I'm simply acknowledging that I don't and can't know and don't feel anyone else can KNOW. that being said, if certain and many proofs lead in a certain direction than a theory becomes more and more plausible. I have not landed on a solid theory about the earth being flat, triangle, round, irregular, etc. there are lots of proofs tending toward various philosophies and I think that anyone talking in absolute terms about anything (Earth, vaccines, 9/11, moon landing, chemtrails, etc) without the humility to realize none of us truly know anything 100%, is a muppet
It simply isn’t ok to question the shape of the earth nowadays - yes we KNOW it’s an oblate spheroid… but oh so slightly not perfect because we spin. To question this proven fact is to be a muppet or as smart as one. Anyone with half an education can simply observe this and with just a bit more solid education one can prove it many many ways. This is no longer theoretical. Birds might not be real though :)
well I guess graduating summa cum laude in engineering with plenty of physics classes was a farce :) too many questions for me to buy that we're spinning at over 1,000 mph and we don't feel any lifting g force or there's not an insane wind created from the atmosphere above us that experiences a different gravitational force being further away from the center and surface of the earth. who knows. you and I will never solve this and more importantly we don't need to
So this is like graduating high-school with honors and not being able to read and write, ya? So through all of your apparent schooling you never really grasped the size of the planet, huh? 1000mph you wouldn't feel as its relative - we're moving with it and it doesn't create enough force to escape gravity - for that you'd have to be going over 17k mph. Then pull in relative speeds and the atmosphere moving right along with us and indeed you would feel no wind; although with Coriolis effect is there really no wind? I have to believe either you didn't graduate with an engineering degree at all or you're trolling. Either way - you need to go back to school, FLERF
You’re claiming to have graduated with a degree in engineering and you think calculating g of the twin towers is impressive? Dude, seriously, my first year physics students in HIGH SCHOOL could do it, the academic level, not the AP. Geez, and you didn’t know that eclipses involved earth, moon, and sun.
where did I claim that "calculating g of the twin towers" was impressive? and what does that statement even mean? "g" of the twin towers. they seem to have fell at virtual free fall, 9.82 m/s^2 or whatever they tell us, but I never felt the need to do a lab study on it. it's apparent. and Bldg 7 couldn't be more obvious. no calculating needed and in case you missed the NIST report by "engineers" they managed to come up with some other calcs, which is only further proof that enginnering isn't even a perfect science because the engineer can add in resistances, etc that may not actually be there
I'm simply acknowledging that I don't and can't know and don't feel anyone else can KNOW. that being said, if certain and many proofs lead in a certain direction than a theory becomes more and more plausible. I have not landed on a solid theory about the earth being flat, triangle, round, irregular, etc. there are lots of proofs tending toward various philosophies and I think that anyone talking in absolute terms about anything (Earth, vaccines, 9/11, moon landing, chemtrails, etc) without the humility to realize none of us truly know anything 100%, is a muppet
It simply isn’t ok to question the shape of the earth nowadays - yes we KNOW it’s an oblate spheroid… but oh so slightly not perfect because we spin. To question this proven fact is to be a muppet or as smart as one. Anyone with half an education can simply observe this and with just a bit more solid education one can prove it many many ways. This is no longer theoretical. Birds might not be real though :)
well I guess graduating summa cum laude in engineering with plenty of physics classes was a farce :) too many questions for me to buy that we're spinning at over 1,000 mph and we don't feel any lifting g force or there's not an insane wind created from the atmosphere above us that experiences a different gravitational force being further away from the center and surface of the earth. who knows. you and I will never solve this and more importantly we don't need to
So this is like graduating high-school with honors and not being able to read and write, ya? So through all of your apparent schooling you never really grasped the size of the planet, huh? 1000mph you wouldn't feel as its relative - we're moving with it and it doesn't create enough force to escape gravity - for that you'd have to be going over 17k mph. Then pull in relative speeds and the atmosphere moving right along with us and indeed you would feel no wind; although with Coriolis effect is there really no wind? I have to believe either you didn't graduate with an engineering degree at all or you're trolling. Either way - you need to go back to school, FLERF
you are regurgitating what they TAUGHT you. think for yourself and realize what they taught us needs to be proven. or stay normie and don't
best wishes, and I mean this sincerely
OP is a freakin liar.
You’re claiming to have graduated with a degree in engineering and you think calculating g of the twin towers is impressive? Dude, seriously, my first year physics students in HIGH SCHOOL could do it, the academic level, not the AP. Geez, and you didn’t know that eclipses involved earth, moon, and sun.
where did I claim that "calculating g of the twin towers" was impressive? and what does that statement even mean? "g" of the twin towers. they seem to have fell at virtual free fall, 9.82 m/s^2 or whatever they tell us, but I never felt the need to do a lab study on it. it's apparent. and Bldg 7 couldn't be more obvious. no calculating needed and in case you missed the NIST report by "engineers" they managed to come up with some other calcs, which is only further proof that enginnering isn't even a perfect science because the engineer can add in resistances, etc that may not actually be there
https://www.youtube.com/@SciManDan