why couldn’t we operate like an open source citizen think tank - wargaming out legislation, building popular support for it, etc.
We say our legislators don’t have the guts to do what should be done. Well, what should be done? Do they know we’re behind them or demanding some action?
u/Malachi3vs16
excellent portrayal of what they do and hat White Hats can do.
constitutionalists are often like a minnow in a sea of sharks at major universities, and few understand the American system of economics that Trump is shaping America into.
At location x in Wash. D.C., call it “Q” for now, locate the think tank. At a second location nearby or annex have apartment complex for approx. 40-50 college students to intern a semester (spring, summer, autumn) to intern with the think tank and / or Treasury, Dept. of Commerce, maybe a couple of MAHA -intersted students attend to intern at Dept. of Health…
Guest lecturers could include prominent White Hats. to educate about current topics as they develop.
And optional (or mandatory?) a Doge dog as mascot and resident furry friend
the art captures what’s going on, tragic for children especially harmed by this
“Dean Compton” wanted to get a couple of hundred thousand volunteers on the borders in the mid ‘90s to stop all the problems, he was on radio talk shows in California, but feds took his house and shut him down— no fortitude— Pete Wilson an establishment Republican was governor
Just ran into this, maybe that group has a better legal guideline that cites specific clauses for actionability?
The town hall was full. On the screen, the CRB Portal showed the plain-English rule citizens had just ratified: asylum is for people fleeing danger who agree to live under America’s Constitution, not to replace it. The terms were simple and fair—tell the truth, renounce coercion, accept our rights and duties. If later evidence shows the claim was made in bad faith—if the goal was to organize to overturn the constitutional order or import a foreign legal code—status is reviewed with full due process. Proven fraud means return to a safer, culturally compatible country. Compassion remains; deceit does not.
A woman in the back asked the obvious question: “What about protests?” The Portal answered the way Americans do—by drawing a bright line. Peaceful speech stays free; no government may punish belief. But using asylum as a Trojan horse to agitate for replacing the Constitution is not protected by that promise. That is misrepresentation of intent. Under the CRA, citizens—not distant bureaucrats—set this standard, ratified it, and can tighten or relax it as experience teaches.
The room nodded. People here had prayed beside neighbors of every faith, hired new arrivals, and welcomed the persecuted. They would keep doing so. But they would also defend the house they welcomed people into. Under CRA, executive orders and agency rules on asylum cannot slip past the people. Three monthly rejections remove them; ratification keeps them. Propaganda campaigns that try to warp the vote are flagged as tampering, logged, and defeated by sunlight.
By the end of the night, the ledger on the Portal was clear: mercy with honesty, refuge without surrender, free speech without subversion. Government governs. Citizens hold the final say. And America stays America—open to the truthful, firm with the deceitful, anchored by consent.
— Jeff Gunson President, Citizens Ratification Inc. I serve probono. If you believe in citizen oversight of government, repost
The first amendment Bill of Rights:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”
a) establishments of religion were the official established churches, Virginia was the Church of England (then Anglican — aside, they used to “dunk” Baptists to show them what the majority of Virginians thought of the Baptists), Massachusetts had the Congregational Church (Puritans). we could establish principles of truth and virtue as establishments, excluding those systems that oppress humanity.
b) “nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof” — woke leftist scholars would say this could be a block in the way of restoring America.
However, not so: the millions causing the trouble are here as an invasion, a jihad to change the character of America. It was planned decades ago, if not longer. Billy C. brought in Somali Muslims, beginning the ruination of Minnesota .
Article IV powers: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican form of government, and **shall protect each of them against Invasion”…
Congress has been the problem since the 1960s. President Trump, as CIC, can repel this invasion. There is no limit on this duty and power. Nothing says governors can’t do this too — time to start making a ”Texas kick-em” out policy to where they came from. Listening Texas governor?
Patriots can be in control all they want, but Islam is growing here and they're getting into positions of power legitimately.
Dummies, just plain ignorant lemmi is yearning to commit suicide by inviting the enemy into their cities and towns. Once the muzzies have a majority of a city's population, don't think for a minute they will begin pushing for Sharia law. They are like locust and will devour anything and everything beautiful.
Islam isn't the problem.
Islam is just another symptom.
The root cause goes much deeper.
Islam is a world conquering ideology. They've been trying to do it ever since their founding 1,400 years ago. I would say it is a major problem.
Influenza is a problem and is dangerous, sometimes murderously so.
But old people die from it because their body's resistance is weak, not because the flu is strong