You did not watch the movie where you'd hear Silverstein say it in his own words. There was no dubious structural integrity at Bldg 7. The guy who did the movie is a structural engineer himself. Had you watched the movie you'd have known there was plenty of time for sabotage for the two towers and Bldg 7. When you post without investing the necessary time to do the research you just sound confused and stupid.
It doesn't matter. I found the Silverstein remark, which is inconclusive. He was referring to "pulling out" the firefighting personnel in or near the building. It is a weak reed to lean on.
You did not watch the movie where you'd hear Silverstein say it in his own words. There was no dubious structural integrity at Bldg 7. The guy who did the movie is a structural engineer himself. Had you watched the movie you'd have known there was plenty of time for sabotage for the two towers and Bldg 7. When you post without investing the necessary time to do the research you just sound confused and stupid.
I don't have access to this wonderful movie, and I am not much concerned about Building 7. If the case is open and shut, why is there any controversy?
Since the Twin Towers had no signs of demolition, I see no point in chewing on that one. That "conspiracy" is a fantasy.
CODEX 911 has been stickied all over GAW for the past few days. Look it up. Watch it, or just continue to make stupid, grossly un-informed posts.
It doesn't matter. I found the Silverstein remark, which is inconclusive. He was referring to "pulling out" the firefighting personnel in or near the building. It is a weak reed to lean on.